The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: I've added more information and sources. Please note
WP:NOTFINISHED: Wikipedia is a living document, constantly improving and expanding. It will never be a finished work.. Let us continue to improve upon this article, not delete it.
CLalgo (
talk) 08:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)reply
All the sources on the article currently are from the IJF or EJF, both of which are not independent of this event. This is a clear fail of WP:GNG.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk) 15:10, 21 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Not true. There is a JudoInside.com source as well.
CLalgo (
talk) 07:12, 22 August 2022 (UTC)reply
More over, I haven't found
WP:NOTDATABASE's &
WP:SIGCOV's relevance to this case. Please, see
WP:JUSTAPOLICY: While merely citing a policy or guideline may give other editors a clue as to what the reasoning is, it does not explain specifically how the policy applies to the discussion at hand. When asserting that an article should be deleted, it is important to explain why..
As JudoInside is a reliable, secondary source, SIGCOV\GNG falls. NOTDATABASE says nothing on sports articles as far as I can tell.
CLalgo (
talk) 08:41, 22 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Per
WP:NOTDATABASE. The sources provided by
CLalgo are not independent of the event in question, and I have yet to come across any coverage that suggests
WP:GNG is met.
♡RAFAEL♡(
talk) 03:47, 22 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:14, 25 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment There is no evidence that this topic deserves its own WP page. There is no significant independent coverage nor is there any reason to think this event for 15-17 year olds is historically significant. In fact, the article on the entire tournament has no significant independent coverage so I have difficulty supporting a redirect, although that's quite likely to be the result.
Papaursa (
talk) 22:44, 30 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.