Archives

Archive 1: March 2022–April 2023

Hi, I believe you denied my draft biography entry for game designer Arnold Hendrick. I get that I do not have enough reliable sources. I know they're out there but I am working full time still and I don't have time to find them. Is there a way I can ask others for help with this? Thank you. Nricketts ( talk) 19:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello Nricketts! I think that your draft has improved a lot since I reviewed it. However, the sections "Early life" and "Tabletop games" need inline citations. Even if the sources you have do support it, you need to link them after the correct sentences. You could ask people for help at the Teahouse, where I am a host. You could also add the template {{ Template:draft}}. Hope this helps! Asparagusus (interaction) 13:18, 25 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you so much for your help. If I get time I may try to add citations. But trying to do anything in here seems more and more complex every time I try. Drafts, Sandbox, user pages--there's just too much. I don't see how anyone has the time to mess with it. Anyway I do appreciate your help. Nricketts ( talk) 16:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello Asparagusus,

I'm not a vandalist. I corrected the playlist of the album of the Rolling Stones "Goats Head Soup" Deluxe edition. "Heartbreaker" and "Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo (Heartbreaker)" are the same song, so it's not necessary to write two different ways. I just corrected that. Please, don't change my correction. The first time I corrected, I forgot to log in. I'm french and I use to correct french articles.

Greetings. Pigaillem ( talk) 15:51, 27 September 2023 (UTC) reply

I'm so sorry about that. I misinterpreted your edit as vandalism. I should've researched more about the topic before I reverted it. Happy editing! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 18:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC) reply

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Asparagusus for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2023 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki ( talk) 09:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello,

I am writing you because I cannot understand why you (among others) have removed my contributions on Not Just Bikes. The stated reason is that it goes against Wikipedia's policy of NPOV, but, my contributions actually strengthen the NPOV principle. The article was lacking any sort of mention of the critics of NJB, and I decided to give them their righteous space in a NPOV encyclopedia. I felt the need to put the whole quote in the article without omission, as that would be tempering with the quote's original message and I am not qualified to omit certain paragraphs for that reason. I am for a NPOV and against censorship so I ask you again: why did my contributions get deleted?

Note that I also warned against starting a so-called "edit war", there was no response to this. Rather than removing my contribution, might I suggest we have a civil debate in the talk page of Not Just Bikes?

Greetings CommissieVervoersMigratie ( talk) 21:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello CommissieVervoersMigratie. I'm just going to respond here as this is where you posted. First, I recommend you read the policy on edit wars rather than warn me against starting one, when you could've started the discussion initially after your first revert. No critics have a "righteous space in an NPOV encyclopedia". As Skdb said, any reception section should also have positive/other reception, lest the critique have undue weight. The quote you grabbed was actually a criticism section from another article that was a collection of non-attributed quotes. It was also 2.5 times the size of the article before you added it, which raises a lot of concern about a copyright violation. Saying "Not all people are a fan of NJB" is unencyclopedic. A criticism section should have multiple examples to be due weight. I was not censoring the quote. If you really think that the reader needs the whole three-paragraph, 250-word, multi-unattributed-quote section, maybe just put that in the external links? I mean, first you'd have to make sure the link worked. You have not stated the country that the Commission on Mobility Migration is from, the person who wrote that text, the people who were quoted in that text, and whether the text is translated, which it looks to be based on the prose. Have a good day! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 21:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC) reply

is this better? love your feedback

Heart of Glass Blondie Tribute Band Heart of Glass is a tribute band dedicated to emulating the music and performance style of the notable rock band Blondie. The group's performances focus on reproducing the authentic experience of Blondie's live shows. Band Members: Jennifer Queen - Vocals Jennifer Queen has previously been associated with bands such as Thallium, Josie & The Copycats, and Vicious Mistress. She's collaborated with a Chicago-based music management company and is recognized for her strong vocal range and stage presence. Lorrie Kountz - Lead Guitar and Vocals Lorrie Kountz is a skilled guitarist and pianist. She has toured North America and shared stages with established bands like U2, Scorpions, and Ramones. With multiple internationally distributed CDs and vinyl releases to her credit, Lorrie has been involved in various music genres and projects. She has received mention in media outlets such as the Chicago Tribune and Guitar Player Magazine. Recently, Lorrie collaborated with Paul Barker on his project, Lead Into Gold. Laura Jansons - Guitar and Synth A former member of the band Whatismu, Laura Jansons is a multimedia artist and composer. With a history of working alongside Lorrie Kountz in past musical endeavors, Laura plays a dual role in Heart of Glass, handling both the guitar and synth duties. Jeff Fite - Drums Beginning his drumming journey at the age of 7, Jeff Fite has studied percussion extensively, encompassing genres like Jazz, Latin, and Rock. Jeff's rich musical history has seen him involved with several bands and musical projects in and around Chicago. Pete Jansons - Bass Guitar In addition to his role as a bass guitarist for Heart of Glass, Pete Jansons has a presence in the podcasting scene, covering a variety of topics. His musical experience extends to performances with the band Chick Norris. Pete also possesses entrepreneurial experience, having established several businesses. Heart of Glass Blondie Tribute Band ( talk) 13:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello Heart of Glass Blondie Tribute Band. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not your web hosting service or blog. It is not the place to advertise your band. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 14:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:45, 24 October 2023 (UTC) reply

HJ Mitchell Thanks! :) —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 13:07, 25 October 2023 (UTC) reply

There Is No Need For A Source? I Expand Through The French Translation And There Isnt A Source I Can Put Could You Please Put It Back. Thanks. TBATlol ( talk) 23:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello Asparagusus:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2400 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC) reply

I have RevDel'ed it. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks, Daniel Case! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 13:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

I added her youtube as an external link. Just like her a link is there to her web page.

I also added in that she is currently documenting her journey on her youtube. something I though would be of interest to someone trying to understand what is going on with her.. and the source of her documentation.. is her youtube. I am not Jeanne.. but have met her and think that the more information about a humble person would be good.

Can you identify the problem with giving more external links to a topic of interest?

Thank you in advance.. 82.41.88.77 ( talk) 13:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello IP! Sorry about the wait; I was with family over the past week. The way that you presented the information in the article seemed a little bit like an advertisement. Also, the only source was her YouTube channel, which doesn't show that the information is a notable fact about her. I think that you should just put the link in the external links section. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 14:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC) reply

it was in links.. and saying she is going round the world based on self published blog.. is fine... I just don't get what the deal is.. 82.41.88.77 ( talk) 15:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Please see WP:EXTERNALLINKS. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 15:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi Asparagusus I don't know who you are and you don't know who I am but I've been trying to find someone who review my drafts it's been 10 days since I last submitted them again for review and no reviewer has reviewed them since than. I saw your names on the active reviewers list and I thought I'd give you my drafts for you to see and review if they are worthy to be included in Wikipedia as articles. Please respond once you have made a decision to review them or not. Thank you and have a great day!. [ [1]], [ [2]], [ [3]]. 2600:1700:2F01:CDC0:DDF1:72AB:7BC7:E9F8 ( talk) 15:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello IP user! I am not at my computer right now, but I might have time to look at these drafts tomorrow. Luckily, the review queue is only about a week behind, so another reviewer might get to it before I do. Have a great day! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 15:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC) reply

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 27 reviews, for a total of 27.5 points. – robertsky ( talk) 06:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC) reply

– robertsky ( talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

– robertsky ( talk) 06:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Robertsky, thank you so much! Happy holidays :). —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 21:01, 25 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi asparagus can you review my articles and see if they are worthy to be included in Wikipedia. These articles meet all general notability requirements for inclusion in Wikipedia and that they are separate languages with their Iso codes and reference codes and names. Here they are. They are also not redirects as Anomie bot and Rober Mclennon only added redirects based on similar names but they are totally different language articles that i have created with information verified and reliable. Here they are.[ [4]], [ [5]], [ [6]], [ [7]], [ [8]], [ [9]], [ [10]] 2600:1700:2F01:CDC0:CDB:CEB6:91A7:23BB ( talk) 13:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Also [ [11]], [ [12]] 2600:1700:2F01:CDC0:CDB:CEB6:91A7:23BB ( talk) 13:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi Asparagusus. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! —Femke 🐦 ( talk) 09:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Femke, thanks! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 12:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I've started a discussion at WT:Air to attempt to agree a consensus on this issue here. As you contributed to the discussion at the Teahouse ( here) - I've invited you to the discussion. Nigel Ish ( talk) 13:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Asparagusus,

Why did you not accept my page on Anvay Saxena? Urps5 ( talk) 23:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello @ Urps5. I rejected the draft because it contained sensitive personal information. Please be safe with what information you put out about yourself online. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 01:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Asparagusus,

Thanks. Urps5 ( talk) 02:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I don't think "wincest" is merely a Supernatural thing. It's old 4chan slang (it specifically arose out of the anime fanbase for the "incest-teasing/imouto" genre of romantic anime, which culminated with Oreimo - that was far more over the internet than Supernatural was at the time, specifically around late 2010-11), and I think the old redirect should be restored. 87.116.164.218 ( talk) 21:46, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I’m fairly sure Wincest is a portmanteau based on the main characters of Supernaturals’ surname. Please provide a reliable source. However, I should not have called your edit vandalism as I can see where you’re coming from. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 22:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I was going to copyedit this article but noticed that you worked on it March 2 (but not since), and it's on your section of the GOCE drive page. Are you going to continue? It helps to remove the {{ copy edit}} tag before starting a copyedit so we don't bump into each other; there's plenty of work to go around . All the best, Mini apolis 20:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi @ Miniapolis! Sorry about that! I meant to take the tag off but forgot. I will continue, but I’m on vacation right now. I guess I should’ve put a banner. Thanks! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 22:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for letting me know, and enjoy your vacation! I didn't want to yank the article out from under you. All the best, Mini apolis 01:01, 12 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

• Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
• Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
• Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
• Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
• Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
• Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
• Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
• Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
• Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
• Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
• Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
• Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
• Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
• Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
• Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
• Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
• Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron ( talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 10:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Here's the link: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Please ban Fabrickator from interacting with me.

Thanks for your suggestion regarding an interaction ban, which is something I didn't know about. And thanks again for the stroopwafels. I noticed some on sale in an Amazon Coffee Cafe in real life and because of you kind post, bought them and later ate them. They were tasty. Polar Apposite ( talk) 21:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Polar Apposite Thanks for the notification! I’ll check it out today or tomorrow. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 20:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Asparagusus, I found that there are two IP address ranges 2001:1388:A44:0:0:0:0:0 and 2001:1388:A45:0:0:0:0:0 All edits from the IP address found to be the same person. Harassing and deleting content in other articles which had administrators warn and rollback more than 20 disruptive edits Found the latest edit, redo it. 2001:1388:A44:EDDB:98F3:C8BE:82C6:175D /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/2001:1388:A44:EDDB:98F3:C8BE:82C6:175D Repeatedly adding unsourced content and deleting maintenance tags by correcting them and not explained in the article Nine (singer) in terms of being a fan club Due to adding content to live broadcast activities to sell products Duplicate content is added which is not important. As with most of the content in this article

You can help check and revert the last edit of 2001:1388:A44:EDDB:98F3:C8BE:82C6:175D Is this possible? /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/2001:1388:A44:EDDB:98F3:C8BE:82C6:175D This person from Peru is using the same IP address range to harass many other articles, using the same IP address range, but the address Unique IP to avoid blocking

This person is constantly adding a lot of unsourced content. Deleting maintenance tags without correcting them Repeatedly adding unsourced content to Nine (singer)'s articles after being warned and the administrators reverting the edits. He has been doing the same behavior for a long time. The latest modification behavior I consider serious because it has been doing it for a long time is being warned with different IP addresses. Therefore, no one can block his actions. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Nine_(singer)&action=history

Edit history Nine (singer) has only one person, IP addresses starting with 2001:1388:A45 and 2001:1388:A44 all are the same person The edits will be made in the same way, namely adding information to the article without the source in Nine (singer) and deleting and disturbing other articles. which always has admin rollback This person made repeated changes with new IP addresses like this.

The entire article was edited by the same person, unexplained removal of maintenance tags, and recently used a new IP address to add a lot of unsourced content.

Administrators address disruptive IP address user behavior issues. Continuously adding unsourced content to Nine (singer) A single person from Lima, Peru, used the IP address to reverse an update notification. Unexplained deletion of maintenance tags Modifications were not performed according to the maintenance tag instructions. Please disturb other articles as well. /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/2001:1388:A45:7B00:358F:FBE6:A148:46A0

repeated addition of unsourced content I think examining a person is difficult. This person from Lima, Peru uses a different IP address every time they resolve. Every time delete and add information to another article. will be reversed Then edit again with the new IP address.

This person created information in the Nine (singer) article and also caused mischief in other articles. Add information without references Administrators always roll back edits that this person deleted on other articles. Editing that disturbs another article and edited and added information only to the article Nine (singer) The person using all IP addresses in this Nine (singer) article is the same person who removed the maintenance tag without editing it.

The person using all the IP addresses I attached is the same person. I'm only giving examples because there are many. The entire article Nine (singer) has an IP address from the same person from Lima, Peru, but the IP address in the update is different every time the information is added. This person deleted the maintenance tag notice. Delete without correcting Most articles lack references. As I looked at the article's history, Nine (singer) has been doing this for a long time, but no user has come to check on this person.

Edit history of this article There is an IP address from Peru adding a lot of content. and repeat it many times continuously. without reference source The IP address in every edit is different. But I and another user checked and it was all the same person.

/info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/2001:1388:A45:7B00:F810:2A14:7BCB:F48B

/info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/2001:1388:A44:40B6:504C:F2CB:D823:F9B

/info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/2001:1388:A45:AEDB:F872:834B:5232:4D3E

/info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/2001:1388:A44:EA0C:2594:EA67:F737:FD4B

/info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/2001:1388:A45:F15F:C574:7A91:49D9:AAC9

/info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/2001:1388:A44:23CC:DCF2:FD41:F2BA:FCE3 MeetHoneyBee ( talk) 18:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

• Kbdank71
• Kosack
• NrDg
• TLSuda

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.

Technical news

• The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. ( T313405)

Arbitration

• An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".

Miscellaneous

• Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.

Hi Asparagusus :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 12:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	For signing my guestbook. Thanks :) thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You did this on here (specifically this diff [13]). Please don't. Users are actually able to remove their own talk page messages, since you can always look in history ( [14] in this case).

Thank you and have a nice day! Me Da Wikipedian ( talk) 10:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello @ Me Da Wikipedian! I am aware of the policy, but forgot about it at the moment. Thank you for reminding me. Have a good day! :) —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 13:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your welcome. Thank you. Me Da Wikipedian ( talk) 13:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for posting the Getting Started on my talkpage. I hope you have a wonderful day! Pumpkinless Spice ( talk) 17:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Pumpkinless Spice, you're welcome! You, too! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 18:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply