The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn and no delete !votes. (
NAC) -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡
Hobbes 14:05, 15 August 2009 (UTC)reply
references displayed on the page are for a 1994 tournament, while the statistics of this page are for a 2006 tournament. I only found hits on random people involved with this tournament, not the tournament itself.
keystoneridin! (
talk) 17:18, 13 August 2009 (UTC)reply
I don't follow - which statistics are for 2006?
Eldumpo (
talk) 21:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep, as the
RSSSF link checks out, the statistics appear to be correct. I'm not sure what the basis is for the nomination given that.
Jmorrison230582 (
talk) 22:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions.
GiantSnowman 09:01, 14 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep - a notable tournament. The Supercopa de España looks to be the Spanish equivalent of the
FA Community Shield i.e. winner of the league vs. winner of the cup.
GiantSnowman 09:03, 14 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep - content of the article is clearly about the 1994 competition, and the one reference to 2006 in the first line was a typo, which I have corrected. And a tournament between two of the top teams in one of Europe's strongest football leagues is clearly notable and would have received bucketloads of coverage --
ChrisTheDude (
talk) 09:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes, one would suspect the creator copied & pasted the 2006 article across for uniformity, but he must've missed that date when altering it.
GiantSnowman 09:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep - Just correct the details and everything should be fine! –
PeeJay 12:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Nominator Withdrawn- Stats were fixed to show that the page was just written with a minor confusion.
keystoneridin! (
talk) 05:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.