Welcome to Wikipedia, Bomberswarm2! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
Dismas and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Dismas| (talk) 10:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
The article Gino and Mark Stocco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article fails WP:NOTNEWS
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AussieLegend (
✉) 05:45, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Gino and Mark Stocco for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gino and Mark Stocco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gino and Mark Stocco until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AussieLegend ( ✉) 14:22, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
American Dad!, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
DonIago (
talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Who is Mike Shennan?
Open Mike is not a Wikipedia page. Xx236 ( talk) 10:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bomberswarm2, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Grayfell ( talk) 07:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{{1}}}]]. The sock account has been blocked per the evidence at SPI. Future puppetry will result in this account being blocked.
RickinBaltimore (
talk) 19:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Reverted edit on First inauguration of Lyndon B. Johnson
I removed this statement from the article, which I later found you had added: "As of 2017, it is also the last official inaugration (sic) to take place on a day other than January 20th." That is plainly incorrect because the inauguration of Gerald Ford occurred on August 9, 1974. (Others might also count Reagan's second inauguration and either or both of Obama's, but I wouldn't.) I didn't flag it as vandalism because it seems to have been a mere factual error, quite possibly because LBJ was the last President to be sworn in due to the death of his predecessor (Ford's predecessor Nixon resigned), as well as the last President sworn in by anyone other than a Chief Justice. -- RBBrittain ( talk) 07:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Conflict of Interest regarding User:Bomberswarm2. Thank you.
UNSC Luke 1021 (
talk) 16:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
|
I think this user is pretty alright. Bit odd, but totally cool. They are an equal peer and try to stay NPOV. I'm personally glad they are on Wikipedia. Hopefully, this post doesn't bother them. If it does, they can just remove it. XD Endercase ( talk) 18:48, 4 March 2017 (UTC) |
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Rather than calling someone lazy, perhaps read what I actually wrote. I said it's too difficult to go through history to find exactly the most recent occurrence, not finding a reference too difficult; I said the record is too difficult unless ref explicitly states so. Your initial edit of adding the note was incorrect by stating it was the first time in VFL/AFL history and you made an unwarranted assumption, I corrected it by removing it and saying it wasn't true. Please remember before adding information on Wikipedia that everything needs to be
cited and please avoid adding incorrect information based on an assumption in the future.
Flickerd (
talk) 14:12, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
its good to meet someone here! have you heard of PINGAS? 75.171.21.21 ( talk) 00:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Bomberswarm2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 12:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Bomberswarm2! Questions about the above “Alert”? I wrote a quick & dirty FAQ—check it out here. If you have any questions about policies or editing or anything else just ask me on my talk page :-) – Lionel( talk) 05:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
you have a long history of breaking wiki rules and to show how much your actively trying to make Wikipedia worse 1.the 1972 New York edit clearly trying to make nixon look good 2.the bellwether edit once again trying to make the republicans look good backing it up with an unrelated source 3.Massachusetts once again trying to make the republicans look good oh yippee the states former governor won one percent more than the guy that lost Indiana super 4.1948 polls showed Clinton leading by just 6 electoral votes hardly a landslide 5.home states thats still his home state 6.d.c 72 how is winning 22% notable 7.ingratiation come on 8.that time you just used a sock puppet to vandalize the birther page and then claimed discrimination classy
and those are just the ones i've found so do us all a favour just stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drowningseagull ( talk • contribs) 09:43, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
In the 1992 Montana election map you produced, there is an error for one county: Hill County was actually won by Clinton with ~45% of the vote, whereas the map shows it being won by Bush instead. 47.19.33.202 ( talk) 16:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Bomberswarm2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
331dot (
talk) 09:54, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Bomberswarm2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Blocked for what? What is this garbage about me using an account called Drowning seagull? Several months ago this troll started reverting my edits and leaving messages like the one a few posts above this on my talk page (and look back in my talk page history, there were several more that I deleted because they were just baseless attacks and threats). I searched in the Wikipedia WP:xxx pages for a way to report DrowningSeagull as harrassing me, but I couldn't find a simple page to post a link to my talk page to, so I decided to ignore what he was doing. And now months later you ban me for no reason? Where is this so called admission of "having used User:Drowningseagall to vandalize"? Because I would to see it, since DrowningSeagull is an account that is not mine, rather someone who has harassed me for months. Nevermind, I just found this pathetic "confession" on Drowningseagull's talk page, which I went to to try to find out what this had to do with me; "plz unblock i wont vandalized i performed constructive edits on me Bomberswarm2 account Yes, there is no doubt, this is defiantly a confession, a horrendously misspelled line of zero effort garbage. Let me guess, if he had of written 331dot instead of bomberswarm2 you would be banned, right? So If insead of this, I wrote "me sorry, I am good edir on account named xxxxx" any random account name I typed there would be banned? Edit: After looking at that 'guide to appealing blocks', apparently I should post evidence here. So here's two I quickly found on my talk page history, telling me never to edit wikipedia again, following which he would revert dozens of my edits I made on various political articles, on the claim of 'bias', and every few days, revert another one of my edits. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Bomberswarm2&diff=863686734&oldid=845953120 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Bomberswarm2&diff=839115894&oldid=821930937
Accept reason:
To another reviewer, I must leave my computer and cannot look at this closely for a bit, if I made a gross error feel free to unblock. 331dot ( talk) 10:27, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Although I saw the comment by Drowningseagall ( talk · contribs) claiming to be Bomberswarm2, as see no evidence that this is correct. Unless there's an good hand/bad hand issue here (and I see no evidence of that either) I feel the block is unjustified. I will raise at WP:AN for more opinions. O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 10:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- I apologize for my error in blocking you and the problems it caused you. I would understand you not forgiving this- I can only say that I have learned from this and will work to be different in the future. Please accept my apologies. Thank you. 331dot ( talk) 22:33, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Joo Molotov attempted to frame you again. -- Yamla ( talk) 11:04, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
I hate cats — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joo Molotov ( talk • contribs) 23:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
I kindly invite you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election#The Bolding issue to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn ( talk) 19:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in the bolding issue of the election infobox earlier. We are now holding a final vote in order to reach a clear and final consensus. Please take a moment to review our discussion and vote in Template talk:Infobox election#Final voting. Lmmnhn ( talk) 14:52, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Can you explain this? User talk:DrowningSeagull is based Acroterion (talk) 12:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Acroterion, Look at this. Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 12:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
-
Acroterion, And
this, i think its proper to revoke TPA
Megan☺️
Talk to the monster 12:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I already looked at that and at
Bomberswarm (
talk ·
contribs)
Acroterion
(talk) 12:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- How about looking at the section above labeled "December 2018" or ask @ 331dot: . Doing this would of been far more useful than wasting my time with this obvious well known troll again. Bomberswarm2 ( talk) 01:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I already looked at that and at
Bomberswarm (
talk ·
contribs)
Acroterion
(talk) 12:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Bomberswarm2! Re. Burn for You not being on Live Baby Live, are you thinking of the DVD movie rather than the audio CD?
Side note: DrowningSeagull is back under a couple of new names and still claiming to be you. He won’t last long though.
Cheers! Pelagic ( messages ) – (13:57 Sat 07, AEST) 03:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. –
bradv 15:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)