- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 10:55, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Afiq Azuan
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Afiq Azuan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced BLP. Assuming the stats are correct, the subject never played in a fully professional league, thus failing WP:NFOOTY. Ymblanter ( talk) 07:53, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 10:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - I think this is this guy - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 10:30, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:59, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:00, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:00, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Isn't presumed notable per NFOOTY, as he hadn't played in the super league. While the subject has received fairly wide international coverage following his serious injury in a lighting strike on the turf - [1] [2] [3] [4] - per WP:BLP1E this doesn't make the bio notable. Furthermore, the event does not seem to pass WP:NEVENT (I don't see sustained coverage) and the article doesn't cover the event anyways - so there's little scope for renaming the article for the lightning strike event. The article (which is also titled wrong, I think) as presently construed could've been BLPPRODed. Icewhiz ( talk) 14:15, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.