Sir/Mam! I request you to please visit the Maruti Suzuki Arena & Nexa Website. All the vehicle lineup of Maruti Suzuki is now built on HEARTECT platform except Celerio which is still on old Platform. YSSR1865 ( talk) 06:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Haa!! Sorry for Mentioning all! Existing Alto800 & Eeco were based on old Platform itslef and same goes with Celerio. But Maruti Suzuki itself mentioned in the OFFICIAL WEBSITE that Vitara Brezza, S-Cross, Ciaz, Baleno, Ignis, XL6, Ertiga, Swift/Dzire are based on HEARTECT architecture! YSSR1865 ( talk) 07:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Check MS Arena Website! and Nexa Website! and I deny the link that you've mentioned (team bhp) one is just being doubtful and there's no answer there. and official website itself is saying that S Cross & all lineup in NEXA based on TECT architecture (HEARTECT). I request you to recheck. I'm 100% sure about that. 07:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
1) Suzuki Vitara Brezza https://www.marutisuzuki.com/vitara-brezza check the words under "safety to be wicked" title. 2) Suzuki S-Cross https://www.nexaexperience.com/s-cross/safety#element_submenu 3) Suzuki Ciaz https://www.nexaexperience.com/ciaz/safety#element_submenu
and this information is from official website. not any secondary websites like you've mentioned. And i deny your links because they're old. YSSR1865 ( talk) 19 January 2021
I deny that because TECT is NOT the same as HEARTECT. They are two different things. TECT is not a platform, rather a marketing term of vehicle structure. Andra Febrian ( talk) 10:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gu5YPzRqq8E
Crash Test Dummies NOT driving big bus yet!
NO! No driving big bus yet, this one first, go-cart first! 2001:E68:5432:9790:2431:C54C:BC94:29F7 ( talk) 09:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, you recently reverted a edit by 2A02:A319:403B:1B80:61C7:BF81:8C9D:2488 ( talk · contribs). I came across them too, adding text or just 'odd' sources. I looked at several of the 'news' sources, and they look rather bloggy, WordPress style sites.
The oddest thing is ALL the 'stories' were written by "Adam". Looks like someone is trying to promote their own substandard sites. I've reverted several of their edits myself. Just FYI.
Regards,
220
of
ßorg 12:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Could you please differentiate between these two? Again I request you to recheck the website of NEXA. You're just being like a fan of Suzuki. I already said you to check the website of NEXA. If TECT isn't same as HEARTECT. Then Why did MS mention BALENO & S-Presso (includes S-Cross too) under TECT architecture?? huh. Why're you just covering the truth?? huh. YSSR1865 ( talk) 07:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
And Remember these are MONOCOQUES..not Ladderframes to be two parts(body & platform) YSSR1865 ( talk) 07:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
HEARTECT cars could have TECT, and non-HEARTECT cars also could have TECT. Those are separate things. TECT is not HEARTECT and vice versa. Andra Febrian ( talk) 07:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
My apologies, I was too quick to revert your helpful removal on the sales information section from Isuzu D-Max. I've now undone my reversion to your latest version :) Jonathan Deamer ( talk) 08:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Mazda CX-8 is NOT anyhow related with Mazda CX-9. CX-8 is simply elongated version of CX-5. The CX-8 and CX-9 are build on two different platforms. CX-5 and CX-8 are of the same width. CX-9 width is 13 cm bigger, which in term of width is A LOT, and by far the most indicative the vehicles are not related. Why am I telling you that? Because once the width of a car is defined it is almost impossible to change, whereas length is easy to manipulate, weather by lengthening the wheelbase or by increasing the overhangs with different bodyworks. Maybe they look alike, but so do today's Mercedes C-, E- and S-class and I bet you will not say they are just a different versions of the same car. So, please revert your changes, because they are wrong. [1] Zvrkljati ( talk) 13:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Automotive industry in Brazil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevrolet Joy.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kia Optima, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hwaseong.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nissan Livina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hòa Bình.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | |
Thank you for explaining and helping the Toyota Concept Vehicles article. DestinationFearFan ( talk) 16:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
What is your rationale for the changes you made to this article? It seems to me that the original was more descriptive. My Gussie ( talk) 17:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Wow, my first impersonator! Thanks. Mr.choppers | ✎ 14:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
There’s no single test of corporate nationality. Let’s stick to information released by the company itself -> Polestar is jointly owned by Geely and Volvo, making it a Sino-Swedish company.
See: http://zgh.com/our-brands/polestar/?lang=en
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiddo ( talk • contribs) 11:57, April 26, 2021 (UTC)
I think that full model change is more important than facelift in vehicle manufacturing? But There is just facelift article in wikipedia.
I think japanese model change article is very informative. This article explains the difference full model change and minor model change and facelift
Please use translator and check out below article
Facelift article has just 7 lines and very insufficient
What do you think of expanding of facelift article like japanese article?
Can you help me? Footwiks ( talk) 16:26, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Volkswagen Jetta (A6), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chakan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not sure whether this is enough to prove it seeing as there is a Livina badge on the back of the car but Nissan Malaysia's marketing seems to only ever refer to the model as the Nissan X-Gear, not the Nissan Livina X-Gear:
KA467 ( talk) 19:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello there, I see you have reverted my edits on the Toyota Mark X page. I will admit my edits were leaning towards personal preference, which is not acceptable. However, the Toyota Mark X, despite its presence in the grey market, is not an international product. Therefore, I felt American English was correct. If you review my sources, you will see there are many inconsistencies about Japan-related topics on this website. CarCrazedAlex586 ( talk) 15:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello Andra, an editor opened a new discussion at the talkpage of the Honda Mobilio article, you may consider checking it out. Thanks! VictorTorres2002 ( talk) 05:49, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chevrolet Aveo (T200), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ravon.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Small car shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Still you have not started a discussion but you did start editwarring
The Banner
talk 16:17, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
And if you ask again what the problem is: take it to the talk page first to properly discuss your change. The Banner talk 16:26, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop reverting my edits of Crossover SUV what is wrong with the edits I am making. Also, a sedan isn't a Crossover either. And lastly, in Full-size Crossover you are also reverting my changes. And anyway why do u care so much about the Flex being head image??? I see you are edit warring on Small car. Please stop edit warring me and read my explanations. Take it to the talk page. Just stop reverting with an unreasonable explanation. And furthermore, I was the one who improved Crossover. Adding missing segments and starting the galleries. Did, you start the galleries? Best, 2007DodgeRam ( talk) 21:43, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
No that is not me sockpuppeting. He is some Texas Ip. I live in Az. And furthermore , we need more examples in the Full-size crossover segment. I get that there are very few of those but we need examples. Just because you are the number 1 contributed to the article doesn’t mean the article is yours so stop bossing me around. You have no more rights on this sight than me. Please just stop being bossy like you own the article. I’ll make it to #1 contributor of the article in no time at all 2007DodgeRam ( talk) 04:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
I’ll give you examples: Ford freestyle Ford Taurus X Lincoln MKT Buick Enclave 2007DodgeRam ( talk) 17:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
MKT: https://www.cars.com/research/lincoln-mkt-2016/ 2007DodgeRam ( talk) 17:26, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
As for enclave it was full size until 2017 2007DodgeRam ( talk) 17:26, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Hey there,
Seems like you've deleted some information about the Hyundai N1/N2 Platforms here.
Although this information is unsourced, it seems to be mostly correct, from what I can tell.
It would be better to find sources for this information and correct errors, rather than wipe the whole section out.
Hi User:Andra Febrian: I am a Rivian employee hoping to improve our article. Some information is new, and some is old and needs updating. Because I am in a COI relationship, I am reaching out to see if you would consider it a good use of your time to take a look at my proposed edits. I noticed you have an interest in automobile articles, and was wondering if you might want to work on improving this page as well. It is always my intention to work within the Wikipedia rules. Currently, on the Rivian talk page I have a proposal regarding updates to our facilities section, and a second one with info box updates. All accompanying sources are formatted. I look forward to your feedback, and appreciate your time. Best IanRivian ( talk) 22:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peugeot 206, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peugeot Hoggar.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
It appears that you are intent on undoing my contributions to the article. This is disheartening, and appears to be approaching edit warring. I would appreciate if you would consider that my edits are made in wp:good faith, and try to find a way to collaborate rather than undo my contributions. In the meantime, I will ask user The Banner talk to review the recent edits and keep an eye on the situation. 842U ( talk) 10:42, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Andra, I see that you have made a lot of edits to BMW X2. Another editor is absolutely opposed to the inclusion of metric hp (aka PS) and is removing this unit from all BMW articles. Not sure if you have an opinion but I welcome you to check things out. Thanks, Mr.choppers | ✎ 01:44, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
STOP; the Chevrolet Spin is GMB,worked there as engineer for years, stop . Indonesia is second row
My edit was not vandalism I'm love abc ( talk) 01:42, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Sorry
Hi Andra, just passing by because I saw you were undoing my work (07/12/21) on the HR engine page (I was in anon), you specificaly deleted the HR18, HR12 and HR15 thread. And I just wanted to know why? as the info are correct but not complete obviously since engines are not out yet. TY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex57290 ( talk • contribs) 16:10, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of production battery electric vehicles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:54, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Andra, I was trying to make some minor copyedits to id:Opel Blazer/Chevrolet Blazer S-10 and some sort of automatic filter blocked my edits as vandalism. I tried to ask for help elsewhere, but I cannot make a single edit anywhere. Do you think you would be able to help figure this out? I am not using a VPN or anything. Best, Mr.choppers | ✎ 14:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Halo. Saya mencoba membuat perbaikan tata letak kecil ke Opel Blazer/Chevrolet Blazer S-10. Ada filter yang tidak mengizinkan saya melakukan pengeditan. Apakah Anda tahu bagaimana saya bisa memperbaikinya? Terima kasih.
Hey- I'm sorry for editing your article so much and reverting your article. I just wanted to make the article more accessible for the information that was being seeked, but now I saw the other links and your credibility, so I figured you knew what you were doing. Sorry again. -Dr. Moist Vanilla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Moist Vanilla ( talk • contribs) 02:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited B-segment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
My point that I was trying to make came from a reliable source and the EPA classified the Maxima in the same league as the Altima, even while having smaller interior and luggage capacity. It is odd how it's classified full-size by Wikipedia. Every time people try changing it to midsize it is back to full-size within one month. Even its exterior dimensions are smaller than that of the Altima's. Midsize is more realistic, though I would omit the classification altogether. It's more VW Arteon or Kia Stinger than a full-size sedan like an Avalon or an Impala. 71.94.157.155 ( talk) 05:36, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Why are you removing my edit without any valuable proof behind this? I've mentioned couple of times VW Sharan is still produced and available to buy in plenty of European countries, production clearly hasn't stopped in 2020 because you're still able to order a new one 2 years after this alleged date of cessation. Here you are, Germany [1], Poland [2], Czech Republic [3]. And you're simply reverting my edit just because. Sorry bro, this is vandalism, hope you won't do this again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.64.96.29 ( talk) 07:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
I provided retroactive attribution in this diff for the content you merged from Audi India; just be sure to note it in the edit summary for future merges. Thanks! DanCherek ( talk) 18:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Do not repeatedly engage in deliberate, malicious vandalism of BYD e2 and Dolphin hatchback. It is not notable to you but it is notable to others. Please take into account the viewpoint of others. Fiextqbe ( talk) 17:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey! I noticed you did a partial revert of my edit to Chrysler PT Cruiser. I assumed that the British term was the one used throughout the article (and also the user's username who I was reverting seemed like they were WP:NOTHERE but I'm AGF for now) so that was why I had changed it to be the British term. Looking at it now, that appears to have been the only instance of the British term on the article. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:34, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Renault Austral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hybrid.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
None are variants CornyTheEditor ( talk) 10:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Toyota Gazoo Racing logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Smart 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WLTP.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
I've started a discussion at AN/I regarding the disruptive editor that you and I have been cleaning up after on List of Ford vehicles and numerous other articles. If you have any details to add, the thread is here. -- Sable232 ( talk) 21:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello Andra. Just a question, are you editing while logged out and using the "101.128.126.242" IP address in editing vehicle-related articles? I'm sure that's against Wikipedia policies so I'm just letting you know about it. Thanks! VictorTorres2002 ( talk) 09:12, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of production battery electric vehicles, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of production battery electric vehicles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to discuss about the existing red links on Renault template (or any other template related to automotive industry), I suggest you to discuss on the template's talk page. I'm not sure if you have read the Red link article, but it states that:
“ | "Avoiding creation of certain types of red links (title);
Do not create red links to: Articles that are unlikely to be created and retained on Wikipedia.... "Red links may be used in navboxes which also contain links to existing articles, but they cannot be excessive. Editors who add red links to navboxes are expected to actively work on building those articles, or the links may be removed from the template. |
” |
Therefore If you are going to create (or are working on) the articles in red links, just go ahead and restore them on the template. Otherwise, your reversions are disruptive so you would restore unuseless links.
If you disagree with me or want to debate this, you're welcome to open a discussion on Template_talk:Renault. Thanks. Fma12 ( talk) 09:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Andra Febrian
Thank you for creating Peugeot 408 (crossover).
User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi @ Andra Febrian: The page was reviewed as part of the WP:NPP page review. The article is effectively unsourced and is directory-like. Its not ideal as a disambiguation page either. scope_creep Talk 09:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
No, no agenda at all. I just try to craft pages the way in which I think is best. While I feel the "warning" is a bit ridiculous, I'll cede this and just move on. You can't win them all. Rjohnson1980 ( talk) 20:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
When you reverted this edit on Baojun 510, you also reverted a wrong wikilink that I had disabled ( Chevrolet Groove, is a different model so it is an electric vehicle not related to the rebadged "Chevrolet Groove" commercialised in Latin America. That's the reason why I had also added a tag to avoid confusions.
So I'm going to fix that. And please, try to check what other users editions consist of before reverting impulsively. Thanks. Fma12 ( talk) 10:51, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Why revert the changes?! My edit was not spammy or destructive.
The car has a new model and all-new look. It should be the highlighted image not the old looking model. 89.147.0.201 ( talk) 08:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Ford Escape (first generation), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff) 14:28, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for that revert. I think I got carried away. I'm still trying to work out what some of these terms are in Australian English. So what are "mid-forward wings" I google it and all I get is the Honda Accord. St Anselm ( talk) 15:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:FAW Toyota logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on MG Marvel R requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PK650 ( talk) 06:01, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Draft:Ford Escape (first generation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Moved to main namespace
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AudiGuy-1204 ( talk) 21:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello WP:NAVIMAGES is just an essay. I have reverted your deletion of an image in the Mazda template. Bruxton ( talk) 02:26, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I would argue that it provides an insight into how the native name of the car is pronounced. To remove it seems pointless to me. Sprucecopse ( talk) 13:41, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Andra Febrian,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
VictorTorres2002 (
talk) 03:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
VictorTorres2002 ( talk) 03:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Andra Febrian. Thank you for your work on Suzuki Fronx. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Andra Febrian. Thank you for your work on Acura Integra (DE). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello! Thanks for writing this article. I encourage and hope you will write more! Have a good day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:38, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Andra. You deleted my All New Ayla, Innova Zenix image and "Suzuki Neo Baleno" part of Suzuki SX4. why did you deleted it? please respond. Thank You. Davin1011 ( talk) 15:36, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Andra, just asking, why did you revert the image I added on Mercedes-Benz GLC? Fukswityu ( talk) 11:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanna know why did you delete the vehicle segment description in the article of
Chery? for example Chery Tiggo 8 — Mid-size CUV.
Is this some kind of convention? Infinty 0 ( talk) 01:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Andra, yet another IP is off swapping pictures of BMW 3-series. Would you mind checking in at BMW 3 Series (E36) and BMW 3 Series Compact from time to time? Best, Mr.choppers | ✎ 17:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Andra Febrian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " Ford Escape".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Omoda, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 17:41, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Andra Febrian Have you ever been uploaded Japanese "Mitsubishi Motors Vehicle Lineup General Catalog 1997 Volume 2" brochure to Internet Archive (archive.org)? Yuliadhi ( talk) 23:58, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi - I was reverting a sock of an LTA - if you've checked the edit and stand by the changes,then no worries with reinstating Girth Summit (blether) 10:44, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Volkswagen Virtus, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 15:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Volkswagen Virtus, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 15:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Does related have any special meaning? I didn't think it was disputed that one of the models made before the model 3, just like the model y, is a "related" model to the model 3. At any rate I reverted that <removal>, and ignored the summary, both because I thought it made no sense and because it was done by an LTA's IP.
If related has any special meaning then forgive my ignorance. – 2804:F14:80B3:CB01:D427:B819:5DC8:2330 ( talk) 12:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Your edit to Toyota Vitz has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa ( talk) 18:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Hey Editor, I edit here too bearing the username TheProEditor11. I noticed that an edit made by me on Honda Amaze was reverted by you. You reverted the edit for some baseless reasons since my edit was really correct and valid. The edit was also not my opinion but a statement which rely on citation. I also even own Honda Amaze VX and hence know about changes. I am also a good follower of Honda Cars. I would like to request you don't revert edits for baseless reasons as editing on Wikipedia is a very serious task. If you even think that I am wrong then prove me how my edit was wrong Sir. I am a good listener! Pardon me for any mistake -_-
Have a good day editor! :) - TheProEditor11 ( talk) 06:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
FYI, when you added this message [1] to WT:CARS, you forgot your signature. The missing timestamp has caused the auto-archival bot to keep missing the notice, leaving it at the top of the talk page for the last 2 years. I've added a {{ unsigned}} to correct the issue for you. -- 67.70.25.80 ( talk) 00:38, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi - would you like to explain your edit summary in your recent revert at Mitsubishi Lancer? Girth Summit (blether) 15:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello Andra Febrian, before you say anything to the admins, as you already know who I am, there's just a couple of things I'd like to say, if you don't mind.. MrDavrSock ( talk) 06:41, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Baojun RM-5, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 08:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Please add more pics as there are now other colours that have been spotted (Silver, Yellow, Grey, White). Theres also some info regarding a Long range variant being added as a third trim to the line up in China.
Also prices have been mentioned in China for all trims. LeeBanj ( talk) 12:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
https://i0.wp.com/evmagz.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/MG-Cyberster-Price.jpg?resize=1024%2C254&ssl=1 — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
LeeBanj (
talk •
contribs) 13:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Andra Febrian. Thank you for your work on Lexus TX. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello! I trust you're enjoying a wonderful day. I wanted to express my gratitude for your valuable contribution to Wikipedia through your article. I'm pleased to let you know that your article fully complies with Wikipedia's guidelines, so I've officially marked it as reviewed. Wishing you and your loved ones a fantastic day ahead!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:35, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, can I ask you a question? Last time I put BYD Yuan Plus images (the China version of Atto 3) into BYD Atto 3 article, but you rejected it because "it's the same car". Why don't you do the same thing for BYD Dolphin? Guyrichtheman ( talk) 12:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Last time I added all the sources in many article but you and Sable232 rejected them because "It is a vandal". Why don't you do the same thing for car articles. 122.164.83.39 ( talk) 05:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, just asking
On the Lexus LBX article in the table, why did you add unannounced, but hide the power/torque figures? Just asking QuattrostagioniIV ( talk) 11:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
I have to be pretty honest, the mk3 is an ugly car. Does not represent the micra well. Psyfly2 ( talk) 10:57, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
I wonder why doing the math for sizes and dimensions of vehicles put out by manufactures and comparing them by doing math is considered original research when saying it is the smallest Volvo ever made forgetting about S60 sedan Volvo which is smaller. The dimension are sourced from the Volvo website and materials put out by Honda for accord size. Also the article reads like an advertisement which is also not advised under wikipedia rules. The point of a wikipedia article is not to sell stuff but to provided useful information at a glance and if that is by providing information that contradict the official word of companies then that should be what happens. Rabbipika ( talk) 14:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Honda Elevate, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 08:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Toyota bZ3, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 16:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mazda CX-50, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 16:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
"Marque" is just a synonymous of "brand" when talking of cars in British English, especially in England. It isn't at all a grandiose term. The Smart article move can be supported anyways by the fact the article seems to be written in American English (mostly). Urbanoc ( talk) 09:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
I have noticed your extensive revisions to articles on various car brands, changing 'marque' to 'brand.'
These moves were made without discussion and appears unprofessional. Before making such widespread changes in the future, please carefully consult the relevant sources (in this case, I suggest referring to several major English dictionaries, like Oxford or Collins) for proper justification. Infinty 0 ( talk) 10:52, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no need to edit every vehicle page and add their model codes to the generation Infoboxes as they're already added to the anchor/drop tab at the top (example, Crown: (Fifteenth generation (S220; 2018))). It's pointless to add them where they aren't needed. So, discontinue making such edits. It's just a waste of time, and a pain to undo them individually. Antares600 ( talk) 20:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Andra, partly related to the above, I have started a discussion at AN/I regarding Antares600's disruptive editing. The thread is here if you have any input. -- Sable232 ( talk) 23:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ford Explorer EV, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 06:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ford Explorer EV, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 15:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited SEAT Ateca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cupra.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
That IP's other edit was to replace a good image with a bad one from one of his favorite uploaders on an article that's long been a favorite target of his. While the IP geolocates to the other end of Java, I don't see how it ccould be anyone else. That said, I'm not going to re-revert, if you think the addition is accurate and constructive. -- Sable232 ( talk) 16:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Andra Febrian. Thank you for your work on Fangchengbao. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 18:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello Andra Febrian!
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Harmony Intelligent Mobility Alliance logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
You have reverted my change compact suv from subcompact. class based on wheelbase. i suggest you to search. also xv is high version of impreza. how can be xv subcompact suv while impreza compact. thank you.in your idea cupra formemtor, corolla cross compact but xv crostrek is similar yaris cross. not evem imposibble. Skyside ( talk) 20:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, can you translate GAC Aion into Indonesian Wikipedia? Thanks. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 13:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
I'm at a loss to understand why you chose to edit out important ...and verified info from the Isuzu Vehicross wiki page. You have removed both USA domestic AND Japanese JDM production number charts...with the associated exterior/interior trim and color info.
This is ALL verified info..which you claim is unsourced in your edit notes.
Why didnt YOU verify first...what makes you change info like this without checking FIRST ??
IF you want to verify this info..or ANY info regarding the Isuzu Vehicross I suggest you join the very active and knowledgeable Facebook Vehicross group :-
https://www.facebook.com/groups/32929439606
In the meantime..Please undo all your edits right away. Thank you. JoFotoz ( talk) 02:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)