The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
Fenix down (
talk) 21:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 14:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)reply
That AFD, as the closer noted, was a narrow consensus for a 9th tier team. This one is for a 5th tier team. It's not comparable!
Nfitz (
talk) 04:16, 30 August 2020 (UTC)reply
If you're looking for something comparable, there have been 18 AfDs on fifth tier seasons in the last month (
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18), all of which have ended in deletion.
Number57 11:40, 30 August 2020 (UTC)reply
These publications have pretty consistent independent coverage of the events of the season, obviously circulating around the liquidation. There are also plenty of snippet mentions in columns and other coverage. I don't have access to the British Newspaper Archive, but a basic search there also has some very promising possibilities from the time period. I think there's a strong case for
WP:GNG being met here.
Kosack (
talk) 14:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)reply
I've spent the morning adding what I can from the sources I mentioned. There are still a few Times articles left over, but the meat of the page is there now I feel to meet GNG.
Kosack (
talk) 09:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - significant coverage, as noted above - which isn't surprising as they'd just been demoted from Division 4, and had significant media coverage at the beginning of the season, and then again later in the season when they were expelled, and finally as the team went bankrupt.
Nfitz (
talk) 04:13, 30 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891TalkWork 13:39, 30 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Not sure we're going to get much more discussion here, but I'm not seeing consensus one way or the other at the moment.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Fenix down (
talk) 19:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - multiple coverage from national sources, so meets
WP:GNGChris (
talk) 06:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.