Welcome!
Hello, Debollweevil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Nunquam Dormio 07:46, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 23:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there! I found my way to your talk page via some of the pages on my watchlist, and I thought I might complement you on your fine observational skills. Concening H.H. Holmes, I noticed that the entire article has been blanked due to a copyright concern. This pains me to no end. Not because I particularily liked that article (I never once laid eyes on it, actually), I just hate to see no article where an article should be. In my opinion, you are the guy to right this wrong! If you have any good print resources, perhaps you could turn it into, at the very least, a stub. Then we will sit back and watch it grow... like an ugly, haphazard step-child; like a crazy kid who eats way to much candy. We will watch it grow into a beautiful article about a scary dude. Or not. But if interested, let me know. Regards, Hamster Sandwich ( talk) 16:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm aware of the copyright concern on that page; I'm thinking it might be taken off soon, though. I wish someone had a copy of the movie available that is in question so that the specific parts could be analyzed and compared to the article. I would be up for helping with certain parts of the article if it does in fact need to be reconstructed (once the admins make a decision), but I also think some people have put hard work into other parts that were likely not plagiarized, and I don't want to see those pieces disappear. I'm prepared to act however needed based on what administrators decide to do with the page!
...Also, I certainly appreciate the compliments! ;) --- Debollweevil ( talk) 18:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
As I suspected, the article was restored. Still, I plan to contribute some to that article and to many others as well. I am a man of many interests, so if you see any article that you would like assistance with or think I could help improve, be sure to let me know! My subjects of particular interest are social sciences and science/ chemistry, but I am open to researching and learning on basically anything that I find interesting (which includes most things!).
Regards, and I look forward to working with you on projects in the future! --- Debollweevil ( talk) 15:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey man good work on this article. Could you please weigh in as a 3O in the talk page? I really want this info to say but I want it to be well done wiki-style. Best, Speedstyle ( talk) 02:57, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
When I have been doing something for a while, I develop a nose for it, and sometimes when I look at the details, I find that my nose made the wrong judgment. I thought that was what was going on, and apparently I was wrong. Please don't take it the wrong way because I completely did not mean anything bad about you or Snoop God. Speedstyle ( talk) 05:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
I noticed your removal of uncited (and terribly phrased) methadone cost data. Under the Analgesic section, I added quite a few references to it being preferred for pain patients due to lower cost. Specific costs are rarely noted, however, since this depends on far too many factors (especially for a medical journal to get into). This section did contain some other specific references to cost, but I didn't mess with it too much, just added the numerous citations from unique medical studies that refer to it as being preferable in certain cases due to lower cost. Jqrt ( talk) 23:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
I´ve just noticed you classified plastic scm wikipedia site as likely to be deleted. I don´t really know what reasons lead you to do so. About lacking independent reliable sources i don´t really know what these are. All external references put in belong to a independent software publications. Could you please point out more specificly what content is conflicting with wikipedia´s policy?
Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alejandro66 ( talk • contribs) 14:07, 5 October 2010 (UTC) Alejandro66 ( talk) 14:22, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Brandon Jacobs with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trusilver 03:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brandon Jacobs. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:41, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Eagles
24/7
(C) 03:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Debollweevil ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Someone uses my computer and makes this same edit randomly. I'm sorry, I'll not let it happen again. Debollweevil ( talk) 05:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per below; we will now have to extend the block to indefinite. You'd be better off starting a new account and being more secure with the password. — Daniel Case ( talk) 05:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.