Thanks, Mikalra, for your attentiveness to the Epistle to the Ephesians authorship issue, and for taking the time to research the matter. I agree with your assessment and have included your research in the article. Best to you in your studies! Afaprof01 ( talk) 04:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Cheers (leave room in your calorie budget for this) Taurus ( talk) 18:09, 14 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fallujah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anbar ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply

It's not clear whether the original source refers to Anbar province or the town of Anbar, so I'm not in a position to disambiguate. Mikalra ( talk) 02:56, 13 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Please come and talk on the Talk page - please don't try edit war your changes in. thanks! Jytdog ( talk) 17:46, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Done.

-- Mikalra ( talk) 19:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply

I thought I should involve you in the dialogue. makeswell ( talk) 21:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Gerontology page, your edit caused a DOI error ( help) and an ISBN error ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:19, 25 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Western pattern diet page, your edit caused a cite error ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello. A tag has been placed on Adam Lowry (entrepreneur) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix ( talk) 00:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Mikalra. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Washington Journal (website) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix ( talk) 18:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Alexbrn ( talk) 20:37, 25 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohawk people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algonquian language ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Can you please provide the name of the arranger and/or performer? This would certainly make the entry more notable since this information is provided for all other entries in the "Other versions" section.

All of the other versions listed can be heard on YouTube or by downloading an mp3 but it appears that one must own the video game to actually hear this so-called other version!

Why not just put video games in the "In popular culture" section and leave it at that?

JaneOlds ( talk) 23:10, 6 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi: I'm afraid I don't know the the name of the arranger and/or performer: much video game work was uncredited in the early days. It's also listed as 'unknown' on the Video Game Music Preservation Foundation wiki page. This version can also be heard on YouTube — e.g. Spy Hunter (Arcade) Music. I don't strongly object to it being in the pop culture section instead, but I also don't see any positive reason for such a move, and if you look on the Talk page, there's already long-standing agreement amongst editors that it's appropriate here. If we're going to discuss this further, I'd suggest we carry it out there. Mikalra ( talk) 23:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi Mikalra,
I question your edit of 19:52, 11 August 2016 here. It makes it sound like there are many "Australian immigration detention facilities, located on Los Negros Island".
I believe that the Manus Regional Processing Centre is the only one, on that Island?
Regards, 220 of ^Borg 03:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Yes, I see your point: that was a syntactical SNAFU. I had meant to indicate that it was one of many such centers, not that it was one of many such centers located on that specific island. Fixed.
Mikalra ( talk) 03:23, 21 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Though it was a "snafu", but I had 'fixed' it here (some IP editor added the "only 2" crap after your edit, here).
Doesn't madda! 220 of ^Borg 03:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Agreed, you had fixed the error you are pointing out here. My new edit restores the point that it's one of many such centers while avoiding the original problematic phrasing and without making any given sentence too convoluted.
Mikalra ( talk) 14:15, 21 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, Mikalra. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Concerning this edit, there is no point in discussing such preliminary lab research in the article. The previous sentence about no effect in humans is all that's needed. Such statements need the support of WP:MEDRS sources. You may wish to review this MEDRS tutorial. -- Zefr ( talk) 19:45, 10 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Please reconsider. I would agree with you about preliminary lab research, except that the widespread public interest in the public and sales of the dietary supplement are based exactly on that 2006 report: the lack of replication in normal animals is in this case surely important. The lack of evidence on human lifespan can rightly be said to be argumentum ex silentio. And these are proper scientific secondary sources. Mikalra ( talk) 20:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC) reply

I know this literature and consumer interest, and understand your point. There are many similar examples on WP of misinformation wrongly guiding consumer commitment. In all cases that I monitor, the article states the absence of human evidence as adequate. Might be worth your while posting a request for opinion at WT:MED. -- Zefr ( talk) 20:18, 10 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Done]; your participation welcome. Mikalra ( talk) 22:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC) reply

While not disputing your edits, they do *NOT* constitute a "minor edit"!!! Vincent J. Lipsio ( talk) 02:39, 27 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Your addition to Software testing has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The text you uses to "clarify" smoke testing was taken from http://www.softwaretestingstudio.com/smoke-sanity-retest-regression-testing/ Walter Görlitz ( talk) 21:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi: this is not correct, at least as stated: I imported this material from the existing Smoke testing (software) article, which FWIW does not cite that source.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to White Helmets (Syrian Civil War), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. I removed content that you added to White Helmets (Syrian Civil War) because it draws original conclusions not stated in the cited source. Bennv3771 ( talk) 03:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply

I think it's pretty clearl that everything I wrote is drawn from the cited article, but it's not worth an edit war or protracted debate. Mikalra ( talk) 14:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Some of the content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/scheer-isis-jihadi-jack-1.4868495. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. I paraphrased the material. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 21:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Mikalra. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blossom, Bubbles, and Buttercup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heat vision ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 15 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Your edit to Kim Campbell triggered a copyright violation notice. see here.-- Moxy 🍁 22:06, 26 June 2019 (UTC) reply

I can honestly say that I never even looked at any of those sources, except this and this, which I cited extensively and used quotes where I was quoting. Please restore, or suggest/enact reasonable edits to preserve content while avoiding any legitimate copyright concern. Mikalra ( talk) 22:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC) reply

I am confused here....your adding sources that you have never seen but it's an exact copy? MOS:QUOTES-- Moxy 🍁 22:24, 26 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Let me clarify. The copyright bot you linked claims possible infringement of multiple sources. I had never seen most of these sources (many of which it doesn't seem to be saying are exact copies anyway, and has low confidence in); I had consulted two of them, which as I said I cite extensively and use direct quotes where appropriate in order to avoid any copyright problems.

What's especially odd is that the bot claims 96% confidence of infringement of this, which I not only never consulted, but has nothing on it about either Milgaard or the SNC-Lavalin affair, which is the subject of all the original content I added! Mikalra ( talk) 23:03, 26 June 2019 (UTC) reply

User:Moxy, I hope you haven't disengaged with this and will seriously review the alleged infringements. I sincerely believe my edits were entirely proper. It appears to me that the system may have caught some pre-existing issues in the article, not my edits. Mikalra ( talk) 22:29, 29 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Last Spike (Canadian Pacific Railway), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rogers Pass ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:40, 15 July 2019 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blue dress. Since you had some involvement with the Blue dress redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 13:35, 6 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 00:07, 16 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi, I did some editing on your recent addition to Oswald Avery, but it seems to me that the section "Debate over the pathogen in the 1918 influenza epidemic" ends somewhat abruptly and isn't quite finished. Did you want to add some more material? Cheers, AxelBoldt ( talk) 01:21, 13 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi: thanks for your valuable edit — and yes, it DOES kind of run out of steam: I couldn't find a clear enough explanation of how the whole thing actually shook out as it regards Oswald, so I put what my source indicated (clarified by a couple of external refs) and dropped it. Hopefully someone with better sources can pick it up from there. Mikalra ( talk) 00:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi, just wanted to follow up on our recent disagreement at John Sepulvado re: whether XRAY.FM is a LPFM station. I'm not at all a radio expert, so I'm happy to drop it, but I wanted to let you know why I thought it was not. I can consistently pick up its signal all over Portland and well beyond, which is unlike most LPFM stations I've listened to. So I had asked the executive director of XRAY, who I know. He said: "XRAY is not an LPFM. (Actually never was. A small station, 🐭 but not an LPFM.)" My conclusion was that it was LPFM prior to the transfer from Reed College (and that station was almost impossible to pick up!) but that the more recent, bigger transmitters had taken it out of the realm of LPFM. You're right that there are sources that refer to it that way, and it's a small detail anyway...but I wanted to share my thinking, and if you have any further thoughts I'm curious. - Pete Forsyth ( talk) 07:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science

added a link pointing to H index

Senolytic

added a link pointing to Nucleus

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page H index.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Briggs Initiative into Ronald Reagan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{ copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 22:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Thanks for clarifying this. I was vaguely aware that this was the policy, but had no idea how to actually comply; I will do so henceforth and also try to think of previous instances to credit retroactively.

Q: How should one credit similar more or less direct use of Wikipedia content in other, non-Wikimedia Wikis, where a Wiki link would not lead to Wikipedia? Just an edit note saying "ode>copied content from the Wikipedia page [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution"?

Thanks, Mikalra ( talk) 02:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CureVac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tweet.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I believe this group is notable, however current sources do not establish this by significant coverage in independent 3rd party sources focusing on the subject as opposed to the subjects relationship to other notable subjects.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle ( talk) 18:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Mikalra! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nightenbelle ( talk) 18:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barton Gellman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World Trade Center.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello - I made this revert a) because it's not unexpected to have a candidate vaccine fail in a Phase II trial using cancer patients (most do), and b) it wasn't a research collaboration - the title of the subsection - so was in the wrong place, if warranted at all. Not everything a biotech company achieves or fails to accomplish is notable, WP:WEIGHT. Zefr ( talk) 20:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hm. So if I created a new section and included this information, would you leave it to stand? You're right of course that most drugs fail early in clinical trials, but they and other companies including Moderna are trying similar approaches for cancer, and precedents matter. Mikalra ( talk) 22:31, 25 March 2022 (UTC) reply

It's an unsuccessful clinical trial, which is common in biotech drug or vaccine development, and not worthy of coverage in an encyclopedia. Zefr ( talk) 23:08, 25 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Mikalra. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 13:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Mikalra. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Union of Health Care Professionals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Halo Top Creamery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Reed.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 4 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Fat fingers reverted.. sorry.-- ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 18:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Republican Accountability Project, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lame duck.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi, Mikalra. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, including numerous improvements to Abortion in California. One of your edits there happened to change the lead sentence in a way that ended up triggering an edit war at the article by other editors. (Just to be clear: you were not involved in any edit-warring at the article; not even 1RR.) I've just removed the portion of that edit that affected the lead sentence, and left the rest of it intact. There's a discussion on the Talk page about the edit warring that resulted, and you're welcome to take part in it, if you wish. Thanks again for your improvements to Wikipedia. Cheers, Mathglot ( talk) 21:22, 25 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Mikalra. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " Union of Health Care Professionals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerry Coyne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Secular Jew.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

Please remove the external links from the body. Best regards, -- Johannes ( Talk) ( Contribs) ( Articles) 10:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grid (website) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes ( Talk) ( Contribs) ( Articles) 10:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The best source is the article by Politico but that is not enough to meet notability. The other sources are what they say about themselves (press releases, interviews, their statements, etc.) which are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability and should only be used sparingly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grid (website) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 ( talk) 16:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Mikalra. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Union of Health Care Professionals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:53, 12 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

The source you linked to is an opinion piece, clearly labeled a such. First Africans in Virginia is where you need to start, and you need to gain consensus concerning the status of the Africans there first, rather than going to a peripheral article on that subject. I read the reference you provided, and it will need to be supported by a scholarly reference, which should be available if the assertion is correct. Acroterion (talk) 03:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I will not revert again, but you need to address my concern, not just revert with the same edit summary. Acroterion (talk) 03:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply