The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 03:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep The label's roster suggests it meets
WP:MUSIC's sense of "one of the more important indie labels", and the Norwegian article on the label includes a couple of Norwegian-language sources. Referencing using Norwegian (and maybe German) sources is likely to be more fruitful than looking for English-language sources.
Chubbles (
talk) 18:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete I am unable to locate any
significant coverage with
in-depth information on the company and containing
independent content. Web searching can return results in multiple languages and everything I've located (and there are mostly PRIMARY sources) shows that the references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/
WP:NCORP.
HighKing++ 16:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SpartazHumbug! 10:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - Chubbles erroneously cites
WP:MUSIC which applies to musicians and not record labels. Record labels are subject to
WP:NCORP which requires
WP:SIGCOV in multiple sources and there is none.
Sulfurboy (
talk) 02:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.