| This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Arnav_Bhate. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
In general, edits by abusive sockpuppets are broadly rolled back, unless there's an obvious reason not to that does not call on specialist knowledge.You are welcome to reinstate their good edits, keeping in mind that those edits then become your responsibility. WP:RBI applies to the edits made by the sockpuppet account, good edits by responsible editors are always welcome. Acroterion (talk) 13:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. Arnav Bhate ( talk) 13:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
List of Vande Bharat Express services is locked for past 4-5 days and hindering other editors to update the proposed services list and some useful edits in updating the launch order which is done wrong firstly in the 9 and 10th vb which is 10th one as 9th and 9th one as 10th and other services also. Pls kindly inform adminstrators to unlock page and best solution to ban the users involved in wrong activities Omalur Sharma ( talk) 03:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am not an administrator. Please contact them directly. Arnav Bhate ( talk) 07:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
he (jetstreamer) removed because no source I added source and a 340 pls don’t remove Wafer999 ( talk) 21:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Simpleflying is not a WP:RS. See WP:RSPSIMPLEFLYING. Arnav Bhate ( talk) 04:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Vande Bharat Express services for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Vande Bharat Express services until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.BhandupAamche ( talk) 13:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Arnav_Bhate, the data you put for A350-900s is wrong. Only 2 have been delivered to Air India. I don't think you can include it in the fleet if they are not delivered. Source: https://www.planespotters.net/airline/Air-India
even here you can see that they only put 2 A350-900s in "In Service" column and 4 A350-900s are in 'future' column. I hope that everything is clarified now, and that my edit was correct only. Please stop editing it wrong. Kokofruitkt ( talk) 11:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Airbus is more reliable than planespotters. If Airbus says they delivered 6 A350s then we say Air India got 6 A350s. The Airbus source is already in the article. Please see it.
Arnav Bhate (
talk) 15:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ahh yes, they are delivered yet have not started operations. For them, if they have painted the livery and tests are done, then they consider it as delivered. By that logic, there are many Air India's a320 neos, that are already in Toulousse, waiting for delivery. Should include them in the fleet too, according to your logic. Kokofruitkt ( talk) 02:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- And btw you can clearly see that the column where you are editing wrong, clearly says "in service". How is a plane in 'in service' if it's in Toulousse? The column doesn't say "total planes".
Kokofruitkt (
talk) 04:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Provide a source for that. As you can see
here, Airbus says AI is operating all 6 A350s that they have delivered.
Arnav Bhate (
talk) 06:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Show me their flight history from flight radar, if they are operating them. You should prove, since you are the one changing it. Bet you don't even know their registrations, so here they are :VT-JRE, VT-JRF, VT-JRH, VT-JRI. Show me their flight history. And like I said, you should also add the A320 neos which are not even delivered, according to your logic.
Kokofruitkt (
talk) 13:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- I do know their registrations. Also, where does the Airbus source say Air India is operating more than 41 A320neos? The latest report, in January says 38 and since then 3 more have been delivered. I have provided a source that says Air India is operating them, it is up to you to provide one that says Air India isn't. Also, we have included aircraft that planespotters says are parked in the in service tally.
Arnav Bhate (
talk) 03:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- You know what, keep editing it wrong, no one even trusts wikipedia lol, cuz it is an open source website, edited by people like you.
Kokofruitkt (
talk) 02:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- I only want a source that says Air India doesn't have them that would be more reliable than Airbus, while also being up-to-date, so I can put it in the article. Probably the only source that meets this is Air India itself.
Arnav Bhate (
talk) 06:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- You just want source, even if it says wrong. Airbus clearly has weong data, or I think they consider a plane delivered, once they are done with tests. But Air India hasn't taken the delivery of 4 aircrafts. Till now only VT-JRA and VT-JRB are delivered. You can even check Air India's twitter, their last post about A350, was their 2nd A350 which is A350. And yes they do tweet about all the new A350 deliveries. So if they all the 6 were delivered, then they would have tweeted about it. But till now only 2 A350s are delivered according to their twitter.
- x.com/airindia/status/1753780106651443299?s=20
Kokofruitkt (
talk) 08:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- I see another user has added a source. That source seems fine so I will let it be. Arnav Bhate ( talk) 07:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- I only want a source that says Air India doesn't have them that would be more reliable than Airbus, while also being up-to-date, so I can put it in the article. Probably the only source that meets this is Air India itself.
Arnav Bhate (
talk) 06:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- You know what, keep editing it wrong, no one even trusts wikipedia lol, cuz it is an open source website, edited by people like you.
Kokofruitkt (
talk) 02:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- I do know their registrations. Also, where does the Airbus source say Air India is operating more than 41 A320neos? The latest report, in January says 38 and since then 3 more have been delivered. I have provided a source that says Air India is operating them, it is up to you to provide one that says Air India isn't. Also, we have included aircraft that planespotters says are parked in the in service tally.
Arnav Bhate (
talk) 03:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Show me their flight history from flight radar, if they are operating them. You should prove, since you are the one changing it. Bet you don't even know their registrations, so here they are :VT-JRE, VT-JRF, VT-JRH, VT-JRI. Show me their flight history. And like I said, you should also add the A320 neos which are not even delivered, according to your logic.
Kokofruitkt (
talk) 13:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Provide a source for that. As you can see
here, Airbus says AI is operating all 6 A350s that they have delivered.
Arnav Bhate (
talk) 06:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
You undid my edit of the Indian Railways electrification stat tables in Central Organisation for Railway Electrification claiming that it "Does not do anything". What it does is exclude the summary line from sorting. Without it, if you click on any of the column headers to sort according to that column, the sum will also be considered, which produces odd results if you click the first column (State resp. Zone in alphabetic order) or the last column (where the percentage for the total is the weighed mean of the states/zones and thus will be somewhere in the middle). Even for the other two columns, it's still weird to have the sum on top when you set the table in descending order.
So I reverted your revert, but I posted a more detailed explanation here. Rontombontom ( talk) 13:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)