A lemonade for you!
	I enjoyed reading your new article at When life gives you lemons, make lemonade! You may want to consider submitting it to Did You Know; I think it would be great for the main page. VQuakr ( talk) 05:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC) reply

On 25 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article When life gives you lemons, make lemonade, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the proverbial phrase " when life gives you lemons, make lemonade" was first coined by Christian anarchist writer Elbert Hubbard in 1915? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 16:04, 25 September 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Original Barnstar
	The When life gives you lemons, make lemonade DYK nomination is by far one of the best I've seen! Great job on the article. ComputerJA ( talk) 17:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Wow, thank you so much for your compliment! Lenschulwitz ( talk) 18:55, 25 September 2012 (UTC) reply

For film/music etc reviews we only note the responses of professional critics, not the great unwashed unscientific and easily skewed non professional reviews. see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines#Critical_response -- The Red Pen of Doom 17:00, 3 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Please do not add external links to your website. This is inherently biased and promotional. Here are the boilerplate warnings for external links and COI:

EL

Hello, I'm EncMstr. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.

COI

Hello, Lenschulwitz. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Thanks, — EncMstr ( talk) 23:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC) reply

7&6=thirteen ( ☎) has given you a Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

And thanks for making Wikipedia a better encyclopaedia. If you don't believe that, then The Moon is made of green cheese. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 22:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Informally, you should be aware that the WP:ARBCC decision places particular emphasis on care needed when editing in this topic area. In particular, WP:ARBCC#Use of blogs and self-published sources is restricted to very limited circumstances, typically articles about the blog or source itself.. . . 20:55, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

There's no indication at Tethering that PAM is used as an abbreviation for "Phone-as-Modem", so that entry has no place in the dab page - see WP:MOSDAB. Thanks. Pam D 23:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Changed Tethering to reflect PAM and undid edit, thanks! Lenschulwitz ( talk) 00:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC) reply

When you rename or move pages, as you recently did Religious Society of Friends Meetinghouse, please remember to also fix links that are supposed to point to the new name. What links here is your friend. Thanks for your help. Magic ♪piano 22:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the tip! Lenschulwitz ( talk) 22:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello Lenschulwitz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Civic Farms for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis ( talk) 14:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_dmoG0udHBinTnNP&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs ( talk) 16:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Distributed hash table, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Address ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC) reply

The article Reba Place Fellowship has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth sourcing to show it passes WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi Onel5969, I added several secondary sources including in-depth articles from the Chicago Tribune and Christian Science Monitor, please take a look at your convience. Thank you. Lenschulwitz ( talk) 19:36, 27 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Alexbrn ( talk) 21:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

• WP:SUMMARYNO, WP:ONUS, WP:FOC and the WP:BRD guide to WP:CONSENSUS may be helpful... — Paleo Neonate – 15:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Dear Lenschulwitz, Can you review Naseh Shaker page who interviewed Michael Springman as cited in the later page? Abdullah Ahmed M ( talk) 19:57, 3 September 2022 (UTC) reply