The reason I removed the image is that, while Wikipedia does encourage use of images, it doesn't tend to support the use of screenshots/film images of the actor on the biography page. They are generally used on the pages for the film itself. The only time that a screenshot/film image would be appropriate would be if it is used to illustrate some particular point that the image uniquely reflects or better clarifies. Offhand, the example that comes to mind might be in an article about Robert De Niro, if the section discussed his willingness to gain weight for his role in Raging Bull, but only if it covered something pertinent in the image. You don't often see a film image in the articles that carry a featured or good article status, and Fonda's is a good article. Hopefully, that answers your question. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 08:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
I don't mean to intrude- but I added several of the images you've mentioned, and most of them are free of copyright which completely changes their suitability. All of the images in Judy Garland are free images from theatrical trailers that are not subject to copyright. Most of the images in Bette Davis and Vivien Leigh are the same - not subject to copyright and carefully chosen for that reason. At least a couple of the images at Sharon Tate are free and the ones that are not free are accompanied by discussion of the specific role/film. I can't comment on Diane Keaton as I have not added those images. As Jane Fonda is a more recent performer it would be difficult to find film images that have fallen into public domain whereas the films of Davis, Leigh and Garland predate the copyrighting of film trailers which was only widely introduced in 1963. If you click on any of the images in any of these articles you'll see which ones are free and which ones are not. Hope this helps. Rossrs ( talk) 14:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Those images were all missing some vital information. For example, File:ARB-Alva-Myrdal.jpg and File:Irène Joliot-Curie.jpg have no author, while others have improper licensing. -- Scorpion 0422 21:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi. For some reason your restoration of the "Flight 11" section in Hijackers in the September 11 attacks appeared to me to be its removal. Sorry about that. I reversed my edit as soon as I noticed - just explaining that it was an accident in case you were wondering what was going on. Euryalus ( talk) 09:47, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Amsaim ( talk) 22:17, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your addition to Chitty Chitty Death Bang. Cirt ( talk) 17:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Ukraine Barnstar | ||
I give you this Ukraine Barnstar for improving the article
Mila Kunis the past months!
A lot of small edits are just as important as writing new lengthy articles! — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 15:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC) |
For the record, if you see something like that again, yes, please do delete it. Thanks for helping keep an eye out for that stuff. Happy editing! Millahnna (mouse) talk 19:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Aquila89. I do not get the following statement by you on the Megan Fox article: "breakout role is not related to breakout character."
I ask, "How so?" Breakout character and breakout role are synonymous with each other. They are used interchangeably all the time, and mean the same thing in every context. This is why I reverted you on this matter. I mean, how is the word "role" different than "character" in this case? Flyer22 ( talk) 01:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
I didn't revert anything from you. Fighting for Justice ( talk) 05:15, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Great job on all the months effort you've put into List of accolades received by Black Swan. After doing some of my (still ongoing) edits, I think this list meets the FL criteria. Would you like for you, User:Bruce Campbell (and big contributor) and me to nominate it at FLC together? Crystal Clear x3 09:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me completing the missing information in the article List of Mad's movie spoofs. Thanks to you this article finally is really close to perfection now (the only things missing now is the information about the writers of the '50s movie spoofs). There is still the List of Mad's TV shows spoofs article which also needs to completed. I would really appreciate any help you can offer. TheCuriousGnome ( talk) 21:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining
WikiProject Film? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the
list of participants. We also have a number of
regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Erik ( talk | contribs) 12:18, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
Please don't strike my concerns at
Talk:Mila Kunis/GA1. I will strike them as I feel they have been resolved.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR) 13:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
"They've been seen together, but neither made an official statement about it, so I don't think we should include this. Wikipedia is not a gossip magazine. Also, it's only have been a few months, it's not notable enough yet to be included in her biography."
Hey Aquila89; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 22:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Walter White (Breaking Bad)#Real life meth dealer named Walter White. Chunk5Darth ( talk) 12:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mila Kunis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:31, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Congo Free State may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:13, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Aquila89 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
You're not blocked, however you have recently tried to edit from an IP address that's blocked as a web host provider. PhilKnight ( talk) 15:22, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you are using a corporate internet connection, switch to a different Wi-Fi network. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in.
If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption.
{{
unblock|reason=Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}
. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined
here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the
unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host.Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and they should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.
PhilKnight ( talk) 20:52, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Aquila89 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Requesting an IP address block exemption, because I think my IP address was blocked because of "collateral damage", I am not using a webhost. Aquila89 ( talk) 20:13, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline as we humble admins can't just up and grant it anymore. You need to go to WP:IPBE and follow the process there to use the OTRS. — Daniel Case ( talk) 02:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Kristen Stewart does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Chamith (talk) 10:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Aquila89. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
It's an 80 year old book and this isn't the first time it's been politically relevant. I remember it hat an uptick of popularity when W passed the Patriot Act. However, you make a compelling point. If you want to revert my revert, I won't stop you. Czolgolz ( talk) 03:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Aquila89. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Aquila89. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Aquila89. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Citation Barnstar | |
Thanks for all of your work completing and formatting citations! Marquardtika ( talk) 14:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Cornyn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trinity University. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The New York Times Book Review, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Carey.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:10, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary-Claire King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benjamin Franklin Medal.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:33, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello. As I've seen you changing reference formats on several occasions, I presume you are unaware of WP:CITEVAR, which basically says you should not change the established format of references in an article. Cheers, Number 5 7 19:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gideon Sa'ar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Election Committee.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Fall of Kabul (2021) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Tyrone Madera ( talk) 20:43, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Book Award for Nonfiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blood in the Water.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your contribution to Eric Zemmour, in particular, your improvements to the Le Figaro citation. Unfortunately, I had to remove the YouTube video, though, because it is a WP:PRIMARY source, and Wikipedia prefers WP:SECONDARY sources when available. In this case, secondary news sources about Zemmour's declaration of candidacy are plentiful. Since there was already a highly reliable source in the article (the Figaro citation) nothing else is needed there. If you can find a copy of the video captioned in English, you could try adding it to the "External links" section; but as primary material entirely in a foreign language, it's unsuitable for use as a citation in the article. Thanks again for your contribution, and happy editing! Mathglot ( talk) 19:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Online Film Critics Society Award for Best Actor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hidetoshi Nishijima.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tomás Diez Acosta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cuban.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Aquila89! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Trumpism that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. – S. Rich ( talk) 21:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Los Angeles Times Book Prize for Science and Technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Endless Forms Most Beautiful.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:27, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
I see that in this edit, you replaced a wikilink to a redirect page with a piped link directly to the page that was redirected to. I understand that instinct, but Wikipedia standard is that we actually prefer that simple link to a redirect page. You can see this preference discussed at WP:NOTBROKEN. As such, I request that you undo that edit. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 00:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, could you help me improve this English in this article Kevin Peraza https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Peraza — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.219.223.137 ( talk) 19:16, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Hey, can you lock an Wikipedia article about a Pakistani senator who justifying holocaust so that some random unregistered Pakistani bot can't edit it, they are trying really hard to protect their own senator from bad publication even though that senator is justifying holocaust Spartan Alpha ( talk) 13:25, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)