From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Arbaz Amin Khan

Arbaz Amin Khan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the coverages are paid. There are Brand post tag on those news coverages. Fails WP:GNG. Trakinwiki ( talk) 20:17, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:32, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:32, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Netherzone ( talk) 20:51, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone ( talk) 20:51, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as per nom, another resume sourced by paid press releases. No notability here, borderline WP:CSD#G11 too. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 22:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - non-notable photographer who does not pass WP:CREATIVE nor WP:GNG. The article is constructed with "sources" that are obvious native advertising - paid PR ads and press releases that mimick the look of news articles, features or blog entries. A BEFORE search does not turn up much other than social media, and the same paid covert advertising. Netherzone ( talk) 22:49, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: The article is devoid of independent, reliable sources required to satisfy WP:GNG.-- Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 12:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Now there are thousands of photographers not clear why is subject is notable fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 14:14, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete The subject doesn't meet notability criteria. Balon Greyjoy ( talk) 15:30, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • delete per nom Masterhatch ( talk) 05:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. 4meter4 ( talk) 00:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.