Hi Pek! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham ( talk) 08:18, 12 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Hey. I'm actually not new. I just switched accounts. I used to have to login, then logout, whenever I jumped between Finnish Wikipedia and English Wikipedia, so I decided to just use my Finnish account on both sites. -- Pek ( talk) 08:32, 12 July 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Roof collapse, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

The topic appears unimportant, is possibly not worth the effort of fixing, and likely won't survive AFD. References are none, as the only reference is going to an obvious company that specializes in roof repairs. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:49, 12 July 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Ghost website, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Singularity42 ( talk) 19:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Currently those are the only sources I was able to find. Only others were with duplicate information, so I didn't include them. No point in transferring the article to draft space, when there is nothing else that can be done to the article. Just seems very silly. -- Pek ( talk) 19:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ghost website and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^{( talk)}/_{( contrib)} 03:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 03:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. Thank you for creating Egoyomi. User:LowLevel73, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice contribution to the encyclopedia. Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|LowLevel73}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

► 
LowLevel73 
(talk) 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trackside telephone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trackside telephone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 16:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Thematic tournament, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Pureed diet, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark • sniff) 15:41, 2 October 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Dye transfer inhibitor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 06:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asparagusus was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NOTHOWTO

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roof collapse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Asparagusus (interaction) 03:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC) reply

There MAY be a valid article here, but this isn't it - functionally unsourced, the two sources given are risible tabloid items, and the content on incels is simply misleading. Please don't put this into mainspace without substantial improvements. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 13:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intercourse denial and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Compusolus ( talk) 03:36, 13 November 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Pineapple boat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:36, 10 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ghost website, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Nanodegree, is not suitable as written to remain published. First, this is little more than a dictionary definition (see WP:DICDEF. Second, it would need more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Ghost website".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:11, 6 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thematic tournament, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 12:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pureed diet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 17:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dye transfer inhibitor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 07:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roof collapse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 04:01, 21 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Pureed diet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Dye transfer inhibitor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:03, 7 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Roof collapse".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Intercourse denial, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 13:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pineapple boat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 12:04, 12 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Intercourse denial".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Study partner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nanodegree, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The article Murder weapon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra ( talk) 14:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transmaxxing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transmaxxing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Writ Keeper  ⚇ ♔ 16:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC) reply

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.

Pek, looking at Transmaxxing and Height dysphoria (as well as the inactivity-deleted Draft:Intercourse_denial), I have a feeling you're trolling. Please note that the repeated creation of pages with verifiability, neutrality or notability issues may lead to a block from editing or a topic ban from the area described in the blue box above, possibly without further warning. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 16:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Seems like you haven't checked my profile page. And what exactly does contentious even mean? You mean controversial topics? Whats the issue with that? There are many controversial topics in Wikipedia. Also, how exactly is height dysphoria controversial? That's like the least controversial thing I'v ever written about. I'm really confused by your post. Please check people's profile pages and the articles they have created or edited, before commenting something as ridiculous as this, even calling me names. -- Pek ( talk) 16:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Also, Transmaxxing is up for deletion, if you don't find it notable enough, feel free to point your own opininion. Why make a personal attack against me? -- Pek ( talk) 16:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Pek, I would strongly recommend you slow down and learn a little more about Wikipedia's reliable sourcing requirements before creating more articles. Your recent creations are well below what is required for sourcing on Wikipedia, particularly when it comes to articles on medical topics (see the explanatory template I added below). I'd really recommend you try out WP:AfC for any future articles, or for articles that you continue to develop in draftspace, so you can get a second opinion on whether the article you've written is ready for the mainspace, since it seems you don't yet have a strong grasp of what that entails. GorillaWarfare (she/her •  talk) 17:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them.) WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here.

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note, or post to the talk page of the Wikipedia WikiProject Medicine GorillaWarfare (she/her •  talk) 16:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Fever dream (sleep physiology), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GorillaWarfare (she/her •  talk) 16:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Aim trainer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GorillaWarfare (she/her •  talk) 17:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username C1K98V, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Transmaxxer, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|C1K98V}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

C1K98V ^{( 💬 ✒️ 📂)} 03:53, 18 June 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Most effective tactics available is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most effective tactics available until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 23:35, 9 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Most effective tactics available, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 02:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply

How exactly is META an inappropriate article? Maybe better that you don't write ridiculous comments to other users pages, when you are high on mushroom juice. Just a useful tip. -- Pek ( talk) 08:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Though I think it's funny, please be aware that insinuating editors are "high" is an WP:ADHOMINEM insult. In any event, you did not do any sort of due diligence to check if there was an existing page for the term, which there is (meta is short for metagame, which has been there since 2005). The article is also misleading in that "meta" does not stand for "most effective tactics available" - it is a backronym. A simple Google search would see evidence of that. You must take more effort to check to see whether an article is standalone notable and can be properly sourced, and has the content to justify its existence, which seems to be an ongoing issue with other articles. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 11:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello Pek, while I understand that oneirology is a scientific field that studies dreams, my concern lies with the significance and notability of dream characters as a separate topic deserving their own page. I believe that the information about dream characters could be merged into the existing dreams page, or perhaps the lucid dreams page, as they might not have enough broader relevance to justify a standalone article. This would help maintain the integrity of the content while adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines. Please check WP:N and WP:STUB 2600:4040:A4B9:E000:CD4E:F439:6A11:EFF1 ( talk) 03:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Pek, would you consider voluntarily agreeing to stop creating new pages for a period of time (perhaps six months?) Looking back up through your talk page, there is a sea of deletion notices and requests from editors that you stop creating pages that are wholly inappropriate for Wikipedia, and yet the behavior seems to be continuing. It doesn't seem that you've yet been able to grasp what is appropriate for a standalone page, and what adequate sourcing looks like, so perhaps a voluntary break from creating new pages might be in order? There is certainly no shortage of existing pages that could use expansion and improvement, and it might help you get the hang of things to read more pages that are suitable for inclusion. GorillaWarfare (she/her •  talk) 16:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply

You can't be serious... 6 months? Are you out of your mind? I have exactly 2 activities that fulfill my life, first of them is playing video games and second one is reading/editing Wikipedia. There is no way I'm going on voluntary restriction. I have done many successful entries to Wikipedia, yet you ignore all of them. You are only focusing on my unsuccessful entries. About 50% of my articles has been allowed to exist, and you can check the list for yourself on my user page. There is no way in million years that I'm going to leave the activity that is so importantly part of my life and existence. Pek ( talk) 06:18, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply

I'm not asking you to stop reading or editing Wikipedia, I'm just asking if you would stop creating brand new pages. I have looked at some of the recent pages you've created that still remain, and they too have serious issues. Most effective tactics available is at AfD, trending towards delete. Several have WP:MEDRS issues ( electrophobia, for example), and others are likely not sufficiently notable/fleshed-out for a standalone article ( height dysphoria, tongue posture, etc.) GorillaWarfare (she/her •  talk) 16:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Pek repeatedly creating poor quality stubs. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (she/her •  talk) 16:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC) reply

• I have closed the ANI discussion with the note that you have voluntarily agreed to stop creating new articles for six months. For more details, visit here. Thank you for your understanding. Lourdes 11:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The article Height dysphoria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient WP:MEDRS for an arguably nonexistent condition. No evidence of WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IceBergYYC ( talk) 02:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Okichitaw (martial arts), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent editing history at Lebanon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash ( talk) 16:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Pek,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bastun and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Spice rack, for deletion, because [ consensus decision] previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun ^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Sorry, the article doesn't qualify for Speedy Deletion, so that has been withdrawn. It is very borderline whether or not it should be included in WP, though - please see WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Bastun ^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spice rack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spice rack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 ( talk) 05:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hey there, Pek. I've seen the new articles you've been making and I'm concerned that you have not addressed the problems that led to your 6 month voluntary restriction. During that time, you were asked to get more experience in editing, but I don't think you meaningfully did this. You made only 34 mainspace edits and then went right back to creating articles. Spice rack, Store credit (currency), Belly rub and Esports betting all have major problems. One is at AfD and the others should probably be draftified at a minimum.

Maybe I can help you to improve. One major problem with your articles is the sources. Dictionary defintiions, blogs and promotional sources are not particularly helpful, especially when it comes to establishing notability. Indeed, many of the blogs you cite should not be used as Wikipedia sourcing at all.

For example, this source used on your store credit article is essentially an ad. It's there to sell the website's "easy solution to managing (store credit)" as you can see from the call to action at the end. I'm using this as an example but you use many similar sources.

I urge you to get more general editing experience and learn more about appropriate sources before continuing article creation. Consider adding sections to existing articles rather than creating whole new ones. The best sources for the articles you create will likely be found in newspapers and magazines. Consider using articles like this or this for your Esports betting page and steer well clear of blogs.

Feel free to ask for advice if I can help. MarchOfThe Greyhounds 09:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fever dream (sleep). Thanks! Drmies ( talk) 01:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply