The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per nom and previous consensus
here and
here, amongst many others. If it's not a team in a fully-pro league (i.e. outside of the Football League in England) then it does not merit a season article.
GiantSnowman 10:27, 25 August 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete -- The club may be sufficiently notable to have an article, but only teams in the top 4 (fully professional) leagues/divisions (i.e. below Football League) should be having anything more detailed like a seasonal article.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 22:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete - per nom, club does not play at a level anywhere near high enough to satisfy
WP:NSEASONS.
Delete: the club played at a level which does not receive enough coverage in independent sources to meet the GNG.
BigDom (
talk) 10:14, 27 August 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete - the nominator believes season-articles for clubs playing below the fourth tier are not notable, while I think the cut-off point is the fifth tier. Fortunately, this article is about a club that plays at the sixth' tier, so it can easily be deleted.
Mentoz86 (
talk) 23:19, 28 August 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete Season articles should only be allowed for clubs in fully pro leagues.
Number57 22:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.