From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Anyone wishing to create redirects is welcome to do so. Stifle ( talk) 16:21, 19 October 2013 (UTC) reply

2013–14 Manchester Premier Cup

2013–14 Manchester Premier Cup (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These are all season articles on a County Cup. There is a long-standing precedent that only national-level cup competitions get season articles; no evidence is presented here to prove that this particular cup deserves season articles.

2012–13 Manchester Premier Cup (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2011–12 Manchester Premier Cup (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2010–11 Manchester Premier Cup (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:02, 8 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo ( talk) 23:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all per nom, these seasons are not individually notable. Giant Snowman 08:46, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect - plausible search terms and whilst there is no need for this level of detail (especially as they are all essentially WP:NOT#STATS contraventions, a summary of each season's competition could be covered in the Cup article. Fenix down ( talk) 09:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Well only if there were significant reliable sources, then there would be a case for individual articles. At the moment, there seems only to be a need for a sentence or two. Fenix down ( talk) 10:02, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all Not notable enough to warrant separate articles. JMHamo ( talk) 10:30, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to the parent article. While the individual season doesn't warrant separate articles, as they could be summarized in the parent article, the titles are plausible search tearms and shold be kept as redirects. Mentoz86 ( talk) 09:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete—all. Yes, redirects are cheap, but what are the chances that someone is going to search starting with a year number and not just "Manchester Premier Cup"? The redirects are unnecessary, and set the stage for creating additional redirects for every other season, past and present. Livit Eh?/ What? 16:17, 15 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect, selectively merging as desirable, to Manchester Premier Cup. Redirects are cheap (cheaper than deletion, in fact). - The Bushranger One ping only 14:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.