The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 15:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply

1990–91 Bristol Rovers F.C. season

1990–91 Bristol Rovers F.C. season (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing in the article except an infobox. TheEditor867 ( talk) 09:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete (or draftify?) if no one comes forth and offers to write some actual content. —  Jeraphine Gryphon ^{( talk)} 09:30, 6 June 2015 (UTC) The article as it is in not ready for mainspace, it's not a real article, it's a test. I don't really know what's going on in that article, so if someone could just write one sentence in there, then I'll change my !vote.I forgot I didn't have this article watchlisted so I didn't see the improvements... —  Jeraphine Gryphon ^{( talk)} 07:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Keep —  Jeraphine Gryphon ^{( talk)} 07:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:56, 6 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• Keep - needs expanding, not deleting. Notable per WP:NSEASONS. Also why was the article creator not notified about this discussion? Giant Snowman 12:42, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply
• Keep - there's clear consensus that seasons articles are appropriate for teams in fully professional leagues. This if the second level of football in England! Nfitz ( talk) 01:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply
• Keep - notable per WP:NSEASONS, nomination goes against WP:PLENTY. Fenix down ( talk) 08:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.