- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
2004 Vaughan Shooters season
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2004 Vaughan Shooters season ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article fails the WP:GNG guidelines as the team competes in the semi-professional league which shouldn't allow seasonal articles. I will also be nominating these articles for the same reason:
- 2005 Vaughan Shooters season ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2006 Italia Shooters season ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2007 Italia Shooters season ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2008 Italia Shooters season ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2009 Italia Shooters season ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
HawkAussie ( talk) 23:58, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie ( talk) 23:58, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep From 1998 till at least 2019 the CPSL/CSL was the highest purely Canadian league, and since the main article qualifies as notable I believe the club should have seasonal articles. Shotgun pete ( talk) 1:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. 94rain Talk 01:40, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:47, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NSEASONS. The fact that this was the "highest level" is irrelevant, what we care about is the league being fully professional (this wasn't) and it receiving significant coverage (which it hasn't). Non-notable. Giant Snowman 19:49, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete or draftify depending on the outcome of the discussion - none of the coverage of the season appears to pass
WP:GNG as none of it appears independent, the article could be kept if the season was reliably covered in secondary media, but I don't see anything suggesting that's the case at the moment. @
Shotgun pete: Do you have any knowledge of newspaper articles or independent sources which would have covered this season reliably?
SportingFlyer
T·
C 06:06, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- I know for the 2007, 2008, 2009 seasons the club was covered regularly through the various Metroland Media Group newspapers. The articles could be found at their website here are some of the links.
[1] [2] Shotgun pete ( talk) 3:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NSEASONS failure. Number 5 7 10:59, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- DELETE Fails WP:NSEASONS. On the topic of 'regular coverage', WP:ROUTINE specifies that routine coverage of a sports team is not a sufficient basis for an article. As an aside, NSEASONS also specifies that if there is a seasonal page, i.e for a major team, then it should not be a collection of stats, which this page is so there is a content issue in addition to the notability one. ogenstein ( talk) 22:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.