The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I considered speeding or PROD but, as this is a foreign subject, I'm not sure if it's simply unknown but my searches found nothing at all. Pinging
Godsy and
Jhona43 for comment.
SwisterTwistertalk 01:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment - can't find anything about it in English. The file it contains is up for deletion. I thought it might be a hoax last night; I just did a reverse image search on the logo, and found
some potential sources, albeit in Arabic. Unless those sources can be added and establish notability, I'd say deletion is probably the way to go. Could have put it up for
WP:A7, as was alluded to above, now that I think about it. Thanks for the ping.—
Godsy(
TALKCONT) 09:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
• Gene93k (
talk) 18:36, 12 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment - not difficult to find information about this club in the Arab media, such as
[1]. As such I'm not sure what the basis for the nomination is. Perhaps
User:SwisterTwister could put forward a policy-based argument?
Nfitz (
talk) 22:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Nfitz Simple, I'm not sure if this is notable or can even be improved.
SwisterTwistertalk 22:35, 12 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep or Userfy There is sufficient media coverage to warrant improvement. This article was nominated less than 24 hours after creation - hardly enough time to properly translate Arabic media coverage into English. I also note that the page creator was not notified of AfD nomination, so I have done so. —
Jkudlicktcs 04:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Jkudlick Well, I nominated it because I was alerted by the "hoax" tag and considering there's not much info and no sources (there's hardly much difference from the Arabic Wiki), I took it for commenting. Regarding translating, that's why it's better to start all together (I'm very conscious of bulking my edits as much as possible to lower unnecessary multiple edit clicks). Cheers,
SwisterTwistertalk 05:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - yes it exists, though I see neither sufficient media coverage or sporting achievements to merit notability.
GiantSnowman 09:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - For now, I can't see GNG unless someone is able to translate the foreign language sources.
Fenix down (
talk) 11:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - Clear failure of
WP:GNG. There is no absolute evidence that this team has competed at the highest level of national cup.
Spiderone 18:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.