The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete lets put this one out of its missery, clear BLP1E, other BLP issues
WP:BLPCRIME, WP:SNOW. .
Salix alba (
talk): 17:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete (if it isn't speedied first) fails GNG.
MarnetteD|
Talk 00:14, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Wouldn't object to him being mentioned on the main article about the riots but a standalone page is a bit much.
RexSueciae (
talk) 00:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, like the other individuals who are not notable other than for storming the capitol.
JayJayWhat did I do? 00:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 01:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete per nominator. Good grief, this could also be a defamation problem if it emerges that the subject is not the person photographed in the image. Very irresponsible article to create at this time IMHO.
BrxBrx(
talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}}) 03:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - The very definition of
WP:BLP1E. If an a few months people are still talking about his apparent involvement, then maybe he can be added to the protests page and a redirect created, but this is a clear BLP1E, ruling out a stand-alone article.
Hog FarmBacon 06:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete not enough gng for this individual.
cookie monster(2020)755 06:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
At this time, there is not enough coverage of Mr. Johnson to justify claims of notability. Delete.
DS (
talk) 07:08, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom and everyone else.
Love of Corey (
talk) 10:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - not a shred of notability
Spiderone 13:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
delete for lack of notability.
Starzoner (
talk) 16:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete per nom, above rationales, and
WP:BLPCRIME as explained by
BrxBrx above. warmly,
ezlev.talk 18:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete: He's just some super obscure, random doofus who is better known as "Via Getty" for a single picture. He's not even worth mentioning on the Storming of the Capitol page. DÅRTHBØTTØ (
T•
C) 20:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment: Significant coverage in
The Guardian,
Evening Standard,
New York Times,
Newsweek,
Forbes (staff),
BuzzFeed (dubious), mentions in
Vox. No doubt you could find ten times more coverage of such standard with more than 3 minutes of research. BLP1E is up for debate but draftifying or redirecting would be the solution if the issue is current sourcing. Likely this does warrant a mention at the main Capitol storming article (with the best level of sourcing). —
Bilorv (talk) 22:41, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.