The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
JForget 22:29, 6 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep Album is by a notable band (they have their own article); it is on a notable label; it has at least one reference on it to back up its notability; they have five other album articles. Can I please urge people to consider starting merge discussions on the article talk page rather than bringing them here for outright deletion. That is what it says at both
WP:MUSIC and
WP:ALBUM if you really don't want to see artists have an article per album. – B.hotep •
talk• 20:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep Or redirect, but definitely not a delete - it's an album by a notable artist so therefore should redirect to the artist if insufficient information is available is available for a stand alone article. I couldn't find any reviews apart from a panning by allmusic and a few bloggy bits, but I'm sure they are out there, I didn't look that hard. Keep and improve is my opinion.
Dylanfromthenorth (
talk) 13:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep What B.hotep said. –
iridescent 14:11, 4 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep - Official album by a notable group, has at least one review in a {WWP:RS]], meets
WP:ALBUM. Even if it didn't, as
B.hotep states, a redirect rather than delete would have been appropriate, with no need for AfD.
Rlendog (
talk) 01:40, 5 September 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.