Welcome!
Hello, Lucasoutloud, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Irritable bowel syndrome. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Literaturegeek |
T@1k? 17:46, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
...for the barnstar! WilliamH ( talk) 17:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
for the barnstar! EricWesBrown ( Talk) 00:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Read WP:TRIVIA. Lists of "this work mentioned the rabbit test" add nothing to the article and only clutter it up with trivia. The list mentioned that there was a New York Times crossword puzzle that mentioned it. HOW is that relevant? I say not at all, and WP:TRIVIA agrees. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:20, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
I added information. Accurate information, I should note. We even have a whole Wikipedia page on the series in question that anyone could have gone and looked at to get references. Instead I got blindly reverted by lazy editors uninterested in doing work to improve the encyclopedia when the Undo button is faster. So, yeah, that pissed me off.
But not nearly as much being accused of vandalism when I actually added the reference. Jesus. I hope your fundraising drive fails if you treat people this way. 96.39.62.90 ( talk) 03:39, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Oh, and I have never been able to get the ref tags to work and am uninterested in learning a bunch of markup language. But way to remove accurate and cited information because you, who presumably know how to, are unwilling to fix it. That was really classy *golf clap*. 96.39.62.90 ( talk) 03:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
No, you have it wrong
I didn't revert it because I didn't like the way you did your ref tags, it was because it seemed like you were deliberately adding false information. Why would a Doctor Who book have information like that, anyway? I'll let the page get looked over by someone who is more knowledgeable about the subject. Lucasoutloud ( talk) 03:54, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Because the book talks about Doctor Who in the context of other television of the time? I mean, really, where do you get off accusing me of lying about a citation? Jesus. 96.39.62.90 ( talk) 04:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- It's already been taken care of, so don't get your panties in a wad. Lucasoutloud ( talk) 04:27, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Rogers Heritage High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public school ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:45, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello-
I am increasingly frustrated here. Anytime I try to present a view that does not fit into leftist ideology, I am censored. People are obfuscating me with vague and loosely interpreted talk about reliable sources. These things are a matter of opinion. I sould be allowed to present an alternate view, I have made solid contributions in music and boxing, but I am not allowed to modify leftist opinions, even in a reasonable fashion, hence the vandalism. I am sick of this. Why can I not present the other side, even with evidence ? Youtube is not a reliable source, granted, but when I present a video of the subject of the article speaking, that is different.
- Well, that was blatant vandalism and opinion isn't really a thing that is appropriate on Wikipedia. That, and you blanked out a ton of content. You didn't even provide any citations or sources; it was just an outright attack on Muslims. Lucasoutloud ( talk) 19:01, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Actually, that was after 3 or 4 attempts at a civilised edit, and adding a section. The first couple of edits I did were very reasonable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamanexpertjah ( talk • contribs) 19:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well, what I did to your revision was reasonable. Why would you resort to vandalism in lieu of talking to the ones who reverted your edits? Lucasoutloud ( talk) 19:32, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative
Hi Lucasoutloud,
You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.
Thank you.
Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a
vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. NOT AN ACTUAL WARNING. JUST TESTING TWINKLE.
AndrewN
talk 21:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
May 27 2012
Hi! I'm new to wiki editing. I've changed the wording on White House Grammar School to make it sound like a wikientry. Please remove reference to deletion as any school is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hussaintaha ( talk • contribs) 04:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your work on New Page Patrol. Please note that page patrolling and nominating articles for deletion require considerable experience. Please be sure to read WP:NPP thoroughly and also familiarise yourself with any special conditions that apply to schools - do follow up on the closures of your AfD nominations. If you are in doubt, don't hesitate to ask me for advice. Thanks, and happy patrolling! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 02:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
As you had participated in the previous AfD, your views would be welcome here Talk:Use_of_Twitter_by_celebrities_and_politicians#Proposal_to_merge. §§ AnimeshKulkarni ( talk) 16:28, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Sup rawr -vemacs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.190.185.144 ( talk) 14:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
ur a faget — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.162.204.184 ( talk) 22:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC) Stay mad, anon. Lucasoutloud ( talk) 22:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
meaniepants-- 190.50.165.90 ( talk) 22:29, 31 July 2012 (UTC) You know, wouldn't it be a better idea to troll the bioware forums or something? Just saying, anon. Lucasoutloud ( talk) 22:30, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
| Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
|---|---|
 |
Yours, Maximilianklein ( talk) 04:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Lucasoutloud. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Sdfjjelwjelk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=logo}
|
US Banknote Contest |
|
|---|---|---|
| November-December 2019 | ||
|
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here | ||
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk)