The result was keep. the consensus seems to be that enough information is known to satisfy CRYSTAL. How far in the future we should go with these sorts of articles for recurring events needs a more general discussion,. DGG ( talk ) 04:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Recreation of a previously deleted page. Too far in the future for a meaningful article to be started. While some regulatory changes have been forecast, there is no calendar, and only three drivers of which much could change for in the next two years. Falcadore ( talk) 13:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Expanded (26-03-12): As the content is essentially a coupy of the 2013 Formula One season article with minor ammendment and included a fair degree of unsourced rumour (the list of races for example which is very WP:CBALL) merging (per WP:Duplicate) the article into Formula One article future section is an alternative to deletion. -- Falcadore ( talk) 23:36, 25 March 2012 (UTC) reply
No, it's two years away. Back in 2006, Wikipedia had articles for the 2011 F1 season, and nobody deleted them did they? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PCH17 ( talk • contribs) 13:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep There is absolutely no reason that this article needs to be deleted. 2014 is going to see a lot of rule changes that need to be posted on this page. User:GeoJoe2000 —Preceding undated comment added 19:02, 3 April 2012 (UTC). reply