|
||
Is an MSNBC produced short documentary not a notable work? Wikipedia lists MSNBC as a 'generally reliable source'.
Section removed: In 2022, Harvard Law Lecturer, Rebecca Richman Cohen, produced a short documentary entitled THE RECALL: REFRAMED exploring the unintended consequences of the recall of Judge Aaron Persky which came at the height of the #MeToo movement in 2018. The film used the Turner case to critique the knee-jerk demand for harsh sentences to address sexual violence – a demand that disproportionately impacts low-income and people of color. It asks how we might imagine better ways of addressing sexual violence, opening the door to conversations about restorative and transformative justice, and truly supporting survivors. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.43.106.63 ( talk) 16:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Black Kite (talk) 22:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
65.50.136.45 will answer your questions you asked on Opportunity (rover) 1. What is Oppy? Well, Oppy is the nickname for the Opportunity rover. "Opportunity, also known as MER-B (Mars Exploration Rover – B) or MER-1, and nicknamed Oppy,[8] is a robotic rover that was active on Mars from 2004 until mid-2018."
The Unsourced part of the timeline diverts from an earlier edit made by me. Then, it got deleted. I revised the part and put it back, but I must forgotten the resources.
Sincerely, 65.50.136.45 ( talk) 19:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
But Arthur, malediction sucks so hard, Bkatcher. It sucks so hard. Stvincent1999 ( talk) 18:48, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 06:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
I have no issue with your explanation in reverting my edit, but why is the last American veteran listed then? Juve2000 ( talk) 16:50, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Bkatcher. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:53, 9 December 2022 (UTC) |
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Bkatcher! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:05, 9 December 2022 (UTC) |
The undue edit you did was incorrect. concurrent is the correct word — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:805:8600:4DB0:21C5:F12B:371:6C23 ( talk) 05:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
I thought that since Bush was only the second Vice-President to live at the residence after Walter Mondale and since he was elected as President that I could be listed as a fact. [1] I also assumed that since the source I provided in the article included this picture of Bush living at the residence after his victory that it provided that fact.
-- And1987 ( talk) 04:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Reverend Mr. Black until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk) 21:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
You commented it was "non notable." What makes a contribution to that page "notable"? It was from a work of fiction, as they all are, and I cited my source. RoboticFisherman ( talk) 22:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Should we include the fact that she was the first First Lady to appear on Sesame Street or is it not that important? [3] And1987 ( talk) 18:08, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi
You reverted me on Iraq War. Please take a look at /info/en/?search=Template_talk:Infobox_military_conflict#RfC_on_%22supported_by%22_being_used_with_the_belligerent_parameter
The "supported by" bits should be removed and not restored unless a consensus is established to do so. 37.245.43.126 ( talk) 04:36, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your idiotic slash-and-burn editing of the "Violet (Peanuts)" article. No, this is not polite; your deplorable action doesn't deserve such civility. 2601:545:8201:6290:48AA:2B62:7D5D:C14B ( talk) 13:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day, Bkatcher, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Ezra Cricket ( talk) 01:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
I thought you said, no resumes, right? Well, suit yourself. I beg your pardon, I'm sure. It was done by wherever I put in the U.S. delegations at the Closing Ceremony, PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympics. Thanks, anyway. 108.21.67.83 ( talk) 04:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Just a heads up, I have reverted your edit, and changed the spelling of "cold" to "gold", as i meant white gold, and not cold 108.49.72.125 ( talk) 23:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.I.D. Investigators until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.