Hello, Nivamp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Major Fortune, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:01, 26 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Nivamp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " Major Fortune".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:35, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect Red, Blue, and Yellow has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 10 § Red, Blue, and Yellow until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect Red, Blue and Yellow has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 10 § Red, Blue and Yellow until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect Red Blue and Yellow has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 10 § Red Blue and Yellow until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect The Barrister has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 9 § The Barrister until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 05:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect Not to be confused has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10 § Not to be confused until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 08:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Viktoria Milvidskaia Belinsky

added a link pointing to Belinsky

Vissarion Belinsky

added a link pointing to Belinsky

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Lázaro Garza Ayala, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ayala and Garza.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect Les escargots has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 8 § Les escargots until a consensus is reached. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 17:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

It is the native French name of René Laloux's short film The Snails. It should therefore redirect to The Snails' article but since The Snails doesn't have its article, it redirects to Laloux's. Nivamp ( talk) 17:28, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect C) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 14 § C) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 16:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect O) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 14 § O) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 16:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi there. I have reverted a couple of your edits because you added hatnote entries that are related to the topic at hand and are really sub-articles/topics of the main article. Hatnotes are for unrelated articles and related articles should be linked inside the article instead of the hatnote per WP:RELATED. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 19:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Please see WP:NOTBROKEN and avoid making WP:COSMETIC edits. TylerBurden ( talk) 19:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC) reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Norse mythology. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TylerBurden ( talk) 19:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt ( talk) 19:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply