From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Andrea Haugen

Andrea Haugen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and probably WP:NMUSIC (at least to a point that a layman like me can tell, since it's not like most non-experts can tell what's a major label and what's not - but nothing in the article strikes me as obviously meeting NM). WP:BEFORE does not reveal any in-depth, major coverage. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:21, 31 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:24, 31 May 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:26, 31 May 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete – I can find no significant coverage to meet WP:BASIC/ WP:GNG and no other evidence of notability. Leviv ich 05:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I do find significant coverage, enough to meet WP:GNG: a solid paragraph (and possibly more - the page before is blanked in Google Books) about her work around 1995 in CAMION BLANC: ANTHOLOGIE DE L'AMBIENT D'Éric Satie à Moby : nappes, aéroports et paysages sonores [1]; 6 and a bit pages covering her work from 1994-2004 in CAMION NOIR: LOOKING FOR EUROPE Tome 2 [2]; 1 para about her book The Ancients Fire of Midgard in Imagining the Supernatural North [3] and another in Skinheads - Gothics - Rockabillies: Gewalt, Tod & Rock'n'Roll [4]; 2 paras about her and her involvements ca 1993 and later (before an interview with her), in Lucifer Rising: Sin, Devil Worship & Rock'n'Roll [5]; also a para in 'CHAPTER 9 Germanic Neopaganism – A Nordic Art-Religion?' of Norse Revival: Transformations of Germanic Neopaganism [6]; and there appears to be a lot in Schillerndes Dunkel: Geschichte, Entwicklung und Themen der Gothic Szene (her name appears on 8 pages, of which only snippets of 3 are visible on Google Books) [7]. There may be more - I have not searched on all the names of her albums, nor thoroughly on all the names she has used (Andrea Nebel, Andrea Meyer, Andrea Haugen, Andrea M. Haugen, Nebelhexë). The previous AfD discussion suggests that she would also meet WP:MUSIC#C5, with albums on more than one of the more important indie labels. If kept, the article would need significant editing for tone, tense, etc. RebeccaGreen ( talk) 15:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.