A tag has been placed on Beatboxing dog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ttonyb ( talk) 23:57, 11 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Aunt jennifer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Acroterion _(talk) 05:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC) reply

The article Battle of Klagenfurt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hoax. At Klagenfurt the only mention of Napoleon is in 1809 and not 1797. In 1797 he was in Italy, see War of the First Coalition. At the time this battle was supposed to have taken place the Treaty of Campo Formio was almost completed after five months negotiations. Based on the edit summary for the creation of this I think this may also be from a game. Google scholar has no hits whatsoever.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CambridgeBayWeather ( talk) 05:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Luna the Leaping cow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. hang on If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Dream out loud ( talk) 21:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Luna the Leaping cow, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{ hang on}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot ( talk) 21:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Aunt Jennifer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Buggie111 ( talk) 21:45, 10 April 2011 (UTC) reply

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Alexf ^(talk) 00:00, 11 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello Battlesnake1,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Blackhorse riders a desperate last stand,an extraordinary rescue mission,and the Vietnam battle America forgot, may be copied from http://us.macmillan.com/blackhorseriders/PhilipKeith. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot ( talk) 00:29, 14 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Homeland Security Market Research, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Times Square bomb attack ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DeCavalcante crime family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sicillian ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albanian Rebellion of 1997, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rentier ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Dear Battlesnake1,

In November 2013 you created the page Homeland Security Market Research, which claims that its subject is a part of the US Department of Homeland Security. However, you left no source that corroborates this claim. Could you please join the discussion at Talk:Homeland Security Market Research regarding this issue? QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 14:17, 28 May 2014 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating nonsense pages. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   Dougweller ( talk) 14:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC) reply

This was after I read the discussion at [1] about the Homeland Research article you created and seeing the number of hoax or other unsatisfactory articles you have created. You can be unblocked if you can explain why you created them and what you will do in the future to make sure this doesn't happen again. An agreement not to create new articles or only to do them in your user space and then ask for review would help. Dougweller ( talk) 14:52, 29 May 2014 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Battlesnake1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

Acknowledgement and apology for misinformation Battlesnake1 ( talk) 20:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

No. The conditions for unblock were set out in the previous declined request; adequate answers are required. -- Anthony Bradbury ^"talk" 20:25, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Battlesnake1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

Agreement to the conditions in the Block explanation

Accept reason:

This block is due to the EXTENSIVE creation of inappropriate articles on Wikipedia. User has agreed to the following restrictions:

• they will not create any live articles in articlespace, or move articles into articlespace
• they may draft articles in their userspace, but they must be reviewed using the WP:AFC process
• they will not create any hoax article, even in userspace

Violation of any of these conditions of unblock will result in immediate indefinite reblock the panda ₯’ 00:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC) reply

This is about the "Homeland Security Market Research" page that had me blocked; the reason I created that page was that on the article about Improvised explosive devices, the HSMR was mentioned but the page did not exist so I decided to create it. While creating it, there was not much information available except for the website and an online article. As for the reason it was removed because of false information, I looked at the aforementioned official website and found out they were involved in the Homeland Security industry, they were actually not involved with the actual Department of Homeland Security. I am terribly sorry for this and I agree to the condition to never create new articles unless I create them on my user space first for review.

The "About us" section of the website. The section in the Improvised Explosive Device Wikipedia page that mentions the HSMR. The online magazine article.

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Woodroar ( talk) 04:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi there, when editing the Talk page on the Gamergate controversy it would be helpful if you put a comment in saying which section you are editing. If you click the 'Edit' link next to the section header the edit form will pre-populate the edit summary for you. As it's a busy page it helps other editors to know which discussion is being updated so that they can ignore updates to discussions they're not following or a part of. Thanks! — Strongjam ( talk) 15:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC) reply

I'm confused. Were you aware that your edit, which you described as "Included a citation linking to a New York Times "Bits" article covering Intel pulling ads from Gamasutra," also "removed the description of the allegations against Zoe Quinn as being false, and ... inserted a claim that the controversy involves 'corruption in journalism?'" I am concerned your account or computer are compromised. Please respond to this post haste. Thanks! Hipocrite ( talk) 15:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC) reply

What gives you the idea my account is compromised? Please clarify for me. Thank you. Battlesnake1 ( talk) 15:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC) reply

You don't recall the contents of edits you made. Hipocrite ( talk) 15:34, 22 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

I've noticed you've edited a number of high school and college infoboxes so that the name of the school appears instead of the school's URL in the website category. This is problematic, since an editor could replace the URL with, say, a URL to a porn site, but the name of the school would appear in the infobox. If another editor did not catch the substitution and revert, an unsuspecting reader could click on it and be taken to the porn site. Please stop making these edits. Also, please note the standard is to use {{ URL}}, not the brackets you've been using (see Template:Infobox). Thanks. Contributor321 ( talk) 05:50, 11 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello @ Battlesnake1:, thank you for working on those school URLs. But I noticed that you still "hide" the URLs in infoboxes and don't use the {{URL}} template as recommended in the Template:infobox school documentation - see [ [2]] for example. Please make sure to use syntax like website = {{URL|ahs-fusd-ca.schoolloop.com}} for the website parameter in infoboxes and do not overwrite the original URL information (in most cases). Best regards. GermanJoe ( talk) 01:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miller v. United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Brennan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Natchitoches. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I read through Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. counties and didn't see anything about adding a link to the county sheriff's office (or the school board or county newspaper). That's why I deleted it stating per WP:ELMINOFFICIAL and WP:LINKFARM. Did I miss something? Thanks. Magnolia677 ( talk) 23:52, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, I understood why you deleted that link at first. I should have clarified it when I initially added it in. Battlesnake1 ( talk) 23:54, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply

If you understood why I deleted it, why did you add it back? The official county website is already on the article, and on that website is a link to the Sheriff's Office, see [3]. Please take a moment to read WP:ELMINOFFICIAL and WP:LINKFARM. Thank you again. Magnolia677 ( talk) 00:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC) reply

When you actually click on the Sheriff's Office link on the Pickens County website, the link redirects to a generic "Domain for sale" page. I found the working website on Google and put that link on the "External links" section of the article for the sake of convenience. I was saying that I should have clarified that the link on the Pickens County website was dead, hence the reason for putting the working link on the article.

Battlesnake1 ( talk) 00:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Azusa, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Target. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 1 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bunkerville, Nevada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clark County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Battlesnake1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

I wonder what you thought you were referring to when you said this? Factchecker_atyourservice 16:48, 11 March 2017 (UTC) reply

The "bias" part came from the part of your edit that read,"a homeowner who called to report an intruder was mistakenly shot dead by police." It's biased because the officers believed that they were actually getting shot at , while the family of the victim claimed that they had the wrong person. Also, the homeowner did not call the police to report the intruder. A silent burglar alarm was going off, so the police were already responding. In addition, the ex-wife also called 911 to report the intruder. The homeowner was busy chasing after the intruder because he was concerned about his mother. Battlesnake1 ( talk) 17:03, 11 March 2017 (UTC) reply

I was just trying to include a one sentence summary of what happened since the sequence of events was a little hard to figure out. Apologies for the mistakes, but I still don't see how you perceived them as bias. In favor of whom? Oh well, it doesn't really matter I guess. Factchecker_atyourservice 15:27, 12 March 2017 (UTC) reply

I think it's best if we put this matter behind us. Battlesnake1 ( talk) 16:27, 12 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, June 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loader. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:52, 25 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:FN-6 portable air defense missile weapon system MANPADS China Chinese army defense industry 640 002.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 00:30, 14 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, Battlesnake1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Fn-16-man-portable-air-defence-system.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B ( talk) 16:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:FN-6 portable air defense missile weapon system MANPADS China Chinese army defense industry 640 002.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B ( talk) 16:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Battlesnake1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hezbollah armed strength, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A " missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 06:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello Battlesnake1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged August 2017 Gardez Mosque Attack for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want August 2017 Gardez Mosque Attack to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello Battlesnake1,
Do NOT, please, archive "db.ukrcensus.gov.ua" pages — there are ".asp" pages "down the tree" and the "Wayback" doesn't archive the content of these pages.
 ☆☆☆—Pietadè ^Talk 08:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Neutralized Suspects in Ready Or Not.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Battlesnake1. Thank you for your work on Florida v. White. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited People's Defence Force (Myanmar), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ARTE. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC) reply