On 3 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1989 kidnapping of Rubaiya Sayeed, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

-- howcheng { chat} 19:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC) reply

On October 19, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vishnu Bhagwat, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 01:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC) reply

On 23 September, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nivedita Bhasin, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

-- Srik e it ^{( Talk | Email)} 19:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as KALBELIA DANCE (RAJASTHAN), but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing!

Kappa

• Actually this might not be your fault, if you took it out of Indian folk dances. Unfortunately that page seems to be an un-noticed copyright violation too :( Kappa 12:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Welcome!

Hello, Shyamsunder/Archive 2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  deeptrivia ( talk) 12:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC) reply

deeptrivia ( talk) 12:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC) reply

User:Urshyam

• I want to appericiate your work done for page of Khatushyamji. May i know something about you.. if u want to tell me than mail me at s.b.agarwal@gmail.com

Thank you Shyam

Hi Syamsundar,

Today you removed sourced content on bikaner history ironically all about Jats ,why???

I think you will be aware of the fact that Jats ruled Bikaner for more than 1000yrs and rajputs for 500yrs, than why content on rajputs also not deleted on the same time???

Bikaner was formed with the coilation of Bika rajput and Nehra or Nera Jats, thus Bika + Nera = Bikaner ,so why sorced info about jats deleted???

You say all that additions about jats should be on History of Bikaner section, than why info on rajputs is on main article??? It should also be on History of bikaner section then????

Do you have any proof of Gujara-Pratihara clan ruling bikaner or jangladesh, if you do have than provide, WP:POV wont work on here !

thanks -- Last Emperor ( talk) 12:54, 3 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The article List of people from Punjab (India) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be an exact copy of List of Punjabis, with all the Pakistanis axed out. Utterly unnecessary WP:CFORK.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Glenfarclas  ( talk) 06:57, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply

I have nominated List of people from Punjab (India), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people from Punjab (India). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Glenfarclas  ( talk) 19:13, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply

I have reverted your removal of Category:Civil wars involving the states and peoples of Asia from the article and category of the Naxalite-Maoist insurgency. If you wish to discuss the rationale for having or not having this categoriy assoiated with the two, I suggest Talk:Civil war would be an appropriate venue for such a discussion. __ meco ( talk) 13:27, 7 May 2010 (UTC) reply

• On the article page for Rajkumar College, Rajkot, a category of was deleted recently. Can you help me understand if a ' Category:Boarding schools in India ' , would be appropriate on this page.

Patelurology2 ( talk) 17:18, 19 May 2010 (UTC) Patelurology2 ( talk) 23:39, 19 May 2010 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, Gajanand Rajput, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gajanand Rajput. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. jmcw ( talk) 12:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Shyamsundar,

TASMAC is not a liquor manufacturer. It buys liquor wholesale from breweries . So i dont think it can be categorized as a brewery.-- Sodabottle ( talk) 06:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Alcohol in India is fine. :-)-- Sodabottle ( talk) 06:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Currently Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation is a redirect to TASMAC. TASMAC is the cognomen - it has even entered popular culture as a word (mostly used derogatively) and even in governtment and media reports no one uses the full name. This would be the search term commonly used. So i named the article per WP:COMMONNAME. we should be using the more commonly used term right?-- Sodabottle ( talk) 07:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The editor originally claimed to be Digvigay Singh, and none of their edits (including their original attempts at removing the controversy section) is sourced. Everard Proudfoot ( talk) 22:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Digvijay_Singh_.28politician.29. Everard Proudfoot ( talk) 22:10, 13 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 02:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Category:Songs by language of India, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 15:30, 21 June 2010 (UTC) reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jaipur Municipal Corporation, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080817051347AACvn6T. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 10:33, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi friend, just wondering why you removed category Shopping malls in India from Korum Mall, [[Raghuleela Mall‎] etc?

Ditto for Category:Colleges in India. You emptied the entire category but did not delete the page. Wondering where I went wrong with this. Thank you.-- Forty two— ▮▮ 04:44, 14 August 2010 (UTC) reply

neutral notification Collect ( talk) 12:58, 14 July 2010 (UTC) reply

An IP voted in this AFD discussion using your name. Since this discussion has been edited by multiple sockpuppet accounts, I was hoping you could confirm that this was indeed you who made this vote. If not, please feel free to delete the comment attributed to you. Thank you. Hairhorn ( talk) 02:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC) reply

I have nominated List of Indian muslims, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indian muslims. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Qwyrxian ( talk) 08:53, 29 August 2010 (UTC) reply

thanks for your cogent comments at this afd. I know we cant canvass, but if you know how to have this afd listed at various forums, please do that. I have no idea how to accomplish that. As i wrote, i have some problems with the structure and format of the list, but am more than willing to fix it up a bit. i tend to be passionate about standardizing lists of notable people. dont know why im drawn to them, i image all of us that edit a lot on WP have some obsessive compulsive tendencies :) Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 05:48, 30 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Dal bati churma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Substance of this article, almost word-for-word, but with additional information, already incorporated as a section of the article Baati.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 22:25, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply

I am really annoyed with the decision to delete this page, as you may imagine. i dont think any of the BLP issues were unfixable. I really dont understand why people think that labelling someone a Muslim without sources is slander. its like when a woman called Barack Obama a Muslim, and john mccain defended him but made it sound like if he WAS a muslim, it WOULD have been a bad thing. Im not going to protest its deletion, but i just find it weird that we delete this one, but dont delete other lists just like it with equal passion. thanks for your support. You do probably know that there are ways to request admin oversight on deletion reviews, right? if you decide to do so (your call, im ok either way), let me know and i will participate. And, i still want to know: in india, is it patently obvious to most people when someone is a Muslim, by their name, or even their ethnicity, or some other matter? Thus, do people not bother to comment on it so much? Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 18:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your personal take on my question. i believe you. i agree there was no consensus in this afd, and i think the existence of so many similar articles means it would be better to open up a dialoge, i think its a "request for comment" somewhere. again, if you ever want to try to do so, notify me, and i will participate. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 03:12, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi Shyamsunder! Thank you for correcting the title of Gavri Bai—I thought it was incorrect, but was not familiar enough to make the right correction to the article. Cheers!  :-)   Thorncrag  21:14, 19 September 2010 (UTC) reply

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of National Commission to review the working of the Constitution, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.whatisindia.com/issues/gconrevi/index.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot ( talk) 12:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC) reply

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		for single-handedly categorising all India related articles from Kashmir to Kanyakumari. you are simply great. I wish we had more editors like you. -- Car Tick 01:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC) reply

you are welcome. -- Car Tick 11:58, 9 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Category:Pre Islamic history of Afghanistan, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 17:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The article M.I.Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Admrboltz ( talk) 19:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I noticed that you created Category:Indian photography, so I populated it a little. (I'm sure that there are plenty more photographers who could be added; I just couldn't think of them immediately.)

That inspired me to create " Category:Japanese photography". I did so, and started to populate that.

But then I suddenly decided that " Category:Photography in Japan" was a better title, populated that, and depopulated and killed off "Category:Japanese photography".

I preferred the new title because it unambiguously includes photography by the (very?) non-Japanese within Japan. I didn't want somebody objecting (for example) "Bruce Gilden was in Japan but what he was doing there wasn't Japanese but American photography."

Before "Category:Indian photography" is much populated, what do you think about "Category:Photography in India"? If you prefer it, I'd be happy to help you with the name change.

I've adapted the text I wrote for "my" (!) category and copied it to yours; I hope it seems helpful. -- Hoary ( talk) 13:38, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I was in two minds about the name of the category . I checked names of the other countries. I noted American photography and British photography and like So I went with precedent and named it Indian photography. I prefer Photography in India and am okay if anyone changes it to that. Shyamsunder ( talk) 19:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Done! Actually I think the other cats should be changed similarly ("British photography" to "Photography in Britain", etc), but there are only so many hours in the day. -- Hoary ( talk) 21:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I've populated Category:Photography in India a little more. There are probably yet more people (etc) who could be added, but unfortunately I know very little about India. -- Hoary ( talk) 22:07, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks. Shyamsunder ( talk) 02:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Several notable British photographers worked at one time or another in India. Let's imagine for a moment that Wikipedia had articles on a large number of them. Here I suggest that Category:Indian photographers and Category:British photographers in India should belong to Category:Photographers in India, which itself should be part of Category:Photography in India. Of course I hope that you agree, but I'd happily consider any better idea that you might have. Please comment there. Thanks. -- Hoary ( talk) 13:12, 27 October 2010 (UTC) reply

It has been proposed to move Ganges to Ganga. Please contribute to the discussion. Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 13:12, 18 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi,

I have somewhat enhanced the article Illegal immigration in India. Please review and comment on the talk page if the NPOV banner can be removed.

Thanks -- Iball ( talk) 16:34, 22 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The article 1981 Karnataka liquor deaths has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is more of a news article, than an encyclopedia entry

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MikeLynch ( talk) 17:53, 18 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Category:Siblings of national leaders, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello Shyamsunder,

Thanks a lot for categorising my articles. I have been seeing you in the history of articles created by me. My article Southwick, Ooty has a proposed issue with notability. Could you help me with increasing the notability of the article coz I live in that place and i know everything about it, but i cant seem to include referenceable content sourced from the internet.

Regards

Suraj ( talk) 12:17, 5 January 2011 (UTC) reply

HI! i think this article points to something general to india. every year many people die (in almost all states) due to consumption of illegal liquor. -- Onef9day ^Talk! 14:17, 5 January 2011 (UTC) reply

I'll create a stub on Junaid sait..thnks..-- Suraj ( talk) 13:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi, just a note: please be careful with the category "Ancient Indian literature". I'm not sure what "ancient" means, but literature from the medieval period certainly shouldn't be categorized as "ancient". For instance, the Hitopadesha dates from the 12th century; this is not ancient! You've also added the category "Sanskrit texts" to "Ancient Indian literature", but not everything in that category is ancient. Shreevatsa ( talk) 07:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply

It would be good to have some definition for Category:Ancient Indian literature since you created the category: what exactly counts as "ancient" according to you? For instance you have placed Category:Jain texts in the category, but to pick a random article from the category, there's Atma Siddhi which was composed in the nineteenth century… rather recently! It's awkward having categories without defining what the category means. Shreevatsa ( talk) 10:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply

The definition is already there in the parent Category:Ancient India which is "This category contains the pages relating to history of India before arrival of Islam in India in 8th century". Hope this helps. Shyamsunder ( talk) 11:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Hmm. While I'm not happy with that periodisation (I'd really like for "ancient" to mean the pre-Gupta period), that's probably a matter for historians. :-) I've edited the category page to include the definition — it's always useful to add this, so that others know what pages/subcategories can be added to that category. Regards, Shreevatsa ( talk) 11:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Any kind of images will be good -- company headquarters, products, people (for example, see Google or Microsoft). As part of the WikiX celebrations in Mumbai, we're encouraging users to upload Mumbai-related photographs. People can easily get photographs of their locality, school/college or workplace. I'm trying to create a list of articles that have no photographs, at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Mumbai. utcursch | talk 11:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply

		The Categorisation Barnstar
		For your tireless work in categorising articles across the length and breadth of India. Cheers! Why so serious? Talk to me 04:53, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks. Actually I gained all this knowledge that I have by reading wikipedia articles and related discussions and have hence developed it into a hobby. But I have no knowledge on the history of Indian aviation. :( Thanks once again. Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 09:29, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Could you elaborate at Template talk:Top Indian companies what you feel it would take to make the template useful? I agree that in its current state it's weak, and would like to see others' suggestions. — Brianhe ( talk) 01:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Category:Mercantile_law, don't remove the category tag. You are mixing Indian Law with other laws. You must know that every country has different rules and regulations. In India Negotiable Instruments Act is the part of :Mercantile law. Topics/Acts which are part of :Mercantile_law are Negotiable Instruments Act, Contract Act, Labour Law. You have mixing American, England, European and others law with Indian Law. I am not conflicting with that and request you not to remove mercantile_law category.
Vineet Gupta, Advocate, 605, Sector 10D, Chandigarh [India] 04:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello Shyamsunder. I note that you created the Category:Schools by city. I started a discussion on it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools#Category:Schools by city because I was not sure in what way I could improve this category by inclusion of further subcategories. Some participants in the discussion seemed to think that it does not make sense for many countries to categorise schools by city, and therefore questioned whether this category makes sense at all. I was wondering whether you would like to add your opinions to this discussion. Coyets ( talk) 17:08, 6 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi,

I have a request for you. Could you help to fix the article on Pankaj Mullick?

Thanks,

GhanaDa ( talk) 20:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Requesting you to check a page you have contributed to: Romola Butalia?

Can you check if you think it should have the promotional tone tag, or notability tag, after the reference tags added? Could you please do the needful? Thanks for your help. L Ahuja ( talk) 18:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)L Ahuja reply

I have undid some of your category deletions on some of my articles. Please put up such changes for review on discussion page of the article before actually deleting categories from my articles. I suppose that would be a good Wikipedia practice. abhishek singh ( talk) 00:57, 25 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I just wanted to know how you know that new page requires categorization? KuwarOnline ^Talk 11:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, P.J.Thomas (CVC). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - P. J. Thomas (politician). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at P.J.Thomas(CVC) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Suri 100 13:30, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

The article 1981 Karnataka liquor deaths has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No meaningful content . Illicit liquor deaths have happened many times and are somewhat common in India.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Suri 100 08:16, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Herostratus ( talk) 14:04, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply

AbhisheksinghWIKI has given you a fresh pie! Pies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a fresh pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thank you for your help on Wikipedia To spread more WikiLove, install the WikiLove user script.

See my proposal to rename Category:Freight rail transport in India Hugo999 ( talk) 10:45, 27 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Category:Categories by state of India, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon ^{( talk)} 17:21, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Shyamsunder,

AshLin here, another colleague from the subcontinent. :)

I was happy to see your numerous edits on Indian Railways and am awarding you this barnstar for an unrecognised facet of your work.

I also noticed an edit of yours and I respectfully disagree with your removal of categories from History of rail transport in India. A person looking for the history of rail transport in India would not look for it in History of rail transport by country but would search for it in Category:Indian Railways and Category:Rail transport in India. I also feel that this article should figure high in the category tree and should be retained in these two categories for that reason and not just nested deep into the history of rail transport in India category. So, I am reverting your edits. If you feel that you would like to remove the categories again, I respect that and request we continue this discussion on the talk page of the article.

Happy editing, my friend.

AshLin ( talk) 03:08, 30 March 2011 (UTC) reply

		The Railways Barnstar
		For user Shyamsunder, for your many edits on Indian rail topics. AshLin ( talk) 03:08, 30 March 2011 (UTC) reply

hi Shyamsunder! i need some help regarding rajasthani people. Please review it for Good Article and let me know what changes i need. thanks -- Onef9day ^Talk! 18:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC) reply

I just need to know "Why have you removed this Visitors attractions in India by city category from Visitors attractions in Sambalpur Category, do you have any explanation for this? or you are simply trying to increase your edit counts by doing unnecessary edits using Hotcat? You don't justify your edits also, I take this behavior as reckless editing!" This is not the first time I have observed you activity for quite sometime and I am reporting this. One possible explanation you will now add is that "Sambalpur is not a City!" my answer to this is "Who are we to decide, what's the definition of a city?"

I would request you to kindly undo such edits and refrain from editing in such careless manner.-- [[++@adikka ( talk) 02:53, 10 April 2011 (UTC) reply

On that note, if you must have a "horse breeds originating in India" category (and WPEQ doesn't feel these national cats are needed, they just cause edit wars, what if the breed originated in Ancient India but modern Pakistan??) at least PLEASE do not remove the parent category "horse breeds." We need it for proper navigation and maintenance. Montanabw ^(talk) 21:46, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply

I suggest you see Category:Presidency of Barack Obama and like categories to better appreciate what should be added to such categories for Indian prime ministers like V P Singh administration and others. Thanks Shyamsunder ( talk) 06:37, 17 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the suggestion. I had looked at various categories under Category:Categories named after politicians. The categories relevant to India remain in the fledgling stage. Will be working on some of them. Karnan ( talk) 17:02, 17 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Category:V. P. Singh administration is not a category named after the politician. In example given there is a separate category Category:Barack Obama. Shyamsunder ( talk) 20:56, 17 April 2011 (UTC) reply

And the latter includes Category:Presidency of Barack Obama. I had looked at those too. Karnan ( talk) 00:01, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Could you please categorise this article. Thanks, — Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 06:56, 18 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padmanabhapuram Palace. ╟─ Treasury Tag► stannator─╢ 11:30, 20 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Shyamsunder, Thanks for taking the trouble to appropriately categorize the ESI article.. The category 'Insurance in India' is very appropriate. However, ESI has no bearing with labour relations. It is a separate corporate entity that oversees the medical and disablement benefits of industrial workers. It's a contributory scheme in which the employees, employers and the government all contribute.. As there is no appropriate sub-category in 'Industry in India' category, I added it.. -- Longhairandabeard ( talk) 05:15, 27 April 2011 (UTC) reply

I need your help, Some of the other 'good' wikipedians from developed countries are not properly understanding the importance of articles in Indian context and have been resisting my edits and contributions. Though i am working on improving my quality of contributions, I think your being in the circle will make things some easier for me.

Recently User talk:PMDrive1061 deleted my talk subpage User talk:Maheshkumaryadav/List of schools in districts of India. The page was not having any offensive contents, but was edited to perfection by me for three hours. The deletion of contents from 'main' domain can be understandable, but is deleting my subpage which i was planning to use fair. Has he violated any rules. Mahesh Kumar Yadav ( talk) 18:24, 10 May 2011 (UTC) reply

• I've taken care of that. He had it titled as an article talk page; I deleted it as an orphan. I would never have otherwise deleted his subpage. Thanks for helping with this editor. He's enthusiastic as all get-out, but he needs some guidance. PMDrive1061 ( talk) 14:38, 11 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for resolving the copyvio issue at Rock Garden. I am afraid that myself and several others are between a rock and a garden hard place at the moment in trying to clean up a trail of stuff and are sometimes having to take a rather black-white view of things. You are probably aware that there are a huge number of articles that require review in this area and, of course, in the case of copyvios, the basic rule is "remove on sight but fix if you can". We're going to get it wrong some times, although on this occasion it was not so much getting it wrong as simply wilting under the sheer scale of the task. It has been a frustrating few days and has consumed a lot of hours that could have been spent in more productive areas. Your efforts in fixing the article are much appreciated. No-one wants to see an article about a notable subject deleted. - Sitush ( talk) 23:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello. You are invited to take part in a 'Gordion knot vote' with three options on the future title of List of Indian inventions and discoveries. Regards Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 09:50, 14 May 2011 (UTC) reply

I left you some information about the comments you left at User Talk:Maheshkumaryadav. Qwyrxian ( talk) 03:56, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply

If we can decide the fate of Talk:Chandigarh Capital Region, then we can pretty much wrap up User:Anna Frodesiak/Silver sandbox. There remains one or two non-Chandigarh Capital Region-related items there, but if we can sort out the CCR ones, then we can paste silver into a collapsebox at M's talk, and move on from this tragedy. Best wishes to all. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:26, 6 June 2011 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, Vetal Hill in Pune , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Rishabh Tatiraju ( talk) 09:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Category:BRICS, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:18, 9 June 2011 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International cricketers of Indian origin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International cricketers of Indian origin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. St Anselm ( talk) 06:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC) reply

naveenpf ( talk) 02:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC) reply

	The Categories Bharat Ratna
	For categorization of India related articles and lists Zuggernaut ( talk) 13:35, 8 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi, you recently undid revision 438303727 of this category by me. The text you deleted was:

The main article for this category is List of Indian institutions of higher education

Now, I forgot to wikilink but the article List of Indian institutions of higher education does exist. I was merely trying to add some text to the category page in accordance with Wikipedia:Categorization#Content of category pages.

Was this text inappropriate for the page? Please elaborate.

If not, and if you do not agree that the said article is the main article for the category, a discussion on the same can be started on the category's talk page. Thanks.-- Siddhartha Ghai ( talk) 18:22, 8 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Re:This is regarding the reversion of my redirecting the page List of universities in Rajasthan to List of educational institutions in Rajasthan. As you can see, the latter list already contains all the universities listed in the former. Also, you may see by looking at the category named above that the current convention is to have a single article for educational institutions in one state. Also, there has been talk on Talk:List of universities in India#List of universities in Tamil Nadu for the deletion of a similar article. Since the same arguments apply to List of universities in Rajasthan, I converted it to a redirect. If you still think that this content merits a separate list, please feel free to start a discussion about it on the article's talk page. Thanks.-- Siddhartha Ghai ( talk) 17:17, 13 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello Shyamsunder. I noticed you, or another editor created a Requests for Adminship page under your name, and I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that request, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC) Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The article History of Haryana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pretty much a duplicate of the history section at Haryana

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush ( talk) 00:29, 14 July 2011 (UTC) reply

I removed the prod, as I believe that there is a (currently unverified) likely notable topic under this. However, if reliable sources aren't added, it wouldn't surprise me to see this get sent to AfD, so, if you have any idea where to look and could add some sources to verify notability, it would be a great help. Qwyrxian ( talk) 01:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC) reply

If I may suggest, you may want to archive some threads on your talk page. Not all users have high speed connections, and at over 60,000 bytes, this page is becoming pretty heavy to load and a bit hard to navigate. For help on how to archive, see Help:Archiving a talk page. Of course, this is only a suggestion, and you are under no obligation to comply. Cheers - CharlieEchoTango ( talk) 09:12, 17 July 2011 (UTC) reply

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	You are truly tireless Garvit ( talk) 13:43, 17 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Category:Fairs of India, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply

naveenpf ( talk) 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply

	Thank you for your support
	Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. I shall endeavor to meet your and the community's expectations as an admin. Qwyrxian ( talk) 07:40, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi, I notice that your have moved pages back to this category. Category:Taxicabs of India fits in with the style of all other country-related taxicab articles and I see no reason why India should be different. Do you have any good reason to oppose this change? TerriersFan ( talk) 14:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Taxis in India are called taxis not taxicabs. Please discuss first on talk page before creating a rival category and emptying existing one. Thanks Shyamsunder ( talk) 19:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article L. A. Ramdas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. A. Ramdas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. mukerjee ( talk) 12:53, 5 August 2011 (UTC) reply

I may be wrong, but it seems the above-named hindi article was edited by you. Could you please correct the same, and add references? If you have problems typing in hindi, I'll translate it, but for that an IAST transcript of the same would be needed. Thanks.-- Siddhartha Ghai ( talk) 09:17, 17 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks anyway :)-- Siddhartha Ghai ( talk) 14:55, 17 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Why are you deleting the category "Military history of India" from articles of the 1947-48 Kashmir conflict? I'd appreciate to understand the rationale behind your action. AshLin ( talk) 14:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply

I have no issue as long as they are suitably grouped in an appropriate category. AshLin ( talk) 20:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply

First of all read WP:NHS. The fact is articles about schools rarely get deleted, even in AfD. And notability is certainly not the most important factor when it comes to deleting an article about a high school. An article about a school is acceptable if it has been mentioned in verifiable secondary sources. You might even want to see Jimbo Wales' opinion on the issue. Also see the following:

• http://www.hindu.com/2010/12/05/stories/2010120560790200.htm
• http://www.hindu.com/2007/05/26/stories/2007052610890400.htm
• http://www.hindu.com/2009/11/22/stories/2009112259190300.htm
• http://www.thehindu.com/life-and-style/kids/article57466.ece

All are from The Hindu which is a very reputable newspaper. That said, I'm not in for a heated discussion/edit war regarding this. I hope that you'd assume good faith and remove the PROD. Thank you! — Fιnεmαnn ^(talk) 19:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC) reply

It seems that you have edited Wikipedia since I posted this message. And you haven't removed the PROD which I asked you to do so, or haven't stated any reasons to keep it. I'm removing it. — Fιnεmαnn ^(talk) 01:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC) reply

I don't know what has caused you to start an edit war on the article. You first PRODded the article, which I removed because of WP:NHS. You then added two citation required tags on the article. The fact that this is the only school in Thrissur which has a ISO rating was clearly stated on the older website of the school. Still I removed the whole sentence which seemed promotional and not supported by their new website. And that the President of India inaugurated the school is well supported by the school website. I don't find that promotional and I have removed the citations required tag. I was just looking at your creations and it looks like half of them won't even survive an AfD!. Maybe you should focus on improving your own articles than wasting others time by your bogus tagging and deletion requests. — Fιnεmαnn ^(talk) 13:44, 31 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hemant Shesh. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Sudo Ghost 13:51, 6 September 2011 (UTC) reply

See propose to upmerge Category:Health problems in India to Category:Health in India Hugo999 ( talk) 05:41, 17 September 2011 (UTC) reply

As you seem familiar with the media in this country, could you tell us if this is a real newspaper or is just a blog? Have mörser, will travel ( talk) 09:54, 19 September 2011 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, Begum of Bhopal , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Ratibgreat ( talk) 11:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC) Ratibgreat ( talk) 11:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply

	The Original Barnstar
	Keep it up!!! Rocky ( talk) 15:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Category:Indian people in history, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker ( talk) 14:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Category:People in history, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker ( talk) 14:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC) reply

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Shyamsunder! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Political families of Pakistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political families of Pakistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crusoe8181 ( talk) 09:46, 27 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Need your help with L69 Group

 -Palak Mathur 11:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)  — Preceding 
unsigned comment added by 
Palakmathur (
talk • 
contribs)  

Category:People from Tiruchirapalli, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ravi _{My Tea Kadai} 05:14, 11 December 2011 (UTC) reply

User:Lihaas, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lihaas and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Lihaas during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 23:08, 6 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The following dictionaries call for a hyphen when "small-scale" is used as an adjective: Macmillan, American Heritage, Merriam-Webster, Compact Oxford, Webster's New World College, Cambridge. The proposed renaming would also bring this category into line with "Category:Large-scale structure of the cosmos". After familiarizing yourself with these, please go to WP:CFD and withdraw your objection. Chris the speller  ^yack 16:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Original Barnstar
	hey shyam, thanks for adding category to my article. this is my first article on wiki. any idea who will review my article so that the banner message goes away. Thanks, Rgds, amit Amitagni ( talk) 16:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Category:Abattoirs in India, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 01:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Just wana know - Why Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project is not Government-owned companies of India....? -- . Shlok _{talk .} 17:32, 29 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello Shyamsunder, Hello Sachinvenga, i have remove the catrgory, because the nuclear power plant is not a own company. The plant will be owned and operate by Nuclear Power Corporation of India. This is a Government-owned company, but not the plant itself. Best Regards ChNPP ( talk) 13:23, 2 March 2012 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nanki Ram Kanwar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanki Ram Kanwar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Noopur28 ( talk) 21:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Category:Highest points of Indian states, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. __ meco ( talk) 08:58, 10 March 2012 (UTC) reply

thanks for this I was looking for something like that, but could not find, perhaps i missed the word colossal. regards Ðℬig XЯaɣ 14:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tamil Nadu Board of Higher Secondary Education. Since you had some involvement with the Tamil Nadu Board of Higher Secondary Education redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Siddhartha Ghai ( talk) 00:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Category:Newspapers by language of India, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 16:32, 14 March 2012 (UTC) reply

I have changed the structure of the sub-cats for this in a way that avoids duplication with Category:Indian newspapers by language, and would welcome your comments. – Fayenatic London (talk) 12:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, I am trying to create an article for an Indian Organization, A2Z Group that is invested into Energy generation from renewable sources of energy like waste, biomass, etc. It's efforts have therefore helped our country a lot. Unfortunately since I am new to Wikipedia and since A2Z Group is an Indian company the wikipedia editors haven't been able to verify the 'notability' of the company.

Could you please help me with improving the Article and with convincing other editors/administrators about the notability of the Company? Thanks!

A2Z Group as the name suggests is a group of business units and therefore you will find a lot of references for each of its business units namely:-

• A2Z Maintenance & Engineering Services Ltd. :(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
• A2Z Infraservices Ltd.  :(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
• A2Z Infrastructure Ltd.  :(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
• A2Z Powercom Ltd.  :(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
• A2Z Powertech Ltd.  :(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
• A2Z Water Solutions Ltd.  :(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
• A2Z E-Waste Management Ltd.  :(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
• A2Z International Ltd.  :(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
• A2Z Admire  :(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
• A2Z Travel Solutions  :(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Willonthemove ( talk) 09:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks a lot for your barnstar :-)- Ravi _{My Tea Kadai} 13:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For creating Category:Observances_in_India. Just yesterday, I was thinking to create this category! Tito Dutta Message 01:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC) reply

I have added some articles in that category! -- Tito Dutta ^Message 01:50, 22 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Madras Mahajana Sabha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raj Bhavan ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Central List of Other Backward Classes in Rajasthan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central List of Other Backward Classes in Rajasthan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sitush ( talk) 19:04, 27 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you for all your contributions to wikipedia. Just an additional thought: Pls have a look at wiki page for Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and see if you can update it with any missing info, if possible. You may take a look at USA Patriot Act as a sample.Onkar 09:49, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

You objected to the deletion of Tamil Nadu Minerals Limited - unfortunately, it was a copyvio of their site (found out after I'd deleted it for being promotional). I've also deleted two more of User:Musukundan's articles for the reason of copyvio, and suspect more are there, as the writing of some of them is more like official sites than the usual Wikipedia article - and there are others deleted for copyvio or reduced to one line with about ten references. You undoubtedly know India better than I do - would you care to have a look at some of the other contributions of this user and see what you think? I've warned the user about repeated copyvio, and that it can lead to blocking. Peridon ( talk) 16:00, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank You for adding the links.( Blamecivil95 ( talk) 10:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC)) reply

I reverted your edit to MEMG, it is a Private Limited company, meaning that it is privately held and is not a public corporation. A reference is posted in my edit summary. Gsingh ( talk) 18:33, 8 May 2012 (UTC) reply

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy re Category:Devotional and spiritual television channels in India – Fayenatic London (talk) 12:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi, when I raised a full nomination along with another one, you asked me to split the nomination, and I have done so; please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 May 9#Category:Catholic Television Channels and the following section. – Fayenatic London (talk) 17:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Karpoor Chand Kulish, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — teb728 t c 17:11, 21 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The article Durga Lal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am not sure what criteria does the article meet or does not meet. But an article with a single sentence that too unsourced is definitely not worth keeping in Wikipedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Msrag ( talk) 06:01, 25 May 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Original Barnstar
	Keep it up !!! Alangar Manickam ( talk) 19:42, 29 May 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Original Barnstar
	Very good work! Keep it up! Thanks. Onkarr ( talk) 05:02, 5 June 2012 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2000 Mumbai landslide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000 Mumbai landslide until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 08:15, 8 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Dude, the AFD was not a personal attack on you. You have been here for more period compared to me. Thank you!

Finally, got another active Mumbai Wikipedian. :D -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 12:17, 8 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Doing this might be a better idea instead of removing category link from the comment, hence removing context. [1]. Cheers. -- lTopGunl ( talk) 10:57, 19 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Being an experienced editor and having a long presence on Wikipedia, I would like to ask you if you are willing to perform a GA review of article : A.P.J. Abdul Kalam. Please let me know your opinion. Thanks VIVEK RAI :  Friend?  11:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Sorry Vivek. I am not good at these things. Thanks for asking. Shyamsunder ( talk) 20:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply