The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 12:16, 15 October 2014 (UTC) reply

AMS (Clothing)

AMS (Clothing) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the grandiose claims this company does not seem to be notable. The best source I found is this passing mention which provides no significant details. Huon ( talk) 22:49, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete - I suppose it is possible for the company to be notable and the relationships with various groups and organisations mean that it may well be one day. But I don't think we're there now and the current article is a horribly-written advertisement. St★lwart ¹¹¹ 23:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete. I don't see current evidence of notability -- and as noted, the article is just a few steps away from being a candidate for WP:TNT. -- Larry/Traveling_Man ( talk) 02:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete, possible CSD G11+A7: An article making grandiose claims (along with some sentences which are incoherent) but without evidence that it meets WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD ( talk) 07:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 09:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete - could be notable in the future but not now. Delete as inherently self-promotional. Fenix down ( talk) 11:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep - I believe it is notable as it manufactures the kit for two senior national teams. IJA ( talk) 16:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete as advertisement. Noteswork ( talk) 21:05, 10 October 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.