The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fan-centric article about an album that does not likely meet
WP:NALBUM, was previously a redirect to the band's discography. I'm bringing this here because
User:Onel5969 blanked it recently only for it to be restored.
FalconK (
talk) 05:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - Article is well sourced with several reviews. Assuming that the article can not be kept, it should be merged into
Saliva (band). --
Jax 0677 (
talk) 02:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)reply
I see only directory listings and press releases, far short of the significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that would be required for the sourcing to indicate notability.
FalconK (
talk) 02:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Thats an especially bad
WP:VAGUEWAVE argument. Outside of the short Blabbermouth article, these are all very obscure rock blogs. A stub with seven obscure blogs is most certainly not "well-sourced".
Sergecross73msg me 12:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Saliva (band). Fails
WP:NALBUM. Sources used in this article are not
reliable, let alone of high quality. I'd also recommend a protection over the redirect so that the article could not be restored,
HĐ (
talk) 11:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect - I couldn't find any reliable sourcing outside of the Blabbermouth source already in the article, and even that one is a pretty brief announcement that doesn't say much about the album.
Sergecross73msg me 12:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect to the band. Album does not pass
WP:NALBUM. And not nearly enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass
WP:GNG.
Onel5969TT me 12:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep: Sources in the article seem to be reliable (except for AllMusic, which doesn't have a review) and they talk about the album and indicate its track listing as well. That said, the article is good enough to pass
WP:NALBUM. ASTIG😎(
ICE T •
ICE CUBE) 16:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Which ones? And how are they reliable? There's no prior consensus exists on any except Blabbermouth. A quick look isn't promising.
"National Rock Review" has no professional credentials.
"Side Stage" has no precessional credentials. "Cryptic Rock" is actively listed at
WP:NOTRSMUSIC.
Sergecross73msg me 03:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.