Archives

Each archive consists of roughly 100 messages, by header. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 7 8

The following messages are archived. Please DO NOT modify these messages. If you have a message for the associated user, please go to their current talk page and post it there. Thank you.

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's December Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,000 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions, including a brand new one for the single largest wikified article! All you have to do is put an asterisk next to the largest article you've wikified, and coordinators will check its wordcount after the drive ends. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts December 1, and you can sign up today!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:38, 2 December 2011 (UTC). reply

		The Modest Barnstar
		For your (almost) 7000 word count in the Guild of Copy editors' November Backlog Elimination Drive. Thank you and happy editing! pluma Ø 02:37, 2 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Aw, thanks! If today were a light bulb, its... whatever the measure of intensity of visible light is called, would be doubled for me, now. Thanks! :D Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 04:09, 2 December 2011 (UTC) reply

		The Original Barnstar
		Awarded to Wilhelmina Will for copyediting the most articles (7) during the first day of the Guild of Copy Editors' November 2011 Backlog elimination drive. Well done! – Dianna ( talk)

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Wilhelmina Will for copy editing articles totalling over 4,000 words in the Guild of Copy Editors' November 2011 Backlog elimination drive. Thank you for participating! Dianna ( talk) 19:12, 3 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 21:03, 3 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Wilhelmina, A bot has tagged this photo and Iwant to correct it, but I'm not sure how small I need to make it. You had helped me before on Monjett Graham's page. Thank you! Thisandthem ( talk) 22:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Done! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 22:33, 3 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you! Thisandthem ( talk) 17:46, 4 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I want to start a wikiversity course called "Controversies in Science" for a university course I teach at Mount Royal University in Calgary Canada. I would be starting in January 2011. I've taught this course since Fall 2008, but this coming January will be the first time I will be using Wikiversity, although I have asked my current students to try it out last week (two did).

Here's a link to the wikiversity course so far: http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Controversies_in_Science

It's a course that looks at two sides of 13 different controversies, from scientists perspective.

I'm contacting 5 potential mentors that seem to have a broad interest including science that might be interested in helping my students and I.

Would you be interested?

If so, reply here or on my talk page. I would be happy to explain and discuss more. Areil314 ( talk) 22:42, 5 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Adventist Youth Society ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links to Spiritual, Mental, Camp, Fellowship, Bible studies and Devotional

2011 Beach South American Games ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links to Rugby, Handball, Spectator and Athlete

A.S. Films International ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links to Thriller, Conflict and Advisor

Aayudham Seivom ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links to Minister, Anjali and Traffic police

Walid Abdallah ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links to Domination, VDM and Verlag

2009 Loft Law Amendment ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links to Tenant and Compliance

Aguila (artist) ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links to Telecom and Conservator

1975 World Women's Handball Championship ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Handball

1999 United States federal budget ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Social Security

19th Street LBC Compilation ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Long Beach

20 Hoxton Square ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Platform

6 inch (15.2 cm) /47 Mark 16 guns ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Monobloc

A.S. Pushkin Brest State University ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Brest

AGM-64 Hornet ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Battlefield

Abithana Chintamani ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Founder

Activity selection problem ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Disjoint

Ad Dawadimi ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Rehabilitation

Adept (band) ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Demo

Admonition ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Fine

Age Concern Cymru and Help the Aged in Wales ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Charity

Chris Ahrens (rower) ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Olympic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:40, 7 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello, after having a look at your edits, I feel there is a need for you to improve your wikification. I have spotted evidence of neglect in some of the articles, one of which is Alberton Cemetery South Australia -- it needs to be retitled to "Alberton Cemetery (South Australia)", copyedited ie "On 17th November 1847", "granted 4 acres" and "The Anglican Diocesan of Adelaide Archives". Another article is 1996 New York Underground Film Festival, which needs to have a {{Stub}} and its Wikify banner removed. Marián Aguilera, Al-Yarmouk Teaching Hospital, Alavi Bohra . Schroeder Audio, Inc. could be copy-editted to comply with MoS (I'm really surprised that you, as a copy-editor, didn't picked up the problems). As for Access Control Service, I see a glaring copyright violation, and that the article is lacking {{Refimprove|date=December 2011}}. I have also noticed that you haven't addressed the issue raised above by DPL bot. All in all, I think your wikification could vastly be improved.

I'm going to assume good faith over your edits, which I think were a bit rushed, and wait for you to rectify your mistakes. If you see that I've made any mistakes, please tell me. -- Sp33dyphil © ^hat _ontributions 08:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Sorry if I sounded a bit harsh, but I didn't mean to sadden you -- I just wanted you to realise your mistakes, and that you've got a lot of potential. If you think my message was harsh, just say it in front of me. -- Sp33dyphil © ^hat _ontributions 09:10, 9 December 2011 (UTC) reply

The problems concerning the wikification of an article have been taken care of. I don't really see why I would need to copyedit the articles this month, when the drive is for wikification. If any of them have been tagged for copyediting, I can take care of that in January. Also, I can't see how my wikifications can be "rushed" when you've done over 75 more than I have in the same time, and received no complaints. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:05, 10 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Furthermore, that disambiguation helper is gummed up. It replaced all of the punctuation and wikitext in Adventist Youth Society with these: # When someone fixes that device, then I'll take care of the links. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:13, 10 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your reply. If you see that I haven't been editing up to standards by not following the ten or so steps on the WIKIFY main page, please don't hesitate to tell me. Thank you -- Sp33dyphil © ^hat _ontributions 05:09, 10 December 2011 (UTC) reply

And as for the "gummed up" (:o) bot, well, I have addressed some of the issues that it raised on my talk page, and when I pressed "check to confirm", there were no problems. Hmm, I don't see what the matter is. -- Sp33dyphil © ^hat _ontributions 05:13, 10 December 2011 (UTC) reply

For the copy-edit problem, you might as well give it a thorough shakeout because 1) you have visited the article 2) the article might not have a copy-edit tag which would notify you once the next copy-edit drive comes, and 3) you copy-edit not because of the drives, but to improve substandard articles. You don't have to copy-edit the articles though -- I just wish that you would. -- Sp33dyphil © ^hat _ontributions 05:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC) reply

To un-gum the disambiguation helper, it is suggested that you use a web browser other than Internet Explorer. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:54, 15 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Guild of Copy Editors November 2011 backlog elimination drive report Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors November 2011 Backlog elimination drive! We would like to thank all who participated in this drive. Here is the end-of-drive report. Participation There were 48 editors who signed-up for this drive, of which 35 participated. Thank you to everyone who helped reduce the size of the backlog! Progress report During the drive, we reduced the backlog by 232 articles, or by about 6%. This is a two percent increase from our September drive, when we copy edited 4% of the backlog. We were successful in our primary goal of clearing the oldest three months—March, April, and May 2010—from the queue. Thanks to all who helped copy edit these difficult articles. Thus far we have reduced the copy edit backlog by 5086 articles, or by about 61%. End-of-drive results and barnstar information can be found here. Coordinator election The term of our second tranche of coordinators has run out, and we will be accepting nominations from December 5, 00:01 UTC to December 15, 23:59 UTC. If you or any other member of the Guild of Copy Editors wishes to be a coordinator, add your name to this page along with a statement describing why you believe you should be a coordinator for the Guild. You must be able to commit to a six month term. Thanks! Once again, thank you for participating in the Guild's November 2011 Backlog elimination drive! Our next drive will be in January, and we hope to see you there! Your drive coordinators – Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02 and SMasters

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
-- Kumioko ( talk) 03:38, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your valiant efforts to improve coverage of moths. Keep it up it is very much appreciated!! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Oh my! Thank you very much! :D Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 02:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Anisothrix grenadensis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Species epithet

Blepharocerus chilensis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Species epithet

Caphys arizonensis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Species epithet

Jeff Rowley ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Jiu Jitsu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:12, 18 December 2011 (UTC) reply

All clear! Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 22:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Elections are currently underway for our third tranche of Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, 16 December – 23:59 UTC, 31 December. All GOCE members, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are five candidates vying for four positions. Your vote really matters! Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 11:42, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar. Sorry for sounding a bit harsh with my criticism above; I can remove the dabs for you if you like. Merry Christmas, and have a Happy New Year -- Sp33dyphil © ^hat _ontributions 08:40, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply

P.S. What's your New Year's resolution?

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for Endotricha melanchroa, on behalf of all the snouth moths, who so rarely get to speak for themselves. Drmies ( talk) 08:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello Wilhelmina! Thumbs up for all the work you are doing. I am trying to keep up and add info to the pages you create. Could you do me a favour and use funet as a ref for the Endotricha genus, instead of the usual database? The funet page seems to be 90% better in this case. See: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/pyraloidea/pyralidae/pyralinae/endotricha/index.html Thanks! Ruigeroeland ( talk) 09:08, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Sure thing! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 09:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Great! And best wishes to you too! Ruigeroeland ( talk) 09:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the message, and merry christmas to you too! Here's a nice pudding ;-) benzband ( talk) 09:45, 25 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Mmmm, good pudding! Thanks! Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 09:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Elegia relictella ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Canton

Endotricha ellisoni ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Congo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:36, 25 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the Christmas wishes!-- ¿3fam ily6 _contribs 15:42, 25 December 2011 (UTC) reply

	Little bitty baby beagle
	Thanks for the wikilove! You put a smile on my face. (^_^) Have a happy Yule! Braincricket ( talk) 18:04, 25 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Aw, what a cutie! Thank you! Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 09:34, 28 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Pinkstrawberry02™ ^talk 01:10, 26 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Please reply to this message on User_talk:Pinkstrawberry02's talk page. Thank you, and happy holidays!

Thank you, very much! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 09:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC) reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Luponde, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.luponde.co.uk/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot ( talk) 06:54, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I have opted out this message because it is a false positive. Happy editing! -- Katarighe ( Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 18:07, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply

	Happy New Year!
	Happy new year and we will see you contributing in 2012 of the new year. We are hoping to see and help to make Wikipedia better! Katarighe ( Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 22:57, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Endotricha borneoensis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Malaya

Endotricha coreacealis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Amboina

Endotricha pyrrhaema ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Amboina

Endotricha semirubrica ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Malaya

Endotricha wammeralis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aru

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:10, 1 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Guild of Copy Editors 2011 Year-End Report We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2011. Read all about these in the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report. Highlights Membership grows to 764 editors, an increase of 261 Report on coordinators' elections Around 1,000 articles removed through six Backlog elimination drives Guild Plans for 2012 Requests page report Sign up for the January 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Get your copy of the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report here On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. We look forward to your support in 2012! – Your 2011 Coordinators: Diannaa (lead), The Utahraptor, and Slon02 and SMasters (emeritus).

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Millonario Alta Tension.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{ helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 17:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Moshi Urban, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Karanga and Kaloleni ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Taken care of! Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 22:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help! Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2399 submissions waiting to be reviewed. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Are you autoconfirmed? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation using AWB on 20:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Belated thanks for helping out with the GA review on Hermann Fegelein! your efforts are appreciated. Dianna ( talk) 05:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Oh my, thank you! How did you know lattice-top is my favourite pie design? ;) Thanks! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 10:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Euzophera afflictella ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Amur

Euzophera batangensis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Batang

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC) reply

I have removed two of the good article reviews you have claimed, as they are effectively just rubber-stamping with little critical review work done. This is most certainly not to say that the reviews were poor ones (I've not checked the articles, so it would be wrong of me to judge in that regard) merely that they are not eligible for points in the WikiCup. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks, J Milburn ( talk) 22:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC) reply

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
-- Kumi-Taskbot ( talk) 18:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Nolelover ^{Talk· Contribs} 15:46, 21 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank You! ... And, these are for you. – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 08:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC) reply

		The Greater Working Wikifier's Barnstar
		For wikifying a full 95 pages during the drive, and coming into fourth place on the leaderboard, Wilhelmina Will. Great work! – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 08:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC) reply

		The Gold Wikification Barnstar
		Since 95 is over 90 by 5 (In scholastic terms, this would probably be an A+++++!) (^____^) I hereby award you the Gold Wikification Barnstar! Well done & Thank YOU! – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 08:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you, very much! I'd better get back to that prize-dishing now! Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 02:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you, Will, for saving the day (and of course for the stars). I see pjoef got here first -oh well, cheers, benzband ( talk) 20:27, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Arbat-Opera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olga Ivanova ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC) reply

First of all:

Those were much appreciated. :) Next...

		The Original Barnstar
		For going above and beyond the call of duty...ahh, who am I kidding. For saving my tail and volunteering where no others did, this barnstar is given to Wilhelmina Will for helping WWF out and dishing out barnstars, late as they might have been. Thank you! Nolelover Talk· Contribs 15:52, 24 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Aw, thank you! Any time a substitute dish-out is required, just drop me a line! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 00:59, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Eugene Eisenmann at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{ db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot ( talk) 15:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Great Scott, I knew I forgot something. You're a very good little bot; consider yourself patted on the head! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 00:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC) reply

It's purring :) Shubinator ( talk) 18:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Is there any chance you could help clear some of the backlog you have created at Category:Missing taxobox? -- Stemonitis ( talk) 18:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply

For the record, 57 pages hardly registers as a backlog; even if it did, the category ought to have a backlog-indicating tag at the top. I don't usually add taxoboxes for extinct animals because I am not knowledgeable when it comes to categorizing creatures by class, family, order, or other levels of classification beneath kingdom and above genus. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 00:35, 29 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Using and modifying the information used in the taxoboxes for the extant species, I added in taxoboxes for the extinct Galaxias species. If I have time later on, I'll try and add in ones for the others. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 00:50, 29 January 2012 (UTC) reply

For the record, anything above zero is a backlog; the category should be empty as far as possible, and it usually is. Perhaps the point here is that if you can't place the taxon properly, then creating a sub-stub just to turn a link blue in an article like 2012 in paleontology really isn't helpful. The amount of work involved in creating stubs the way you have been doing is much less than the effort needed to clean them up afterwards (and negligible compared to the effort of making decent, informative articles). That is, you create more work for other people than you carry out yourself, which equates to a net loss. That seems irresponsible to me. Thanks for fixing the Galaxias species, though; I look forward to seeing the remaining articles cleaned up, too. -- Stemonitis ( talk) 04:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Anatrachyntis oxyptila ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to New Ireland

Euzophera subnitidella ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Altai

Galasa major ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Columbia

Nanolestes ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Oxfordian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:14, 29 January 2012 (UTC) reply

I dont know which source you used to create the last batch of genera (perhaps the list of Pyralidae genera?), but these contains about 50% synonyms. I suggest not using this list until all genera from the world database and funet have been added to wikipedia. If these are all done, only the valid genera which are not found on the world database and funet would remain, since I always add the synonyms. Thanks! Ruigeroeland ( talk) 12:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Actually, I only googled those names, Ruigeroeland. If you think it's better to let them rest till the rest of the job's done, however, then that's what I'll do. Cheers! Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Okay. Still probably best though. Both funet and the database are in no way perfect, but the genus synonyms seem to check out most of the time. Keep it up! If this is done we will have the worlds best resource for this family. Ruigeroeland ( talk) 08:05, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi Wilhelmina: just to be sure: could you leave the genus Zophodia and related genera mentioned in the genus to me? They are proving to be challenging (i.e. it is quite the puzzle to find out what species belongs to what genus). If you just make the article without doing any further research it will probably turn out to belong somewhere else or even be a synonym. Thanks! Ruigeroeland ( talk) 15:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Okey-doke! Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 02:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply

On 30 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article UAE Five, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Amnesty International recruited writers to lobby at the Edinburgh Festival for the release of the UAE Five, imprisoned in 2011 for insulting political figures of the United Arab Emirates? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/UAE Five. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you! Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply

On 31 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Olaus Verelius, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the 17th-century Swedish scholars Olaus Verelius and Johannes Schefferus disputed bitterly over the location of the heathen temple at Uppsala? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Olaus Verelius. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady ( talk) 08:04, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Assassin'S creed ^{T - E - C - G -} 19:25, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply

WikiCup 2012 is off to a flying start. At the time of writing, we have 112 contestants; comparable to last year, but slightly fewer than 2010. Signups will remain open for another week, after which time they will be closed for this year. Our currrent far-away leader is Grapple X ( submissions), due mostly to his work on a slew of good articles about The X-Files; there remain many such articles waiting to be reviewed at good article candidates. Second place is currently held by Ruby2010 ( submissions), whose points come mostly from good articles about television episodes, although good article reviews, did you knows and an article about a baroness round out the score. In third place is Jivesh boodhun ( submissions), who has scored 200 points for his work on a single featured article, as well as points for work on others, mostly in the area of pop music. In all, nine users have 100 or more points. However, at the other end of the scale, there are still dozens of participants who are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly!

The 64 highest scoring participants will advance to round 2 in a month's time. There, they will be split into eight random groups of eight. The score needed to reach the next round is not at all clear; last year, 8 points guaranteed a place. The year before, 20.

A few participants and their work warrant a mention for achieving "firsts" in this competition.

• 12george1 ( submissions) was the first to score, with his good article review of Illinois v. McArthur.
• 12george1 ( submissions) was also the first to score points for an article, thanks to his work on Hurricane Debby (1982)- now a good article. Tropical storms have featured heavily in the Cup, and good articles currently have a relatively fast turnaround time for reviews.
• Sp33dyphil ( submissions) was the first to score points for a did you know, with Russian submarine K-114 Tula. Military history is another subject which has seen a lot of Cup activity.
• Sp33dyphil ( submissions) is also the first person to successfully claim bonus points. Terminator 2: Judgment Day is now a good article, and was eligible for bonus points because the subject was covered on more than 20 other Wikipedias at the start of the competition. It is fantastic to see bonus points being claimed so early!
• Speciate ( submissions) was the first to score points for an In the News entry, with Paedophryne amauensis. The lead image from the article was also used on the main page for a time, and it's certainly eye-catching!
• Jivesh boodhun ( submissions) was the first to score points for a featured article, and is, at the moment, the only competitor to claim for one. The article, "Halo" (Beyoncé Knowles song), was also worth double points because of its wide coverage. While this is an article that Jivesh and others have worked on for some time, it is undeniable that he has put considerable work into it this year, pushing it over the edge.

We are yet to see any featured lists, featured topics or good topics, but this is unsurprising; firstly, the nomination processes with each of these can take some time, and, secondly, it can take a considerable amount of time to work content to this level. In a similar vein, we have seen only one featured article. The requirement that content must have been worked on this year to be eligible means that we did not expect to see these at the start of the competition. No points have been claimed for featured portals or pictures, but these are not content types which are often claimed; the former has never made a big impact on the WikiCup, while the latter has not done so since 2009's competition.

A quick rules clarification before the regular notices: If you are concerned that another user is claiming points inappropriately, please contact a judge to take a look at the article. Competitors policing one another can create a bad atmosphere, and may lead to inconsistencies and mistakes. Rest assured that we, the judges, are making an effort to check submissions, but it is possible that we will miss something. On a loosely related note: If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:22, 1 February 2012 (UTC) reply

		Leaderboard Award – Number of articles edited – 5th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Wilhelmina Will for copy editing 34 articles during the January 2012 GOCE drive. Congratulations on winning this prestigious award. Thank you for your hard work. -- Dianna ( talk) 22:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Wilhelmina Will for copy editing articles totalling 12000 words during the January 2012 GOCE drive. Thank you for all you do for the Guild. Dianna ( talk) 22:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you, very much! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 00:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC) reply

On 4 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Salix alaxensis, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in some areas of northern Alaska, the willow species Salix alaxensis (twig pictured) constitutes over 95% of winter food for moose? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salix alaxensis. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 00:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 00:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi, you need to check your copy/pasting. You're stating that species in Hyperparachma are in Hypargia. Ladyof Shalott 03:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Aw, shucks! Thought I'd changed that. Well, thanks for letting me know! Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 03:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC) reply

You're welcome! :) Ladyof Shalott 04:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:TheJakovasaurs.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 04:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1782 Edict of Tolerance ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mixed marriage

1974 Everest Disaster ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sherpa

1990 North Star Conference Women's Basketball Tournament ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Green Bay

A7 road (Northern Ireland) ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Newcastle

Herculia incarnatalis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Herculia

Herculia nigrivitta ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Herculia

Herculia rubidalis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Herculia

Herculia tabidalis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Herculia

Hypochalcia decorella ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Europa

The 7th Hunt ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sadist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of Gregory P. McGuckin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 14:51, 6 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi, Wilhelmina Will! As you may know, the Wikipedia Education Program has instilled a new set of standards that courses must meet to officially join the program for the semester. As you can see, one of the requirements is that at least one ambassador or professor is a Wikipedian, as this should give students more access to helpful information about contributing to Wikipedia and creating good content. You are listed on the Online Ambassador page; are you still interested in remaining active this semester? Some of these classes will have to remove themselves from the program should they fail to meet these standards, but we would like to ensure that new students are receiving proper support during the editing process. Please let me know if you are still interested in mentoring these students this semester and/or visit the Online Ambassador talk page to select a course that still needs an Online Ambassador. Thank you! JMathewson (WMF) ( talk) 20:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC) reply

If you make Tortricidae species articles, could you please add the authorities from the genus pages, they are all there so it is not hard to find them? Furthermore, it is very easy to find all synonyms (at http://www.tortricidae.com/), it would be a great help if you would add them. Ruigeroeland ( talk) 11:21, 8 February 2012 (UTC) reply

On 9 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Freedom Neruda, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that journalist Freedom Neruda was imprisoned in 1996 for satirizing the Ivorian President, but was named one of the "50 World Press Freedom Heroes" in 2000? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Freedom Neruda. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady ( talk) 10:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 12:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply

In Craspedites you use period, when the Berriasian is an age, you place the Misthodotes in the Permian era, when it is a period, etc., etc. with a lot of articles you created.

If you preview, then click on the geological time name, you can find out in the first sentence whether it is a period or age. If you're not willing to do this, since you are just creating one line stubs, you can just say Berriasian, rather than Berriasian Period. Getting the information wrong is worse than no information. Pseudofusulina ( talk) 16:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Note It appears you created a lot of articles with the wrong names for the times. I have posted at a Wikiproject to find editors to correct the articles. I don't know how many paleontology stubs you have created and the scope of the problem. I suggest you just leave off the epoch/period/etc. for future new articles, as you link the name in the articles, and that will tell the interested reader the information. Pseudofusulina ( talk) 17:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I raised the issue for discussion here in case there are a lot of articles that need corrected. Pseudofusulina ( talk) 19:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks, you're getting it, and you're catching on to the trickier ones. Pseudofusulina ( talk) 23:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC) reply

On 10 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eugene Eisenmann, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Eugene Eisenmann worked as a lawyer before writing The Species of Middle American Birds for the Linnaean Society of New York? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eugene Eisenmann. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 09:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 10:47, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi, as you're creating a lot of articles, I thought that you might like to know about Template:Automatic taxobox, which could save you a lot of typing! Martin ( Smith609 –  Talk) 14:05, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you, that's very thoughtful! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Guild of Copy Editors January 2012 backlog elimination drive Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors January 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Here is your end-of-drive wrap-up newsletter. Participation 45 people signed up for this drive this time; of these, 35 participated. This is similar to the number of editors who helped out in November. Thanks to all who participated! Barnstars will be distributed in the near future. Progress report Recent drives have been focusing on the oldest three months in the backlog. During this drive we were successful in eliminating our target months—July, August, and September 2010—from the queue, and there are less than 300 articles remaining from 2010. End-of-drive results and barnstar information can be found here. When working on the backlog, please keep in mind that there are options other than copy editing available; some articles may be candidates for deletion, or may not be suitable for copy editing at this time for other reasons. The {{ GOCEreviewed}} tag can be placed on any article you find to be totally uneditable, and you can nominate for deletion any that you discover to be copyright violations or completely unintelligible. If you need help deciding what to do, please contact any of the coordinators. Thank you for participating in the January 2012 drive! All contributions are appreciated. Our next copy edit drive will be in March. Your drive coordinators – The Utahraptor talk, S Masters ( talk), Diannaa ( Talk), Stfg ( Talk), Sp33dyphil ( talk), and Dank ( talk)

		The Bio-star
		Thanks for improving Wikipedia's biology-related articles when you created Immyrla rectilineella. Your work is appreciated! Northamerica1000 (talk) 11:48, 11 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you, very very much! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Acroangiodermatitis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Compression therapy and Ulcer

2001 World Women's Handball Championship ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Handball

ACIF ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indexing

Abu Hafsa Yazid ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Arabian history

Acting in ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Destructive behaviors

Ahmed Abdalla ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Winger

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Volume I, Issue III February 2012 Front cover | Feature | News and announcements | Humor | Want ads To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.

Ruigeroeland ( talk) 10:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

On 13 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aegisuchus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the flat-headed crocodilian relative Aegisuchus had a circular projection on top of its skull that may have served as an eyespot in mating displays? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aegisuchus.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber ( talk · contribs) 08:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 09:40, 13 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks! I love cookies! And happy valentines day to you too! Ruigeroeland ( talk) 10:27, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

---

Yummy Cookies! Thank You!

“	Love, then, hath every bliss in store; 'Tis friendship, and 'tis something more. Each other every wish they give; Not to know love is not to live.	”
—  John Gay (1685–1732), Fable LXIII: "PLUTUS, CUPID, AND TIME", Fables (1727)

Have a wonderful Valentine's Day filled with love, fun and parties. – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 12:22, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

	Happy Valentine's Day
	All the best for one of Wikipedia's best! (Feel free to send this to your other Valentines)

Forget cookies, you get a giant heart! I guess you can imagine it's made of cookies, with icing in John Gay's words above.

Feel free to, uh, tone it down at any point. Nolelover ^{Talk· Contribs} 13:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for them yummy cookies, and happy Valentine's Day to you too! benzband ( talk) 15:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of Jennifer Worth at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! –  Muboshgu ( talk) 18:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Northamerica1000 ^(talk) 08:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply

	Most Excellent Wikification Award
	The Most Excellent Wikification Award is hereby granted to Wilhelmina Will, for their achievement in appearing on the WikiProject Wikify drives' leaderboard the most times (6) in 2011. Thank you for your noble service! Kerowyn Leave a note 19:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Oh my! Thank you! Thank you very much! Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:51, 17 February 2012 (UTC) reply

	Most Excellent Wikification Award
	The Most Excellent Wikification Award is hereby granted to Wilhelmina Will , for their service in participating in all of WikiProject Wikify's drives in 2011. Thank you for your noble service! Kerowyn Leave a note 19:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC) reply

My my, what a day! Allow me to take a curtsy for the crowd! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi Wilhelmina Will, Thank you for the yummy cookies. Made my day here on Wiki! Thisandthem ( talk) 01:13, 17 February 2012 (UTC) reply

You're most welcome! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Akrofonso ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Yam, Cocoa and Cocoyam

Adampur, Pratapgarh, Uttar Pradesh ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sai River

Aire de mise en valeur de l'architecture et du paysage ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Urban

Hypsotropa heterocerella ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Punjab

Lamida obscura ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Canton

Lascelina cordobensis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cordoba

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:14, 19 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their March 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on March 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on March 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate the remaining 2010 articles from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, Stfg, and Coordinator emeritus SMasters. 19:58, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply >>> Sign up now <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Hi Wilhelmina.. I was afraid you might produce short stubs on the Saturniidae species, since I made the genus articles. Could I ask you not to do that though? Most of these species generally have quite some info available, and at the rate you are making these articles I cannot keep up expanding them. If I leave them as you made them, there is a big chance they will be turned into redirects, since you include no info at all. If you like to make articles on these species, please find some info online. There is a lot available since these are the most conspicuous moth species in the world. Ruigeroeland ( talk) 12:18, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hmmm, forget that. There is not that much info available as I thought. At least for the bunch of African species you made. One thing though: could you add the Subfamily category (I made categories for all subfamilies), add a category for "Animals described in..." and the authorities (you already did for most). It saves me a lot of repetitive work if I do not need to add these. I will take care of the distribution and additional info as usual. Thanks! Ruigeroeland ( talk) 13:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

On 23 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gregory P. McGuckin, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that New Jersey Assemblyman Gregory P. McGuckin is the son of the first directly elected mayor of Brick Township, New Jersey? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gregory P. McGuckin. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber ( talk · contribs) 08:02, 23 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi, I see you are preparing to review my GAN at Talk:Gordon P. Saville/GA2. We are both WikiCup competitors, and I noticed that you are standing at about #40 in points. The top 64 competitors will be promoted to round #2 and I think you will make the cut with your present total. However, if you want to get the review out of the way before the end of February, you can get another couple of points as insurance. On the other hand, if you wait until round #2 in March when everybody's points are reset to zero, the points will be put to good use there. It's up to you! You can wait a week or you can do the review sooner. Binksternet ( talk) 05:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Actually, waiting till the second round is not a bad idea, if you're alright with it. Thanks for the suggestion! Hope to see you in that round! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 07:06, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I'm okay with it. :)

Binksternet ( talk) 07:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I notice you have recently created articles for another two fossil crustacean genera, and they are both largely untrue. To claim that Coleia occurred (only) in the Sinemurian is simply false; for instance, Garassino et al. (2012; doi: 10.1127/0077-7749/2012/0209) show that the genus continued until at least the Early Cretaceous. Similarly, the authority is not "Schweigert & Ernst, 2012", but "Broderip, 1835". Your article, mentioning only one of c. 30 species, is so skewed and unrepresentative that I think it would be better to delete it than to allow it to misinform readers. Goniodromites is a similar case. That genus was erected by Reuss in 1858, not "Starzyk, Krzemiska & Krzemiski, 2012", and contains more than a dozen species, of which G. kubai is probably the least important. The presence of a red link in articles like 2012 in paleontology are not a bad thing; misleading readers, however, is. This is not the first time I have brought this kind of thing up, and I have explained before the amount of effort needed to clean up such articles to a state worthy of retention. If you cannot write accurate, insightful articles, then I think it would be better if you found other ways to contribute to Wikipedia. -- Stemonitis ( talk) 07:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Very well then, I'll look into adding the other species to the articles tomorrow. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 07:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Also, adding in who described the new species is perfectly alright, but if I put them in as the genus authorities, then that was

a subconcious act. I am used to creating new genera articles. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 07:57, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The thing is this seems very similar to the editing behavior that lead to your 2008 topic ban. You don't actually understand the information in the articles, and clearly are not reading them, but rather skim the titles/abstracts. This results in the very poor stubs Stemonitis is talking about. Please do not create articles on paleontology topics.-- Kev min § 19:11, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I have run across the same problem with your articles where I am correcting your geological time. I am not going to correct any more problems with your use of geological time, although I appreciate that you tried to heed my advice above, because I am concerned that by further editing the article other editors may think that my editing was done to remove more than problems with time. A couple of your articles that I edited might need deleted, and the latest couple of bot results concerns me. I do admire that you are willing to add new species stubs, but I think the paleontology ones are not a good area for you. Pseudofusulina ( talk) 22:38, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I have fixed the two crustacean articles Stemonitis has pointed out, as I said I would. If you would like, I'll periodically go through the other 2012 extinct taxon articles I've made, that have similar problems, and fix those. There is no valid reason to delete articles that can simply be improved, as are these. Also, for the record:

• I have done what you told me to do, Pseudofusulina, with regards to the geological time, so don't say that that's still a problem.
• Kevmin, as long as I take more time with each of the paleontology articles I create, and not just "skim over them" as you worded it, I see no reason why I cannot continue making them. That used to be the bulk of my contributions years ago, and everyone used to tell me I did a good job with them - I believe even you did. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 00:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

  As I stated above, twice, I think you did a good job with the problems with geological time, because you stopped adding the names of the units as I requested--although you didn't communicate about the issue, but instead required that I check all your edits to see if you had done it. There are still a few problems with the time scale, but you appear to be reading my edit summaries and moving forward correctly. Again, a little communication would help, rather than making me guess every time that you got the message. But, whatever on that one.

  So, on to the issue here. I think correcting the articles would take me more time than writing them; I'm not an expert in invertebrate paleontology, and I wound up having to do too much research to try to correct your articles. If I edit them, these other editors may think they don't have to review them for errors. I think the wikipedia consensus on inaccuracies is that having nothing is better than having it wrong. Pseudofusulina ( talk) 01:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Ah yes, but having it right rules over both of those options. As I said, I'm willing to take more time with any I might make in future, and I am also willing to go over the ones I've already made - one or two at minimum a day, on average - and fix whatever might be wrong. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Then I am willing to help you if you want to continue creating paleontology articles. I bet you can learn how to work around the errors that are causing issues. Pseudofusulina ( talk) 01:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Yes, that would be nice, sometime. Thank you. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

On 24 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jennifer Worth, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that British midwife and bestselling author Jennifer Worth criticized Mike Leigh's 2004 film Vera Drake for depicting an "invariably fatal" method of abortion as quick and painless for women? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jennifer Worth. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 08:04, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 08:05, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Special Barnstar
	For your excellent contributions to the project! Keep up the great work! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:57, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you, very much! :D Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 03:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi Wilhelmina - just letting you know fyi that the project tag you added to Talk:Picavus, a fossil bird genus, was for the Lepidoptera project. I have noticed you doing this a couple of times previously. I guess that if you create a lot of lepidoptera articles it is momentary absentmindedness and not a major problem; I have done the same thing myself occasionally. I have fixed the ones I have noticed. Cheers. Maias ( talk) 01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Darn, I thought I caught myself every time I did that. Subconcious habit is a canid female, I'm afraid. Thank you! Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:20, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Endoclita malabaricus ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Rosa, Mallotus and Cassia

Maria Alford ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Belton, Prince's Gate and Francis Egerton

5526 AMS ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to G6 and ASAM

Able Newspaper ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Sexuality and Nassau County

Ghabat ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Land registry and Lassa

Aaron Crane: Paintings Come Alive ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to HDD

Abortion in Hungary ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ministry of Health

Afri-tech ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Networking

Al-minhaal academy ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Islamic school

Al Melgard ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Barton

Alexandria Again and Forever ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Director

Coleia ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Decapod

Elusa antennata ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elusa

Elusa binocula ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elusa

Elusa ceneusalis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elusa

Elusa confusa ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elusa

Elusa cyathicornis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elusa

Elusa diloba ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elusa

Elusa dinawa ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elusa

Elusa flammans ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elusa

Endoclita damor ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nyssa

Endoclita excrescens ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Castanea

Endoclita sinensis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Castanea

Goniodromites ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Oxfordian

Henry Adams (Braintree) ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Devonshire

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I'm sorry, I have had to remove all of the DYK articles for which you have claimed, as none of them featured significant work from you. Drive-by nominations are not eligible for points. I'm sorry to do this at this late stage in the round, meaning that you will now be eliminated, but this has always been the rule in the WikiCup, and is made quite clear on at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and in regular communications. I'm sure you can appreciate why this is the case- this is a content creation competition, not a content finding competition, and if drive-by nominations were permitted, someone who watches the new page log all day would almost be certain to win. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks, J Milburn ( talk) 20:56, 29 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I hesitate to contradict you, good sir, but it was not made clear in the scoring page. From what it told me, "drive-by nominations" were permitted. Ah well, I wish you had informed me sooner, for I feel now as though I were led on by Fate, but I will step down graciously now, and wish good luck to the other participants. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 22:57, 29 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Round 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was Grapple X ( submissions), again thanks mostly to a swathe of good articles on The X-Files. In second place was Tigerboy1966 ( submissions), thanks an impressive list of did you knows about racehorses. Both scored over 400 points. Following behind with over 300 points were Ruby2010 ( submissions), Cwmhiraeth ( submissions), Miyagawa ( submissions) and Casliber ( submissions). February also saw the competition's first featured list: List of colleges and universities in North Dakota, from Ruby2010 ( submissions). At the other end of the scale, 11 points was enough to secure a place in this round, and some contestants with 10 points made it into the round on a tiebreaker. This is higher than the 8 points that were needed last year, but lower than the 20 points required the year before. The number of points required to progress to round 3 will be significantly higher.

The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design.

The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which would otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn ( talk • email) and The ed17 ( talk • email) 00:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC) reply

— Bagumba ( talk) 02:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC) reply

If you're going to fix the articles you have created, it might be polite if you did so before I implemented my own solution, rather than wasting my time by undoing all my edits, purely to recreate short and largely uninformative articles. The taxoboxes for Strigulla, Cucullistriga, Rasstriga and Scutistriga are still incomplete and misleading, because they do not contain the authorities for the genera, and do not deal with monotypic taxa appropriately. It is also inconsistent to treat these four genera in such a way, while leaving the other genera in the family mergerd into the family article. Moreover, what little information you have added could have been easily accommodated in the family article I created; indeed, it would be more useful for the reader to present it in that way. It is entirely unclear to me why you insist on all these genera having separate articles, when they could so easily be merged, and when that merger had already been carried out. Unless you can fix these problems rapidly, I will have to re-merge the genera into a single, much more useful family article. -- Stemonitis ( talk) 07:37, 2 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Rapidly? I can work more on the articles if that is your wish, but I fail to see why you think there is such a rush. Also, I was not aware any genera pages for that family existed, other than the ones I made - how was I to know without any links?

Furthermore, I have never understood why you are so hasty to merge an article when there's the possibility that it can be expanded instead. Remember Periclimenes dardanicola? You were quick to merge it when it was small, but when I counteracted and persuaded you, it was expanded, and became a DYK! The articles come with a source which probably gives in-depth information on their subjects, but I am unable to access it at present. I have said this in gist to all editors of your sort that I've encountered throughout my time on Wikipedia: I would rather have multiple individual stubs which cover basic information and can be expanded gradually over time, than all of the articles in Wikipedia blended into one, impossibly long page. Don't give up paradise to put up a parking lot.

Besides, what's more, I've even seen you create crustacean articles which you then left as stubs, so don't try to tell me you are 100% against it. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 11:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Most of the stubs I create are to help navigation between articles (you will find I use the edit summary "create linker stub" in such cases). I never create a series of stubs which could be happily merged into one useful article. There are differing philosophies about Wikipedia, and yours is clearly different from mine, which is not a problem. The problem is that you seem only to work on expanding an article after it has been merged. It would be far better to work on the ones that have not been dealt with, of which there are still quite a few. I have never been opposed to expanding articles, even ones that have previously been merged, but experience suggests that you rarely do so. I doubt that P. dardanicola would have expanded beyond the 17 words "Periclimenes dardanicola is a species of shrimp. It was first named by Bruce and Okuno in 2006." unless I had stepped in, and your list of creations shows that the vast majority of articles you create remain as stubs almost indefinitely. It shouldn't be up to other editors to make you work on particulr articles. Content creation is much more important than page creation, and if you can fit everything you want to say about the genera in a family on one page, then you should do so. The idea that we're talking about "one, impossibly long page" is an obvious straw man; no-one has ever suggested such as absurdity. The system you advocate is hardly "paradise"; mine is hardly "a parking lot". What I'm suggesting is putting the scraps of information that you've added to Strigulla, etc., into the article Idelinellidae. There is plenty of room there, and it would provide more context about each than separate pages would achieve.

This may seem harsh, but perhaps trying to write articles when you don't have access to the sources is not a very good idea. Almost all the context and information about these taxa is only in the body of the paper, not in the abstract, so it's almost impossible to write a decent article without it. There are people around who can supply papers on request (I forget where, but I can find out). -- Stemonitis ( talk) 11:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC) reply

And yet, other short paleontology articles I've made you've accepted. Mild COI, or is there something I've missed per chance? I don't expand most of the articles I start off because I don't have time. Also, with Lepidoptera pages if you're referring to those, Ruigeroeland is much more knowledgeable about lepidoptera than I am - I'm just helping him out. He expands those articles with what info he can find, and also determines which genera and species are presently held as valid taxon. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 11:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Really? That is perhaps even more of a worry. I would have thought it was important to determine that a taxon was valid before writing an article about it. Invalid taxa are not generally notable, so should not normally be included in Wikipedia (there may be exceptions). I don't understand the COI question. I take it you mean "conflict of interest", but I am not aware of any. I also suspect that "accept" may not be true. I often don't have time to fix every problem I see. Some of them may have been acceptable, but without knowing which articles you mean, I can't say what my opinion of them might be. -- Stemonitis ( talk) 12:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Oh, how you are making my head throb. Things change over time - sometimes species that were listed years ago are renamed or synonymized - Ruigeroeland checks over all of this and moves or redirects the content accordingly. You might not find small genera pages acceptable but a good deal of editors do. Can we not just agree to disagree on this and leave everything as it is? Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 22:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC) reply

The problem is not with the pages being small per se, but with the misinformation and lack of context that they contain. Jimbo Wales has stated that it is better for Wikipedia to have no information than false information – I forget his exact wording. For instance, I have just discovered that your article on Coleia claimed it had a stratigraphic range of just "Sinemurian", which is decidedly untrue; the range of the genus is much, much wider than that. Your genus articles frequently conflate the genus with a single (usually new) species, and so end up misleading the reader. Your articles on monotypic taxa fail to make it clear that there is only one species (if there is only one species, referring to it as the "type species" can be misleading, because it suggests the presence of others, whereas stating it is the only species automatically indicates that it is the type). Your unmerged articles give no indication of what kind of animal the article is about; they provide no context and are thus uninformative. None of this is something over which we can "agree to disagree". -- Stemonitis ( talk) 08:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC) reply

As far as I could tell, it was all correct. If you notice something incorrect or incomplete, why can't you just change it to what is correct? If the genus existed through a longer period than that, edit the page so it says that. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 10:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC) reply

But what were you basing it on? What could have led you to believe that the genus Coleia had such a restricted stratigraphic range? I can change things, and I do (you will see that the range is fixed at Coleia, although the article does give far too much weight to that one new species), but I don't always have time, and you should not rely on other people to fix mistakes. It is far better to avoid making mistakes in the first place, even if that means leaving articles unwritten. I am getting more and more worried about your editing, if you persistently write articles about speciose genera as if they contained only one species, if you write about invalid taxa, and if you cannot recognise obvious errors. I don't know what the best solution is, but I slightly resent your take other editors' time to clear up afterwards, especially when their work is then undone for no obvious reason. -- Stemonitis ( talk) 16:00, 3 March 2012 (UTC) reply

What led me to think that was that the only time range I noticed mentioned in the sources was Sinemurian. If I had noticed any of the sources mentioned those other ranges, I would have included them as well. To say it existed in the Sinemurian, by the way, is not wrong if it did exist during that time - what would have been wrong would be to say, for example, that something that existed solely in the Cretaceous also existed in the Triassic. I already said in the previous message, a few up on this page, that I was willing to look over these paleontology pages from 2012 and fill them in more. If you had read that message, perhaps you could have refrained from getting ahead of me, and this whole row could have been prevented.

I am very hurt that you seem to paint me as a bad editor - my intentions for Wikipedia are no worse than I presume yours to be. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 06:10, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Yes, the only time range mentioned in the paper was Sinemurian, but it explicitly stated that that was the range for the species, not the whole genus. That's exactly the kind of error I'm talking about. And to state that the genus has a range of "Sinemurian" is wrong, because the reader will expect to see the whole range. If I wrote that "Homo sapiens is a species of primate found on Madagascar", then it would be hugely misleading, and the same is true of stratigraphic ranges. I don't doubt that your intentions are to the benefit of Wikipedia; I just doubt that that's the effect. You said that you would look over the palaeontological articles, but you haven't done much of that. Category:Missing taxobox still contains many of your articles, and you only started to work on the genera of Idenellidae after I had fixed that problem. What makes you think these problems are limited to your pages from 2012? You have created nearly 6,000 articles, most of them little-viewed stubs. I am not especially confident that the rest of those will be any more error-free than the latest bunch. Certainly, I think your current pattern of editing cannot continue into the future, but I don't know how to deal with the backlog of untrustworthy articles. What do you propose? -- Stemonitis ( talk) 07:10, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Exactly what I proposed before. Working on a couple of them each day, when nothing prevents me, and doing all I can do in a sitting for an article, before moving to the next. If you want, I'll work on the ones in the missing taxobox category first. I do not intend to pause on creating new pages however - maybe slowing down in the average quantity I do each day, so I can put more work into each one, for a while. I trust, for example, that you would not mind if I more frequently made the articles along the lines of Protemblemaria perla or the Blacktail triplefin? I hope you have no complaints with either of those articles in their present states, because I really did try to make them as best as I could, for start-class articles.

I won't be able to start on improving the stubs right this second, because it's getting close to when I retire for the night, but tomorrow after Church, if circumstances permit, I have it in my mind to. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 10:32, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Those two articles do seem to be above your usual standard, yes. There are a couple of smallish things that one might change, but nothing very serious (only one taxon can be the " sister species" of P. perla, for instance, and it's P. punctata, not P. bicirrus; blacktail triplefin talks about "the other locale", but goes on to list an enormous range). I welcome your commitment to help clear up, but I wonder why you limit it to "for a while". If I were made aware that I had added falsehoods to Wikipedia, I would make it a priority to fix them before doing anything else, particularly if that other task was likely to replicate the error. Yes, please do begin with those missing taxoboxes, but please don't stop there. Every species has had a description published, with some idea of its range; there is always much more to say than just "[A] is a species of [B]". Please make sure that your articles on genera do not dwell on a single species unless they are monotypic; please make sure that they explain the monotypy if they are. Please make sure you are using up-to-date taxonomy, cited to an authoritative source. There are plenty of people around who can provide help and advice, if you need it. -- Stemonitis ( talk) 10:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply

The correcting of the articles was not what I said I would do for a while. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Ah, then I misunderstood. Can I take it, however, that you will engage in that cleanup? -- Stemonitis ( talk) 07:11, 5 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Yes. I've already started, as you will see by the elimination of two pages from the Missing Taxobox category. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 07:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyeswikimedia.org.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 02:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Sure thing! I'll look into that soon! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 02:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC) reply

On 4 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chuck Berry House, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Chuck Berry House is an unusual inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, in that it is associated with a living person? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chuck Berry House. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber ( talk · contribs) 17:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you! :) Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 01:46, 5 March 2012 (UTC) reply