Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2018–19_Chelsea_F.C._season References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Note that editors added source and context after nominating. ( non-admin closure) Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 20:44, 8 April 2018 (UTC) reply

2018–19 Chelsea F.C. season

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~No source~~
~~No context~~
2017–18 season is not over yet Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 14:13, 8 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 14:14, 8 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 14:14, 8 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 14:14, 8 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 14:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Keep The 2016-17 season article was created in April 13, 2017-18 was a bit later on May 8, so why delete this just to re-create in next week or even next month? By the time this discussion is over, there will already be many sources discussing next season. If we discuss for a couple of weeks and decide to delete, it's likely someone will put it back up within a day. I can find plenty of sources about Chelsea's 2018 summer and pre-season already. We can be sure that the 2018-19 Chelsea season is going to happen and will be notable per WP:NSEASONS. In the unlikely outcome that it doesn't happen or isn't notable, there will still be an article about why it didn't happen or wasn't notable. Just go with it. Jack N. Stock ( talk) 14:51, 8 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Keep on the basis that we know it would have been created very, very soon anyway and it's probably at the earliest date of creation where you can probably just about get away with it. Bungle ^{(
talk •
contribs)} 15:03, 8 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Keep, on the basis that they have already clinched a place in the 2018–19 Premier League and have started making arrangements for pre-season (the friendly in Australia). Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 15:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Keep I am in agreement, although this is early whats the point in deleting something to recreate it again a few weeks later. Govvy ( talk) 15:39, 8 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Keep The version when it was nominated was not sufficient as an article. However, after the expected event (friendly match) was added with citation, it seem sufficient as an article, despite more major content would only appeared after May. Matthew_hk t c 17:10, 8 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Keep seems pointless bureaucracy to delete this when pre-season matches are only three months away, at which point the article would get re-created -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 18:02, 8 April 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.