From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Priceline Group#Acquisitions. J04n( talk page) 16:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Agoda.com

Agoda.com (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources for this company are problematic - there are some mentions in passing, and lots of press release/marketing material, but no serious, independent, in-depth coverage. The article was created for promotion (the creator declared in the edit summary "I am an Agoda employee based in Kuala Lumpur handling the communications of Agoda International...") and even after one AfD and 3 years it still smacks of promotion, because there is nothing else to say about the company - they haven't won any awards, the got acquired, and they were involved in a minor tax issue. At best, this could be soft deleted by redirecting to The Priceline Group. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:50, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 14:45, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 14:46, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:24, 19 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:43, 26 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, !dave 20:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.