The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Sprawling sports stats article fails
WP:NOTSTATS. No evidence of independent notability. Content could be summarized in the main article. -
MrX 14:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep for now. This article has updated as it is an international (minor) tennis event held by WTA.
ApprenticeFanwork 15:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep – Meets
WP:NTENNIS. All WTA tour events have separate draw articles, and this would be one of them. Might seem empty but that is because tournament starts Monday.
Adamtt9 (
talk) 03:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)reply
WP:NTENNIS is a notabilty guideline for tennis players, not competitions.-
MrX 11:21, 16 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep – This would be a first... (
Gabinho>:) 06:00, 15 July 2017 (UTC))reply
Speedy Keep - Per project notability guidelines
[1] and the consensus on there being draw articles
[2]. In addition passes
WP:NOTSTATS, which states: "Where statistics are so lengthy as to impede the readability of the article, the statistics can be split into a separate article and summarized in the main article." This is the separate article in question, and the
main article will summarize the singles info.
El Pharao (
talk) 11:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)reply
As it says on the top of the page that you linked: "This WikiProject advice page is not a formal Wikipedia policy or guideline and may not represent Wikipedia community standards of practice.". -
MrX 11:21, 16 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Sorry about that bud, but you're seeing Wikipedia community standards of practice in action right here.
El Pharao (
talk) 17:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep – As above. By the way, do we need to delete every tennis draw? It doesn't make any sense. 333-blue 04:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep – Important and good article — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
M9154 (
talk •
contribs) 11:11, 17 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - Meets the guideline for tennis tournaments.
Coderzombie (
talk) 09:31, 19 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - Many discussions have established strong consensus for ATP and WTA draw articles. Supported by
Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines#Tournament. Hundreds of sources always exist after the event but if the article only lists the results then an official link to the draw is sufficient to reference the content.
PrimeHunter (
talk) 10:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - Really nothing has to said about this.
Matt294069is coming 11:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.