NGC 1220, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic ( talk) 10:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:China on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, I believe closing discussions should be done by a more experienced user, or an administrator. I have reverted some of your closures, as they do not provide a clear reason for your closure, and may not follow how Wikipedia determines WP:CONSENSUS. Feel free to contribute to Wikipedia in other ways! Natg 19 ( talk) 16:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Ships&Space I have reverted your close since there's a request for close already open. This should be closed by an experienced editor who is uninvolved. Thanks! Nemov ( talk) 19:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Again, they are sufficiently experienced to close the RfC, and are uninvolved. Redacted II ( talk) 19:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

With all due respect, there's nothing in that close that supports your argument. The WP:CR was ignored, not updated, and the RFC tags weren't even removed. I'm not involved and it needs to be closed by someone who weighs the arguments. Thanks! Nemov ( talk) 19:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Look at the editing history: 95 edits as of now. To me at least, that is sufficient experience.

Also, they didn't ignore the WP:CR.They stated that they were closing the RfC, and then recommended going to DRN. Both of these were reverted by Natg 19. Redacted II ( talk) 19:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Respectfully, I do not consider 100 edits anywhere close to experienced enough. I would expect a closer to have several thousand. Additionally, non-admin closers must expect their closes to be scrutinized and should carefully explain why they have made the closure they did in the close itself in all but the most obvious cases, which this editor does not seem to have done.

Ships&Space: I appreciate your enthusiasm to help out with closing discussions, which is a difficult task that requires more people doing it. However, before one can have a good understanding of how to close discussions, one must participate in a large number of them and see how they are closed. I would encourage you to start there. — Compassionate727 ^{( T· C)} 13:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sulaiman Bek on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:NGC 1218. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 16:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC) reply

NGC 1218, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 16:18, 21 April 2024 (UTC) reply