The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Doesn't satisfy NCORP and CORPDEPTH. Web searches show results that are Adobe-related or another music company named
Acrobat Music UK, which as well doesn't seem to be very notable.
MT TrainTalk 11:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge and Redirect to
Matt Nathanson. All releases by this label (not be confused with
Acrobat Music) seem to be related to Nathanson, and the label itself has no independent notability, as demonstrated by the profound lack of coverage by independent, reliable sources.
YilloslimeTC 18:54, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Matt Nathanson – this is purely a vanity label for the artist, failing
WP:CORP, and I don't think there's anything to merge really. None of his albums or EPs before 2006 charted, but they all have articles, so they could probably be redirected as well.
Richard3120 (
talk) 22:05, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge and Redirect to
Matt Nathanson. This label has no independence or notability outside that artist.
78.26(
spin me /
revolutions) 14:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge and Delete I see no reason for a redirect.
HighKing++ 16:54, 5 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.