This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
You recently reverted my edit of the section concerning the annulment of Henry's marriage to Catherine of Aragon. I respectfully disagree because, while I agree that "all hope" was already perfectly acceptable, the sentence in question continues " . . of tempting Catherine to retire to a nunnery or otherwise stay quiet were lost." In my opinion, "all hopes . . . . . . were lost" or, perhaps, "all hope . . . . . was lost" are better grammar than the current "all hope . . . . were lost". It was, therefore, the term "were" that implied the plural, not, as you suggest, the term "all". Toodeep ( talk) 04:38, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Help copy edit for article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you. Johginwei ( talk) 08:45, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors 2018 Annual Report
Our
2018 Annual Report is now ready for review.
Highlights:
– Your project coordinators:
Miniapolis,
Baffle gab1978,
Jonesey95,
Reidgreg and
Tdslk.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 21:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Dhtwiki - no offence for the revert, but man those messages drive me around the twist :) They are long, verbose, reek of self importance, make talk pages / archives hard to navigate, and are rarely of historical interest. It would be as if for every minor copy edit you left a three para detailed talk page post explaining who you are, what you did, and that you have a talk if anybody disagrees. Nonsense IOW, when the edits are in the article history. Ceoil ( talk) 01:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
The (old school) League of Copy Editors Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copy edits totaling over 30,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE January 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 03:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 5th Place | ||
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copyediting 1 long article during the GOCE January 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 03:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Old Articles, 5th Place | ||
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copyediting ten old articles during the GOCE January 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 03:26, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
Hi I just want to say sorry about the reverts for Hiten Tejwani. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.119.166 ( talk) 20:29, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE February 2019 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 21:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC) |
I noticed how you've been copyediting the Moscow University in Tashkent article for quite a while and I decided to check out your user page. You seem quite the dedicated editor, with copyediting especially. I'm a new editor- I tried to get into editing Wikipedia last year but I found myself much more addicted to reading the articles as opposed to editing them! Anyways, I was wondering if you could point me in a helpful direction so I could contribute more effectively. Thanks a million.
Miscellaneous Machinery (
talk) 22:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors March 2019 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the March newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2018. All being well, we're planning to issue these quarterly in 2019, balancing the need to communicate widely with the avoidance of filling up talk pages. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. January Drive: Thanks to everyone for the splendid work in January's Backlog Elimination Drive. We removed copyedit tags from all of the articles tagged in our original target months of June, July and August 2018, and by 24 January we ran out of articles. After adding September, we finished the month with 8 target articles remaining and 842 left in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 48 requests for copyedit in January. Of the 31 people who signed up for this drive, 24 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the February Blitz. Of the 15 people who signed up, 13 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed 32 copyedits, including 15 requests. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: As of 23:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 108 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 851 articles. March Drive: The month-long March drive is now underway; the target months are October and November 2018. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Sign up here! Election reminder: It may only be March but don't forget our mid-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I've seen you revert that user's deletion of sourced content. I've opened up a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Deletion_of_reliable_Indian_Government_sourced_content_from_Indian_state_articles, your valuable inputs will be appreciated. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 10:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
The (modern) Guild of Copy Editors Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copy edits totaling over 40,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE March 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 18:53, 3 April 2019 (UTC) |
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Words, 5th Place | ||
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copyediting 33,742 total words during the GOCE March 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 18:53, 3 April 2019 (UTC) |
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 4th Place | ||
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copyediting two long articles during the GOCE March 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 18:53, 3 April 2019 (UTC) |
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Longest Article, 2nd Place | ||
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copyediting one of the five longest articles – 11,802 words – during the GOCE March 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 18:53, 3 April 2019 (UTC) |
The Cleanup Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copy edits totaling over 6,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE April 2019 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Tdslk ( talk) 02:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC) |
copy-editing | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 1910 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
hello | |
im new to this whole thing so please forgive my oversight i just was so overwhelmed with the site, you see im incarcerated and am only able to get on this site thanks for the help Xaricam ( talk) 22:49, 23 May 2019 (UTC) |
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copy edits totaling over 60,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE May 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Tdslk ( talk) 21:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC) |
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 3rd Place | ||
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copyediting 2 long articles during the GOCE May 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Tdslk ( talk) 21:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC) |
Hi,
I see you are having fun trying to sort the images on the Hardwick Hall page. I'm not going to meddle but would like to make a couple of observations:
1) The chimney piece picture is somewhat overwhelming at the moment and is not really in the right section to justify it's "left" positioning.
2) The picture of the Old Hall would possibly be better in the Today section, it's at odds with the other pictures where it is. Though I see the logic of grouping the exterior shots together. Ideally the building should have its own section or even article.
On the Wimpole Estate page I've tried a gallery of interior images to group them together.
Please feel free to ignore me! Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 08:57, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding my edit on Rule, Britannia!: the indicative mood would have been Britannia rules the waves. -- jftsang 08:21, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
(from the subjunctive mood, expressing a wish, to the indicative mood), with the edit summary, "Unexplained, seemingly OR; why isn't "rule" imperative mood?" So, what you labeled the subjunctive mood, I though should be labeled otherwise. I don't have a quarrel with "rules" being labeled as indicative. Dhtwiki ( talk) 22:40, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors June 2019 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since March 2019. You can unsubscribe from our mailings at any time; see below. Election time: Nomination of candidates in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 1 June, and voting will take place from 16 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. June Blitz: Our June blitz will soon be upon us; it will begin at 00:01 on 16 June (UTC) and will close at 23:59 on 22 June (UTC). The themes are "nature and the environment" and all requests. March Drive: Thanks to everyone for their work in March's Backlog Elimination Drive. We removed copyedit tags from 182 of the articles tagged in our original target months October and November 2018, and the month finished with 64 target articles remaining from November and 811 in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 22 requests for copyedit in March; the month ended with 34 requests pending. Of the 32 people who signed up for this drive, 24 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. April Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the April Blitz; the blitz ran from 14 to 20 April (UTC) inclusive and the themes were Sports and Entertainment. Of the 15 people who signed up, 13 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed 60 copyedits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: As of 04:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 267 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stands at 605 articles. May Drive: During the May Backlog Elimination Drive, Guild copy-editors removed copyedit tags from 191 of the 192 articles tagged in our original target months of November and December 2018, and January 2019 was added on 22 May. We finished the month with 81 target articles remaining and a record low of 598 articles in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 24 requests for copyedit during the May drive, and the month ended with 35 requests pending. Of the 26 people who signed up for this drive, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
The Cleanup Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copy edits totaling over 6,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE June 2019 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 00:03, 25 June 2019 (UTC) |
And thanks for voting in the elections! – Reidgreg ( talk) 00:03, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
I saw you reverted one of my changes to "Death Wish" because it had "no relevance" to the movie. However, there are also other items in that same section which have no relevance to the movie.
An example is these 2 sentences: "Actress Helen Martin, who had a minor role, subsequently appeared in the television sitcoms Good Times and 227. Sonia Manzano (Maria from Sesame Street), has an uncredited role as a supermarket checkout clerk."
The whole paragraph contained in the "Cast" section are a collection of actor references of their other works or simply highlight their their names which then take you to other Wiki pages about them.
So, how are these any different than my addition to the article?
I thought the whole idea of a wiki was to provide interesting and factual information to the readers of the article, which this additional paragraph provides. Why is my sentence addition any different? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aspenguy2 ( talk • contribs) 16:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
OK, thanks for the info on signing my posts and edits. I'm relatively new to the editing process and constructive criticism is welcome. I'm glad we are able to come an agreement on my edits regarding Marcia. When viewing older movies, it's interesting to see actors in very early roles and how they've continued to work in the industry. Aspenguy2 ( talk) 15:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
I'm only a casual Wikipedia editor, reverting vandalism and fixing typos whenever I see them, so I'm not really sure what to do when I see a repeat vandal, but someone you've previously warned for vandalism has vandalized another article. The user's name is Mrbiglee, and the article he vandalized was Weight training. Hopefully this is the right way to report this kind of thing when I see it, and sorry for bothering you if it's not. 219.117.229.83 ( talk) 05:19, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
The (modern) Guild of Copy Editors Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copy edits totaling over 40,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE July 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 22:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC) |
The drive had the highest editor participation since May 2015, and brought the copy editing backlog to a record low of 585 articles! Much thanks for taking part! – Reidgreg ( talk) 22:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
...for repairing a few of my f[oul] ups as I tried to quickly remove hundreds of unnecessary double spaces yesterday. Uh, technical question: are two spaces before a brace required? If so, why?-- Brogo13 ( talk) 17:49, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I write to inform you that the edit warrior that for years has agressively tried to lower the percentage of European Mexicans on several articles such as White Latin Americans or Demographics of Mexico is back at it now in the article of Mexico [1], as before he is using false accusations to try to pass his edits as justified (i.e. he just said that a book published in 1960 is from 1800). Your support has been highly valuable to me before and I'd appreciate if you lend me a hand on this, thanks in advance. Pob3qu3 ( talk) 02:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello Dhtwiki and thanks for your reply. To answer your question, the issue in the article of Mexico is the same than the one there was with the editor Wikiedro in the article White Latin Americans some months ago [11] [12] [13] (the edit summaries are, in fact very similar, this is, the editor incurs in WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT and argues that the surveys published by Mexico's government are not about race even though the entire topic is about races at the point that the documents often have the words race and racial on the title aswell as ignoring the sources that allude to Mexicans having European appearance, this going hand-to-hand with removing reliable sources from the article [14] [15] [16] (looking back, we had this problem with another account little more than a year ago, the account ignorantes22 [17] [18] who claimed to be from Chile [19] just like Wikiedro has stated aswell [20]). As you can see this kind of vandalism disguised of "honest outrague" is not new, and it's been repelled thanks to the collaboration of various users that recognize the persistent uncivil behavior the operator of the aforementioned accounts display, that's why I would appreciate your support, because if I do it alone the other editor will drag me to edit warring territory where I may get sanctioned (being sanctioned is something the operator of the account Hueyxocoatzin doesn't care about because said account is a throw away one, in fact that may be what he wants). Thanks for your time. Pob3qu3 ( talk) 19:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
I changed "discovered" because indigenous peoples already lived in America, thus they discovered it. 50.68.172.46 ( talk) 15:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for bothering you again but the GA reviewer said something about the article's prose. You think I should abort the review? Tintor2 ( talk) 13:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
The Modest Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copy edits totaling over 2,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE August 2019 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 16:18, 28 August 2019 (UTC) |
Thanks for supported my recent, albeit unsuccessful RfA. Your support was greatly appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC) |
Thanks for the revert of the post to Earth by Eivindgh. I thought it was unnecessary but decided to only correct his obvious (to me) errors. I left it to another to actually revert. — Joe Kress (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Although I'm not new to Wiki I don't spend as much time writing and editing as I would like. So I apologize if I make mistakes here.
You say, Advocacy can be either "for" or "against". Having spent an hour or so looking at dictionaries and Googling examples of the word's usage it does seem that the formula advocate for, where advocate is a verb, is indeed sometimes used in the US. Outside the US it isn't, but as the subject of the article was American it was presumptuous of me to change it.
However there are American writers on language who consider advocate for to be a recent and unnecessary addition: https://www.alphadictionary.com/blog/?p=149 And none of the nineteen examples of the word's use at Lexico include it: https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/advocate
Regards,
Wes Pacek ( talk) 05:30, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I write to inform you that the edit warrior that for years has agressively tried to lower the percentage of European Mexicans on several articles such as White Latin Americans or Demographics of Mexico is back at it now in the article of Mexico [21], as before he is using false accusations to try to pass his edits as justified (i.e. he just said that a book published in 1960 is from 1800). Your support has been highly valuable to me before and I'd appreciate if you lend me a hand on this, thanks in advance. Pob3qu3 ( talk) 02:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello Dhtwiki and thanks for your reply. To answer your question, the issue in the article of Mexico is the same than the one there was with the editor Wikiedro in the article White Latin Americans some months ago [31] [32] [33] (the edit summaries are, in fact very similar, this is, the editor incurs in WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT and argues that the surveys published by Mexico's government are not about race even though the entire topic is about races at the point that the documents often have the words race and racial on the title aswell as ignoring the sources that allude to Mexicans having European appearance, this going hand-to-hand with removing reliable sources from the article [34] [35] [36] (looking back, we had this problem with another account little more than a year ago, the account ignorantes22 [37] [38] who claimed to be from Chile [39] just like Wikiedro has stated aswell [40]). As you can see this kind of vandalism disguised of "honest outrague" is not new, and it's been repelled thanks to the collaboration of various users that recognize the persistent uncivil behavior the operator of the aforementioned accounts display, that's why I would appreciate your support, because if I do it alone the other editor will drag me to edit warring territory where I may get sanctioned (being sanctioned is something the operator of the account Hueyxocoatzin doesn't care about because said account is a throw away one, in fact that may be what he wants). Thanks for your time. Pob3qu3 ( talk) 19:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
There's no such thing as a "four-dot ellipsis" – it's a typo. If there's a
contextually important period. ... (that's period, nbsp, ellipsis, plain space), go for it. Or them (brackets). Or leave [all of] us still guessing, as I did. But please fix it.
Thanks.--
Brogo13 (
talk) 18:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
You may recall that, in February, an editor pointed out that it was POV for "List of countries and dependencies by area" to declare Mexico to be the largest Amerindian-culture country. He or she presented the argument in the Talk page, and we quickly developed a consensus that the information was extraneous to the article and POV, and it was removed from the article. Here is the Talk page discussion.
Well, a new editor, fresh back from two edit-warring suspensions, brought back that extraneous and POV information (among other things). I reverted his "good-faith edit" and pointed out that the issue had been discussed previously in the Talk page and that a consensus had emerged that it should not be included in the article. He immediately reverted, wit his exit summary consisting of "ok." I then found the old Talk page discussion (which, as you saw, was archived) and included the link in my second reversion. He immediately reverted again, with his edit summary being "Your opinion. Thanks!" Here's the edit history. Since I can't revert him a third time within 24 hours, and since he's obviously going to ignore an appeal to discuss in the Talk page, I was wondering if you'd like to help out in bringing the article back to NPOV. Thank you, AuH2ORepublican ( talk) 15:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors September 2019 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2019. June election: Reidgreg was chosen as lead coordinator, and is being assisted by Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Tdslk, and first-time coordinator Twofingered Typist. Jonesey95 took a respite after serving for six years. Thanks to everyone who participated! June Blitz: From 16 to 22 June, we copy edited articles on the themes of nature and the environment along with requests. 12 participating editors completed 35 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. July Drive: The year's fourth backlog-elimination drive was a great success, clearing all articles tagged in January and February, and bringing the copy-editing backlog to a low of five months and a record low of 585 articles while also completing 48 requests. Of the 30 people who signed up, 29 copyedited at least one article, a participation level last matched in May 2015. Final results and awards are listed here. August Blitz: From 18 to 24 August, we copy edited articles tagged in March 2019 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: As of 03:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 413 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stood at 599 articles, close to our record month-end low of 585. Requests page: We are experimenting with automated archiving of copy edit requests; a discussion on REQ Talk (permalinked) initiated by Bobbychan193 has resulted in Zhuyifei1999 writing a bot script for the Guild. Testing is now underway and is expected to be completed by 3 October; for this reason, no manual archiving of requests should be done until the testing period is over. We will then assess the bot's performance and discuss whether to make this arrangement permanent. September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
The Cleanup Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copy edits totaling over 12,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 17:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC) |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copy edits totaling over 10,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE October 2019 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 11:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC) |
The Copy Editor's 10K Star | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copy-editing at least one individual article of more than 10,000 words during the most recent Guild of Copy Editors' Drive or Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg ( talk) 11:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC) |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copy edits totaling over 20,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE November 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Tdslk ( talk) 04:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC) |
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 4th Place | ||
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copyediting 2 long articles during the GOCE November 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Tdslk ( talk) 04:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC) |
Guild of Copy Editors December 2019 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the December 2019 GOCE newsletter, an update of Guild happenings since the September edition. Our Annual Report should be ready in late January. Election time: Nominations for the election of a new tranche of Guild coordinators to serve for the first half of 2020 will be open from 1 to 15 December. Voting will then take place and the election will close on 31 December at 23:59 UTC. Positions for Guild coordinators, who perform the important behind-the-scenes tasks that keep our project running smoothly, are open to all Wikipedians in good standing. We welcome self-nominations so please consider nominating yourself if you've ever thought about helping out; it's your Guild and it doesn't run itself! September Drive: Of the thirty-two editors who signed up, twenty-three editors copy edited at least one article; they completed 39 requests and removed 138 articles from the backlog, bringing the backlog to a low of 519 articles. October Blitz: This event ran from 13 to 19 October, with themes of science, technology and transport articles tagged for copy edit, and Requests. Sixteen editors helped remove 29 articles from the backlog and completed 23 requests. November Drive: Of the twenty-eight editors who signed up for this event, twenty editors completed at least one copy edit; they completed 29 requests and removed 133 articles from the backlog. Our December Blitz will run from 15 to 21 December. Sign up now! Progress report: From September to November 2019, GOCE copy editors processed 154 requests. Over the same period, the backlog of articles tagged for copy editing was reduced by 41% to an all-time low of 479 articles. Request archiving: The archiving of completed requests has now been automated. Thanks to Zhuyifei1999 and Bobbychan193, YiFeiBot is now archiving the Requests page. Archiving occurs around 24 hours after a user's signature and one of the templates {{ Done}}, {{ Withdrawn}} or {{ Declined}} are placed below the request. The bot uses the Guild's standard "purpose codes" to determine the way it should archive each request so it's important to use the correct codes and templates. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators; Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list.
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
"Trivial, vague, and apparently unsourced; what constitutes "Western" and why is that important to mention that US is an outlier?"
Trivial: No argument there
Vague, unsourced: Open google and enter western world capital punishment. View result
Western: Look up Western World
Why is it important?: It is not important but intriguing the most advanced nation in most areas is not advanced in some areas.
B. Fairbairn (
talk) 10:22, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
The Cleanup Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Dhtwiki for copy edits totaling over 6,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE December 2019 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Mini apolis 21:59, 22 December 2019 (UTC) |