|
Please do not heckle the articles. If you see an error, you can correct it (with sources, please) or make your comments on Talk:Motorcycle land speed record. But not this. Thanks!-- Dbratland ( talk) 02:32, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Tom Green (designer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Basket of Puppies 04:06, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Great contribution. Thanks!
Great work! -- Kevlar ( talk • contribs) 18:28, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Infoboxes do not list citizenship for tennis players. They list the nation which they represent when playing tennis. Wimbledon requires you to state the country you play for and it goes into the records that way. Martina does not play for Czech Republic, she plays for USA though she has citizenship in both countries. Plus the flag icons represent what she played under until she retired. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 06:50, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
I found a flickr set here with several pictures of the memorial that can be uploaded from Flickr to the Commons with no problems. Which do you prefer? I like the side view of running Jim and the grave marker. Let me know and I will upload them. Gerry D ( talk) 19:00, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
I added them to the Commons page for Jim Thorpe. I will leave it up to you as to where to place them. Gerry D ( talk) 02:31, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Here is the link to the commons page. Gerry D ( talk) 11:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Thanks for your copyedits at The Concert in Central Park! :) GoP T C N 15:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks for your work on the plot for The White Ribbon. It has gone untouched for a while due to WP:OWN problems. It could use some further refinement in the introduction I think. At any rate, your version is much better. Obotlig ( talk) 07:35, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for that explanation. It's a good response to one of the two points I raised in my Edit summary. And that's a significant point. You didn't use an Edit summary at all, so it wasn't obvious what you were trying to achieve. Check out that link to see what I mean. Edit summaries are very valuable.
Given your explanation, I can now see value in your changes, although I still have problems with describing Julia Gillard as "the actual (and current) Prime Minister". It just seems clumsy. Maybe if the "(and current)" was dropped it would look nicer. That she is "current" is really irrelevant, and will one day be wrong anyway, but we'll still have this article.
So, go for it! (But use an Edit summary please.) HiLo48 ( talk) 18:27, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Nice work on the expansion. Good to see people actually editing for a change! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:48, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Personally I would put the names of the individual carriers in the production section as I only see them as scenery in the film. The names of the individual ships are interesting but too much detail for the plot summary. But I wouldn't go to the barricades over it. Britmax ( talk) 22:17, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
You added things such as "The main channels for the season were Movie Central and The Movie Network." and "then continued on that channel and Movie Central and The Movie Network" throughout the article and those are Fitz-worthy lies. Movie Central and The Movie Network each operate a channel jointly branded as HBO Canada. They commission shows almost always in tandem. When a reporter for the National Post files a story on MC & TMN's new and returning shows that doesn't actually mean the shows will be on Movie Central 1 & The Movie Network (aka the main channel); the only sure thing is the American imports from HBO will be on HBO Canada. If you had watched the first-run of each of the first three seasons you would know that not one of those 38 episodes actually premiered on The Movie Network or Movie Central 1 or any of their other channels; they all premiered on HBO Canada. The repeats of Call Me Fitz are found at various times on every channel in the TMN & MC respective collectives but it isn't the repeats that the article features. Some user-contributed-content sites have at times mixed repeats, first-run, and American dates in compiling episode guides and they can be a total mess. I have this little guide i go by: have a reference or two and if not then don't write about anything i am not absolutely certain about. A quick google of "call me fitz season 2 hbo" would have directed you to the press release about the season 2 premiere on HBO Canada. For that reason i am a little annoyed. That your edit prompted me to fix and expand a bit i suppose is a beneficial trade-off. Please try to avoid making such assumptions in the future. delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~ 02:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Jmg38, received message on my talk page, responded here. Best, -- Discographer ( talk) 10:03, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there! Do you have a source that indicates that King's use of three towns is a Lovecraft homage? If not, the claim will need to be removed. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa ( talk) 04:09, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jmg38, could you please include a reliable source for the date of birth you added to Neva Small? Thank you, -- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 19:09, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I was reminiscing on this Memorial Day, and missing my Dad, Carl "Griff" Baily. Jeff was a student of my Dad's at USAFA, and then his navigator at Udorn. I met him at least twice and I believe he was at my father's funeral. I would very much like to communicate with Jeff and wonder if you know of a way for me to contact him. Thank you, Cynthia Baily — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louwhodesigns ( talk • contribs) 16:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC) Louwhodesigns ( talk) 16:51, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Louwhodesigns
Sorry - don't know him nor any ideas on other ways to find him. Good luck with your search. Jmg38 ( talk) 07:59, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Is a better source. [1] Thus we can just use it. Best Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 05:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, that article is going through a long term rewrite, and the lead has been expanded quite a bit already as a result. The World Series portion of the article is already adequately summarized in the lead as it stands. See, as the expansion of the article continues, so does the lead. That means there's much more that's going to be added to it shortly. Since the lead does have some restrictions on length, I chose to remove the nicely written (but excessive detail) that you added. I think by the time every aspect of the story has been added to the article, the lead will be a solid four paragraphs. Dawnseeker2000 00:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
that your recent edit at Take a Letter, Maria, "(known for first play of numerous hits in the 1960s) " really needs a reference. Otherwise it is just your opinion. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 15:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
I have restored your edit. SLBedit ( talk) 12:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Please read WP:DISINFOBOX. There are many disadvantages to infoboxes in many articles. They are often helpful for articles about athletes and politicians, but most bio articles do not need infoboxes, and, indeed, many editors believe that they are harmful in most cases. Certainly, one should not add them to Featured Articles or Good Articles without first opening a Talk page discussion. The editors who improved those articles to the FA or GA level have obviously thought about the issue before and decided not to use an infobox. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 18:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to UEFA club competition records and statistics, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. SLBedit ( talk) 20:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Ravenswing. Your recent edit to the page The Miami Showband appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravenswing 20:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 17:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
APerson ( talk!) 17:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Airheads, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Sundayclose ( talk) 22:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
She's in fact 'knowingly disliked' by the Indians. Your version implies a different meaning altogether. — Vensatry (Talk) 07:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
No, what I was saying was that there have been tournaments in the past that have used one ball for the tournament itself and a different one for the final match. For example, at Euro 2008, they used the Europass for the group stage and knockout stage, but then changed to the Europass Gloria for the final. The same happened in 2012, when they had the Tango 12 for the group stage and knockout phase, and a silver-panelled version of the Tango 12 for the final. Maybe this is the first time a different ball has been used for the entirety of the knockout stage, but it's certainly not the first time two different balls have been used in a tournament. – Pee Jay 20:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Some means that "not all the analysts" wanted to see $1B, thus only "some analysts" would say that it was considered "a disappointment", while other analysts had their expectations met.
In lieu of saying "there were analysts who had their expectations met at $800 MM and there were also analysts who had their expectations met at $850 MM and there were analysts who were disappointed that it did not reach their expectations of $1B" - which I guess would be the most accurate way to state the whole long saga - how is it not fair to summarize as "some analysts considered it "a disappointment" for failing to reach $1 billion"? Readers will understand that this means that some were not disappointed and some were, without having to write every-single-analyst's-expectations.
Don't know if this is a concern that the shorter form is seen, perhaps, as being pro-BvS or con-BvS - it is merely a simple logic that some does not mean "all analysts", and readers will understand that there was a difference of opinion from analysts that is important enough to mention. (even if some are satisfied means pro-BvS, some are disappointed implies con-BvS, readers will understand that message that the movie does not carry a one-size-fits-all "a-ok" from all analysts). Jmg38 ( talk) 19:10, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
This is not a place to discuss the massive unendorsement cycle. Noting that there have been over three hundred notable un endorsements should go directly onto the page describing the controversy. The two article changes have both been reverted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theoallen1 ( talk • contribs) 17:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page I've Just Seen a Face has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Sundayclose ( talk) 23:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Please stop changing the ensigns to the 1921 colour - that is the jack. It was never the Canadian ensign. It is the ensign of government ships and was flown as the jack until 1966. Llammakey ( talk) 14:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
As the creator of these articles (many years ago), I want to thank you for the work you're doing improving their readability. Steve Smith ( talk) 03:15, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi there! I notice you edited the page Tuninter Flight 1153 to make the words "Canadian made" a link to the article Cineflex. I don't see how Cineflex is relevant there, so I removed the link. If it is relevant, maybe you could add the link back and include some explanation? Thank you! -- Tanner Swett ( talk) 14:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 09:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you've been busy undoing a lot of work by editors on several film pages. There is no reason why film plots cannot have either inline notes as to who plays whom, nor blue links to relevant topics within the plot summary. It is not, as you believe, overlinking, and I ask that you please revert the pages where you have been removing the aforesaid content. In case you are wondering, I have already checked with an experienced editor in the film project ( User:Niteshift36) that these are not examples of overlinking. Have a good rest of the day. ZarhanFastfire ( talk) 02:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the editing help you gave to Edward Lyman Abbott, several years ago. I have made substantial edits that I thought you might enjoy. Cheers! Flibirigit ( talk) 23:05, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Jmg38. I keep seeing your edit summary "box tools" on my watch list. I wish I knew how to make a barnstar with a Toolbox in it to say thanks but I'm not any good at doing that. Instead I'll just leave that link to the article with all the nice pics :-) Thanks again and cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 19:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey, GoneIn60, I did not see, until now, that you’ve already gone through a long and interesting discussion regarding Interstellar in recent weeks. I was not being mean-spirited on my edit and explanation regarding the number of links in the plot synopsis, but suspect (after seeing the cast discussion) that it might have seemed like that. Just in case, thought I’d check and make sure I didn’t rub a decent fellow editor the wrong way on a bad day. Doing it here to avoid opening wounds at Interstellar talk page or at your user talk page. Jmg38 ( talk) 19:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Jmg38 – appreciate your good work on this. Keep it up! Schwede 66 08:18, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Happy Christmas! | ||
Hello Jmg38, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD| Talk 01:51, 19 December 2018 (UTC) |
There is a discussion on the Martin Heidegger talk page that perhaps would be of interest to you.
One of your edits (to Anthony Pellicano) came up on my watch list, leading me to a trail of edits lacking a WP:RS. A reliable source is always required. Please click the link, read the policy and adhere to it. Thank you, Lindenfall ( talk) 18:49, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Antonia Rey, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 10:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Antonia Rey. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 ( talk) 14:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Is there a reason your tagging a bunch of editors with the not around template? Is it a specific subset of editors you are trying to identify for a specific purpose? -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Howdy. Your not around template caused an email to be sent to me notifying me of the change. I hadn't realised so much time had passed since my last edit. I've replaced the not around template with a semi-retired template, and will aim to reduce the lag-time between contributions. Thanks for your prompt. These things can do some good. Regards Wotnow ( talk) 22:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
In regards to undoing your revision on the plot, I felt you took away pertinent information that has been on there for a while. Did you feel it was too descriptive? Why did you remove the links? Why did you remove information about Sharon Tate in the film? There was very little to begin with. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 15:18, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
(Conversation continued at User talk:Samurai Kung fu Cowboy) Jmg38 ( talk) 16:06, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for responding to me. The other thing about Tate is it shows she's present in the film and involved with the Hollywood community. I understand what you're saying about the links. So if you feel some of them should be removed per guidelines I understand. I feel the make and models of the cars are important though as a lot of detail was put into recreating the exact car the Manson Family used for the murders in real life. The Cadillac, not as much, other than it's the same exact car that was used by Mr. Blonde in Reservoir Dogs. I personally think it should stay but if you feel it goes against the guidelines then I understand why you might remove it and I won't interfere. The Ford Galaxie is important though, as again, it's a detailed recreation of an important historical car. Also, through conversation if only one name is used for a character, it has been agreed by editors on the page that it should be the last name. Thank you again and now I more clearly understand where you're coming from. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 16:16, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for working on that with me. I edited it slightly again for clarity but didn't change anything you edited that we had discussed. Just in case you want to look at it again. They're very minor changes. Looks good! Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 19:50, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello again. I am attempting to add a reference on the page but I keep coming up against the same obstacle. It says I haven't entered a correct reference tag. Do you know how to fix this? Thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 02:52, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for getting back to me. I don't know how to place a copy of the reference here unfortunately. I really don't understand how to add references. My attempt I'd the last one on the Once Upon a Time in Hollywood page. If you're able to look at it there, great! If not, I don't know what to do. I just provided an external link for now. Again, thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 04:37, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 05:07, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. Hopefully it'll go smoother next time. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 14:43, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I appreciate all the information but I'm still not entirely grasping the entering of the references. Another editor was being a stickler about citations which is fine, as I'm sure it makes the page more credible. So I figured out how to create external links and get them on the reference list. I suppose that's ok but I'm guessing it's not ideal. By no means do I expect this of you but if you find yourself with some time and are able to fill them out I think it'd be great and much appreciated. I'm guessing either way someone will eventually. Thank you. I hope all is well. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 02:43, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
The thing I don't understand at all is how to archive it. Do I create an archive URL? Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 05:01, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
If so, how? Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 05:02, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Ok. Thank you. Maybe I don't have to do that. I thought I did. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 14:29, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. I thought I needed the archive info. Once I realized I didn't, it went smoothly. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 16:51, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
I just now edited my reversion - I didn't realize there were 2 templates so I only looked at the one template's page & didn't look at both. I explained the situation in my last edit summary. Thanks, Shearonink ( talk) 18:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey she was born in 1983 College Place Hawks ( talk) 19:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
(discussion regarding this change.)
Full set of parameters, where available, identifying information on m., div., died, his death, her death, etc, is laid out in the templates developed by 20 years of community template development. Might change in future via community evolution, but currently:
Uses tools per Template:Infobox person and Template:Marriage, which "is intended for use in infoboxes; specifically Template:Infobox person and templates calling Infobox person."
Uses tools, including "died", excluding children per spouse (info for body of article), per Template:Infobox person and Template:Marriage, which "is intended for use in infoboxes; specifically Template:Infobox person and templates calling Infobox person."
"Use of |end=
will cause a line break between the name and the dates", no additional line break needed when |end=
is used.
"Infoboxes already reduce text size to 88%, and MOS:FONTSIZE sets a lower limit for text size at 85% of the normal page font size, so it is not appropriate to use font size reduction when this template is used in an infobox."
"Plot" Jmg38 ( talk) 07:27, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
-- User:Martin Urbanec ( talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Damon Runyon's short story
"Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the
hot Tom and Jerry
No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well J38. MarnetteD| Talk 04:56, 18 December 2019 (UTC) |
Per WP:NOTBROKEN, please don't "fix" links to bypass redirects. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 08:27, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
That the plot summary for The Angry Birds Movie 2 has been reduced to almost 700 words, so I removed the WP:PLOTBLOAT template. OcelotCreeper ( talk) 03:25, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Kindly stop removing red links just because they are old. Specifically Admirals are inherently notable and any ship over 100 tons is likely to be notable Lyndaship ( talk) 11:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
The credits in the beginning are considered the beginning credits and the ending credits are by first appeared order. And there's no need to remove fully named roles in the cast section also since they were mentioned in the movie. BattleshipMan ( talk) 15:09, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Great job on honoring the missing Wikipedians! ◊PRAHLAD balaji ( M•T•A• C) This message was left at 22:15, 6 June 2020 (UTC) |
I think if you're going to refer to him by just one name, Sánchez is probably the one I would go for, but in the Anthony Martial article, it's the first time we've referred to him, so it doesn't make sense to pipe the article title to anything other than Alexis Sánchez. That article seems to consistently refer to him as just "Sánchez" despite saying in the lead that he is commonly referred to as just "Alexis". Either way, that doesn't make any difference for the Martial article. – Pee Jay 10:31, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Jmg38, in the infoboxes we only put the name of the team as it was in the year the rider first joined. More here: Template:Infobox cyclist. It would be nice if you could remove any lists you have added. Thanks. Bald Boris 09:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for sorting this out; I had meant to follow up my comment at Talk:Henry Cranke Andrews, but forgot. Peter coxhead ( talk) 09:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
I see that at [2] instead of citing the Washington Post article to which I drew their attention, IPNI cited me! Not a reliable source. Anyway, you've done good work on the lists. Peter coxhead ( talk) 21:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
I only learnt in the last week that if you deliberately link to a disambiguation page, you should follow the instructions at WP:INTDAB and always link to a page/redirect with "(disambiguation)" in its title. This stops both the bot and fellow editors 'correcting' you. Peter coxhead ( talk) 13:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Serra International, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page. ...
discospinster
talk 22:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello there, from Portugal,
regarding your question in this message (please see here https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:81.193.141.118&diff=cur), already have an account, this one obviously. Edit with the IP (static by the way) sometimes, after having been viciously stalked here. They have already discovered my IP address too, i want to leave the project (for lack of fun, it's been 14 years) but cannot seem to bring myself to do it.
Continue the good work, cheers -- Quite A Character ( talk) 06:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I took care of your request at WP:RM/TR, but just wanted you to know, in case you don't already, that you should be able to do these kinds of moves yourself. As long as there is not more than one edit at the redirect that points back to the article to be moved, any autoconfirmed editor should be able to move the article over the redirect. Station1 ( talk) 07:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Note: this was regarding move of Grobelno, Šmarje pri Jelšah to Grobelno, Slovenia. Jmg38 ( talk) 11:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello; thank you for your recent edits. Please retain the lists of former villages in the Slovenian municipality templates; they are useful indicators for missing material on Wikipedia, and in some cases they are the only information available for users searching for a particular toponym (and they are therefore informative for what the place was and where). You are welcome to help create the missing articles. Thank you. Doremo ( talk) 08:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Jmg38, Belgium's French Community is not exactly a speech community but a state. Though it is true that the three Communities are named after their official languages (=the languages officials must use), article 30 of the Constitution guarantees free language use all over Belgium except for public services and law courts. A majority of Belgians are proficient ( L1+ L2) French speakers, but Dutch has more mothertongue (L1) speakers than French. — The distribution of states is complex as every inhabitant of Belgium lives in three of them: Federal Belgium, one of the Regions, and one of the Communities. The exception is the Brussels-Capital Region which hosts parts of two Communities on its entire territory. Love — LiliCharlie ( talk) 00:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Jmg38, thanks for your good faith changes to alter links to either of the Wachowskis in numerous articles You will have noticed by now that I undid a bunch of them, in those cases in which simple links naming one sister, were altered to a piped link. As both names are already redirects, this is both unnecessary, and counterproductive. When the link already works, like " Lana Wachowski" and " Lilly Wachowski" both do, then there is no reason to alter them to piped links of the form [[The Wachowskis|Lana Wachowski]]. More explanation can be found at WP:NOPIPE and WP:NOTBROKEN. Thanks, Mathglot ( talk) 09:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
that is exactly the spot to use a single link, as they go to the same target, their joint biography
Hi, the sash Noémie Happart is wearing is a sash worn by Miss Belgium 2013 finalists, not the Miss Belgium 2013 winner which indeed was known only in January. The inscription on the sash is "Finaliste Miss Belgium 2013". -- Rashinseita ( talk) 11:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
No idea how you're doing it (doesn't seem to be AWB), but just an FYI that the short descriptions you've been adding to Belgian election articles are all going wrong (e.g. this). Cheers, Number 5 7 21:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Yes, I read the linked discussion. It agreed that the Wikipedia article on the Most Ancient European Towns Network should be deleted. Fine, I've no opinion on that. But, it did NOT say that every mention of the Most Ancient European Towns Network should be excised from Wikipedia. Emeraude ( talk) 09:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Yes. I read that. But, it did NOT say that every mention of the Most Ancient European Towns Network should be excised from Wikipedia. Emeraude ( talk) 10:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
It. Does. Not. Exist. Nothing to mention, since nothing is there. Can not list the members nor add their membership to each of their pages when there are, in fact, no members - because there is not and never was an organization to be a member of. Jmg38 ( talk) 10:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
The Talk Discussion is now opened to all Editors to comment on the Copyright and Trademark Infringement Lawsuit section for the article. Please visit the talk page for InvestigativeNews located at User_talk:InvestigativeNews
InvestigativeNews (
talk) 01:19, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Please refer to WP:NCIH as diacritics are not permitted in North American hockey articles. Deadman137 ( talk) 02:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Jmg38! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Marquis Chimps that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 11:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Jmg38. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Serra International, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonah Smith (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 18:30, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
List of Terminator (franchise) characters, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me 13:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Jmg38. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Serra International".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit to Ambulance (film) because you wrote in the plot summary, "Cam commits grand larceny by secretly giving some of the heist money, for which innocent people were wounded or killed, to Amy". This sounds biased and is not WP:NEUTRAL. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 12:48, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
I noticed your {{
Long plot}}
template on the article at
The Unforgivable. I had a go at trimming it down, but I don't have a word counting tool. I'll leave it to you to remove the tag, or leave it there if you think it's still too long. signed,
Willondon (
talk) 22:34, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Apologies for the rollback, it was a misclick. Have reverted myself. Mjroots ( talk) 10:26, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 08:07, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
What's the point of all these en-GB edits? Do you have a discussion to back this up? To me, they are pointless; this isn't wiktionary. The articles usually state on the talk page which English they are written in. These edits just bloat the "lead"... or "lede". Why does Color blindness need to open with 4 synonyms? Do we need to put every redirect in the lead? Curran919 ( talk) 08:09, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Jmg38,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡ 03:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 03:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Jmg38, hope you're doing well. I've been looking for help from editors who are familiar with editing on poker-related topics and saw that you'd made a few edits to some poker player Wikipedia articles. A little while back, I submitted a first draft of an article for GGPoker to Articles for Creation and it was declined; I've made some edits to address the issues from the reviewer's feedback and I'm trying to find editors who are willing to review the updated draft. In full disclosure, I work for NSUSLab, GGPoker's platform developer, and have a financial conflict of interest, which is why I submitted the draft via AfC. Is this something you'd be into helping with? Thanks! Chris H (GGPoker) ( talk) 08:10, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for removing that section at 50 goals in 50 games. I've wanted to do that for a long time but I didn't feel like getting into a fight with Leaf fans. They seemed pretty determined to get Matthews name on the list somehow. Masterhatch ( talk) 16:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the errors on scoring table. Keep in mind that any season from before the digital era could have these errors as the league went through their records and updated their site a few years ago, but in all likelihood nobody went through and fixed the numbers here. Deadman137 ( talk) 23:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between October and December 2022.
Hawkeye7 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 04:15, 11 March 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{
WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
I reverted your edit on the cast section of The Rock because it removes the necessity of who else was on it. If you want, put the majority of them on the Additionally list instead. BattleshipMan ( talk) 04:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
You are invited to this section of the Administrator noticeboard. BattleshipMan ( talk) 04:52, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Jmg38, could you point to the diff you found from 2010? The responsible diff I found was this one by a drive by IP from July 2008. Best, CMD ( talk) 01:37, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
For your great work revising Murder of Bobby Kent. Nice to see it on my watchlist getting better and better. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC) |
Just so we're clear, "roommates" as a concept is not restricted to describing those living in the exact same room, so your edit was unnecessary and potentially confusing with the addition of the term "sharehouse", whether linked or not (and ironically linked to the term "roommates" 🙄). So in total, a solution looking for a problem. — Joeyconnick ( talk) 19:50, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello Jmg38!
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, per your edit on List of former Emmerdale characters (the principal of which I agree with), it has now made a chronological error in the formatting of the list. Previously, the tables worked downwards in order of most to least recent of who had left, so if you were to swap them, you should have reversed the order of each individual table, like I have done on other former character lists. For example, in the 2023 table, Marshall Hamston should be the last person listed, as he left last week, rather than Priya Sharma, who departed in early 2023. Would you be willing to make such a large change? – Meena • 09:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
@ Thomas Basboll is edit warring and keeps removing the personal life section you added on Zoe McLellan's article. Can you defend the sourcing on the talk page? Jaydoggmarco ( talk) 04:21, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night and the Doctor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Hektor ( talk) 08:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
My apologies, that warning was for a different individual. :)
skarz (
talk) 14:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm EmilySarah99. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Princess Alice, Countess of Athlone have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. EmilySarah99 ( talk) 06:37, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Re this edit: perhaps the article on the college should be moved, then - you could request a move, or just boldly move it. The list entry ought surely to match the article title. (Bath, above in the list, is also a redirect). Pam D 11:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Greetings,
I've noticed you have recently edited numerous articles with the edit summary of "use consistent links" to explain removing links to embedded redirects. While the spirit of the effort is appreciated - it is actually unnecessary, amounts to busywork, and may need to be undone at a later date in cases of disambiguation (such as at John Diehl. Please take a moment to review WP:NOTBROKEN for more information regarding this. Thanks. --Picard's Facepalm • Made It So Engage! • 20:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
[[Franklin D. Roosevelt|Franklin Roosevelt]]
example at
WP:NOTBROKEN). If the unpiped direct link is already in use, stick with it throughout the article.
Jmg38 (
talk) 21:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Re this move you did, MOS:TITLECAPS says we should capitalize "Is". Please fix. Did you do others like that? Dicklyon ( talk) 20:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)