The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unreferenced, non-notable individual season article, which fails
WP:GNG. Parent article previously at
AfD. Parent article should be kept, but these season content forks should be deleted.
JMHamo (
talk) 09:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)reply
I am also nominating the following article for the same reason given above.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
JMHamo (
talk) 09:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete these fork articles, no evidence of notability. At most they could be merged with the parent article.
GiantSnowman 10:11, 4 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment - Included in the parent article is a
Winners section, which I think is sufficient
JMHamo (
talk) 10:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete all - fail
WP:GNG and
WP:NSEASONS, not a team in a top professional league, no indication of any reliable sources discussing these clubs' particular seasons outside of
WP:ROUTINE match reporting. Major
WP:NOTSTATS issues as well due to the near complete lack of sourced prose.
Fenix down (
talk) 11:31, 9 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete all as lacking in depth coverage in reliable independent sources.
Stuartyeates (
talk) 08:15, 12 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.