The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. There is no consensus to delete, and there appears to be a consensus to retain the page history. Any future merge is a matter for editorial discussion and does not require AfD.
SpinningSpark 21:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)reply
County cup season article - not notable
Kivo (
talk) 22:19, 25 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Spiderone 10:34, 26 October 2016 (UTC)reply
CommentWP:NSEASONS doesn't mention league or cup seasons, but rather individual team seasons, so I fail to see how it's relevant. --
SuperJew (
talk) 21:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Merge with relevant seasonal articles which in turn should be kept. This prejudice against Irish related footy articles needs to stop. It is getting ridiculous.
DjlnDjln (
talk) 16:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Merge with season articles. In the seasons and finals of the Leinster Senior Cup in question, all the top League of Ireland sides from Leinster competed and deemed them worthy enough of playing their strongest teams, therefore individual season articles are useful in giving more background info. --
IrishTennis (
talk) 16:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Since the individual cup seasons seem notable, the final would be notable too. --
SuperJew (
talk) 21:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - seems to be a notable match, and also per SuperJew's argument.
Inter&anthro (
talk) 19:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 16:46, 24 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - per SuperJew
Spiderone 13:18, 26 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Merge - Info that is now on the page could be merged. No reason for a seperate page at the moment.
MFriedman (
talk) 11:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.