Isn't it standard procedure to put Template:Delrev on the deleted/deletable page as described by WP:DRV instructions? I found the edit summary a bit derogatory. Are image discussions and actions supposed to be inherently rude? Aditya( talk • contribs) 01:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. I put the article on my watch list and will take care of it if it happens again. If I'm not around, you can report it to WP:AIV, since the IP has received a final warning. Cheers.-- Kubigula ( talk) 15:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Please point to the particular scene, line, or critical commentary which says that a particular catsuit was made of lycra, leather, pleather, or whatever. Corvus cornix talk 06:19, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
If you don't like the material (leather/latex/vinyl) to be there without a citation, then remove them I thought about that but figured I'd get reverted. Corvus cornix talk 17:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
I'll give you Social aspects of clothing and to a lesser extent Voyeurism (though I highly disagree with this one as well), but how do you explain Wedgie, Whale tail, Downblouse and Upskirt, when none of these subjects involve a "defect" in an article of clothing or accidental exposure of one's body part? These all imply either a deliberate exposure or simply the visual effect of an article of clothing - not a result in an exposure due to a defect. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 08:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
It would be better if you could discuss and go through the concerned article's history ( [1]) before making such edits. Thanks -- Nosedown ( talk) 23:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
My political affiliations, grudges etc are not relenvant here, it's just a matter of simple english reading skills:
this is what the sentence reads:
"It also encompasses the 562 protected princely states that became integral parts of the Union of India, but was not directly ruled by the Raj,[5] including Hyderabad State, Kingdom of Mysore, State of Jammu and Kashmir, Baroda, and Gwalior.[6] Sikkim joined India in 1975"
The sentence is constructed (assuming good faith) so as to imply that Jammu and kashmir is an integral part of India along with the other mentioned states, this is obviously not true, so the sentence needs to be correctly rephrased. Khokhar ( talk) 21:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments on my talk page, I would be happy to lend a hand, but I am not always very active so will try to help whenever possible. Regards. Khokhar ( talk) 19:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Aditya Kabir. I have tried to revert the above-captioned article to the last clean version. I may have inadvertently taken out this edit of yours. Please feel free to restore that edit if I did indeed err. Thanks! — Spike Toronto 07:00, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
I have somewhat enhanced the article Illegal immigration in India. Please review and comment on the talk page if the NPOV banner can be removed.
Thanks -- Iball ( talk) 16:35, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
Yes, you are right an A-Class should be decided by the relevant wikiproject. I was wondering how did the members of your project go about this and reached the decision for this article Talk:Shahbag to pass it as an A-Class article? I cannot see any discussions about this. Mootros ( talk) 09:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
The problem is I have a 15 page honors thesis to write between now and May 5th, and then I have finals. I am technically supposed to be on wikibreak these days. I can't really be of much use until after 5/15, but it is quite clear that they are on the road to getting banned. Thegreyanomaly ( talk) 02:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Quigley seems to want to start a discussion on the inclusion of Tibet in South Asia. Please chime in if you can. You are being informed of this as you took part in similar discussions on Talk:South Asia in the past. Thegreyanomaly ( talk) 08:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Aditya Kabir, I have not forgotten about helping with the B. vulgaris article. I am currently working on a large list of disambiguations and when I am finished will take another look at it. It does need some work, but can see you have striven mightily to be thorough. As for rating it a "B", I would leave that to members of WikiProject Plants, although there is no prohibition from you rating it yourself, as far as I know. After all, WP is the encyclopedia anyone can edit.
One tip: all mentions of species' scientific names in the article should be in italics, without exception; this includes the genus and the specific epithet, whether written out completely, or abbreviated. To whit: B. vulgaris, Bambusa vulgaris. All levels above the level of genus are never italicized, so they can always be left alone.
I promise to get back to it, but it may be some time late this coming week. In the interim, if you want you can post to the WikiProject talk page, and see if a botanist will also lend some expert help. Thanks, Hamamelis ( talk) 09:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
This RFC seems to be getting responses only from IPs... can you recruit an expert to clarify this? or maybe a notification on a relevant noticeboard to attract some comments? -- lTopGunl ( talk) 17:57, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thanks for your kind words but i cant take it here. too stressful, now i am told i dont count at all [Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir Kush] and i know too many people on here are making it look like they want it too and this site isnt objective at all, and we cant do anything about it. Bouket ( talk) 18:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Just for your information — there's no need to tag the talk page for speedy deletion. Talk pages are supposed to be deleted when their articles are deleted, so I would have deleted the talk page immediately after deleting the article even if you'd not tagged it. Nyttend ( talk) 14:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Aditya,
I'm really hard pressed for time. Not able to find enough time to address my various arguments, including with you. :) So my contribution to your quest is to provide a section missing vide Plant MOS - Description. However the urls are barebones and you will need to cloak them with cite webs. Ask for help in general WikiProjects Plants and India. You may like to ask User:Shyamal too for his opinion. Sorry cant help more at this stage. Hope it helps. Will pay more attention later when I'm free. AshLin ( talk) 14:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
This is a notice to all users who currently have at least one open peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review. Because of the large number of peer review requests and relatively low number of reviewers, the backlog of PRs has been at 20 or more almost continually for several months. The backlog is for PR requests which have gone at least four days without comments, and some of these have gone two weeks or longer waiting for a review.
While we have been able to eventually review all PRs that remain on the backlog, something had to change. As a result of the discussion here, the consensus was that all users are now limited to one (1) open peer review request.
If you already have more than one open PR, that is OK in this transition period, but you cannot open any more until all your active PR requests have been closed. If you would like someone to close a PR for you, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Peer review. If you want to help with the backlog, please review an article whoe PR request is listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog/items. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 01:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi! Update in Talk:Gauḍa region. Regards.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 04:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, hope all is well. This User:Kmzayeem keeps changing History of Bengal template to History of Bangladesh. As seen here and here. Please help stop this vandalism. Thank you ( 69.112.76.243 ( talk) 00:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC))
This is code of my signature
<font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ED791A 0em 0em 0.8em,#F55220 -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#1D6B00 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#000000">[[User:Titodutta|Tito Dutta]] [[User talk:Titodutta|<big>✉</big>]]
I tried to add CSS type effect. More specifically I tried to make it like Indian flag (above saffron blue links (name, talk) and green below), but I know it does not look like that! --
Tito Dutta
✉ 01:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
I know you moved the Bette Davis pic on this user's talk page to fix some formatting issues. As a courtesy I just wanted to let you know that I have subsequently adjusted the Bette Davis pic to more closely resemble my original placement of it there. My intention was not for the pic to bookmark the entire June 2012 Notices section but for this user to notice and know that their ongoing editing practices (no references, no edit summaries, clogging up edit histories with incremental edits) are against accepted Wikipedia practices and guidelines - I sometimes use images with my notes to editors that are in the their interest-range (& that are also not one of the usual WP Notice/Warning logos). Cheers, Shearonink ( talk) 16:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
"Work in progress" above in your talk page is a disambiguation page! -- Tito Dutta ✉ 04:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
The article Andrew Nelson (author) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Bgwhite (
talk) 00:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
The page Bangla rock was full of partial information, I have entered some facts there but still it needs more information especially about Bangladesh. Please go through the Talk page there. - Kmzayeem ( talk) 16:56, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
As you are active in Military history articles, feel free to remove WP:SPS pakdef.info from wiki articles, that you come across. The WP:RSN discussion is here, Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_108#Pakdef.info cheers-- DBig Xray 21:14, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Dear Aditya! Is your request still open? Please let me know. Thank you, -- Doc Taxon ( talk) 17:12, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
you or i can remove the unstantiated information i added
also the info i removed may have been incorrect — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raam2012 ( talk • contribs) 22:32, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
I just saw that you changed the title of 2013 Bangladesh violence after ICT verdicts to 2013 Bangladesh riots. I understand the title should be more compact, however the title 2013 Bangladesh riots is very general. I would request you to suggest a more specific name if you do not like the title: 2013 Bangladesh violence after ICT verdicts. Thanks. Pratanu.roy ( talk) 06:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
You recently comment on a RM on the article 1971 Bangladesh atrocities. The discussion was closed and the article moved to the previous title by another editor per WP:RM/TR. A new RM has been initiated and can be found here Darkness Shines ( talk) 16:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello Aditya, I have been given the article Sundarbans South Wildlife Sanctuary to 'Wikify', and I have found the large Sundarbans acticle and feel that the three small articles that you created in 2011 would be more noticed and appropriate if they are combined with this larger article. I have copied the material from the South, East and West articles to the Sundarbans article in the Geography section. The West one does not have much specific information about it. I wonder what you think of the material being moved here. If it works effectively, the three small articles could be deleted. What do you think? Travers ( talk) 02:42, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
FYI: Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#2013_Bangladesh_India_WikiProjects_dispute_resolution.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 14:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi!
Your comments here would be appreciated!-- ArmanJ ( talk) 10:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Just wondering if you've had a chance to stop by the bikini article in recent months and see the effects of the effort made to continue to improve the work? I noted your comments peppered throughout a talk page archive there and so you must've been a primary contributor to the article, hence I thought I'd check in with you, even if several years may have passed since you were regularly involved there. Az x2 17:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Aditya! Just a heads up that since the BIKINI article has entered into a period of "stability", with us three most prolific contributors having concluded our most active periods editing and improving the article, I made the Good Article Nomination... Hopefully the bikini-nomination gets picked up for review soon and we don't have to wait months. But I wanted to notify you and Btphelps so that you would be aware of the nomination and hopefully available to respond to a reviewer should one materialize. Hopefully any reviewer considering the article will also notify both of you if they proceed so that you could respond. And I also wanted to make you aware of the GAN so that any reviewer would see that whatever the differences are that may have informed your perspectives in editing the article, it IS stable and not subject to any edit warring whatsoever, that anything initially viewed as contentious has either been re-evaluated or otherwise resolved. Thanks! Az x2 19:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Miss Süddeutschland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Inanygivenhole ( talk) 20:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Aditya Kabir. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you! | |
Message added on 14:05, 14 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template. |
To be frank, I could use some help on how that's done. Morinae ( talk) 17:17, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Can I have some help refining the intro in this article? -- 31.205.56.85 ( talk) 07:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Please open a WP:PR and I will review it.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for late reply. Sure I can help. I can go through it in more detail but did you have anything specific in mind? Thx :) Presto808 ( talk) 17:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Aditya -- I just thought I'd ask you whether you approve of the recent edits to Bangladesh. I believe I recall that there was a discussion at some point on the Talk page about the language. I'll let you decide whether the changes to content in the article are correct, but after you decide that, grammatical errors in the new material must be addressed, including "it's" when it should be "its" and "there are some amount of" would need to be corrected. I'll await your review and any changes you make. CorinneSD ( talk) 15:04, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I think you did not notice the recent Talk:Bangladesh page. I am open to discussion about pictures. ( Mohd. Toukir Hamid ( talk) 19:19, 12 March 2014 (UTC))
The article Ratan Kumar Paul has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. C1776M Talk 16:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I have somewhat expanded it after its merger with Bengali nationalism, let me know if the merger is still needed. Thanks. -- Zayeem (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in a discussion here. --» nafSadh did say 19:39, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Dear Kabir, I invite you to express your opinion about the article for deletion. -- Rossi101 ( talk) 18:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Rossi101
A convention for naming geographic locations in Bangladesh is proposed. You are invited to discuss. – nafSadh did say 01:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Bangladesh Premier League. We're currently facing problems to run this project and we need your help! If you have a spare moment, please join and help us.-- Pratyya (Hello!) 15:18, 4 December 2014 (UTC) |
Hello Mr. Aditya!
First of all, thanks for thank (the one you gave me for my edits)! Two months ago, you asked me if I had any information about aviation in Bangladesh before WWII. Well, I'm not very sure anyone has any information on that. As far as my knowledge goes, there was barely any aviation activity in the then Bengal of the British Empire. Many of the airstrips in Bangladesh today were built during WWII, so its highly unlikely anything significant took place here. I, however, will ask a few people who might know something and let you know. By the way, sorry for the extremely late reply! I have been busy with life lately.
Good Day! :) Rihaz ( talk) 11:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Just wanted to say that while I don't have the time to review Bikini spot checking indicates to me that it's very ready to go; I don't think you'll have much trouble at GAN once it finally gets started. Wonder why that is! :) Res Mar 20:52, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bikini you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS ( talk) 05:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
The article Bikini you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bikini for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS ( talk) 00:40, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
I saw. Going to make some proposals on the talk page now because I think that the treatment you were given was unnecessary and grossly unfair. Res Mar 00:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Bengali people#List of people in the collage. Thanks. ~ nafSadh did say 15:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
I didn't see a response, but I said here (once it is archived; I thought that would happen today) to try WP:VPT.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Clean your talk page . Too many old messages. CosmicEmperor ( talk) 18:28, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
There is a generic conventions for geographic names. But that is not clear enough for places in Bangladesh. That is why a WP:BDPLACE is proposed and it is time to adopt it.
A discussion is taking place here and an RfC is made. Please participate. nafSadh did say 22:20, 18 April 2015 (UTC)]
Moving it to Talk:South Asia. nafSadh did say 13:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
You might want to have a look into this and provide WP:3O. nafSadh did say 13:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I saw that you submitted Penangkal petir for speedy deletion based on its coverage of the subject of Lightning rod coupled with it being in Indonesian. I just wanted to let you know that being in a foreign language isn't grounds for speedy deletion. The procedures for such an article are spelled out at WP:Pages needing translation into English. I agreed with your other rationale, though, and converted the tag into a {{ db-a10}} referencing the lightning rod article. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 16:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Aditya Kabir, I'm puzzled by some of the changes you recently made to Wikipedia:BDPLACE/Log. According to WP:BDPLACE:
Thanks, Worldbruce ( talk) 16:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
-- 115ash →(☏) 14:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Due to your comment "The article is now protected, but the editor PakSol has still not received a consensus or sanction or any other community intevention. That may be required if we consider his warring attitude, ignorance of arguments, and, if I may say so, extreme hard-headedness in pushing his POV, which looks a bit like coming from Pakistani Army POV to me. But, that is just my conjecture, yet to be established."__________PakSol is TripWire. I checked my contributions and was surprised that i commented on TripWire's talkpage. But then I found he has deleted his userpage that previously stated,"The user is a serving member of Pakistan Army".-- Cosmic Emperor 05:49, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Aditya Kabir,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Onel5969
TT me 17:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Please comment
There's a afd going on here. It needs to close, but consensus is not certain. More participation is needed. Ibrahim Husain Meraj ( talk) 21:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC) |
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from www.ipcs.org/pdf_file/issue/967511948IPCS-Special-Report-11.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ibrahim Husain Meraj ( talk) 22:15, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Continent. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - BilCat ( talk) 12:17, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello TWL users! We hope JSTOR has been a useful resource for your work. We're organizing a cleanup drive to correct dead links to JSTOR articles – these require JSTOR access and cannot easily be corrected by bot. We'd love for you to jump in and help out!
Sent of behalf of
Nikkimaria for
The Wikipedia Library's JSTOR using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 22:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ekhanei.com, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Aditya Kabir. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Ekhanei.com".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 21:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Aditya Kabir, concerning this edit nearly all of the text is exactly the same to the one above it. There is almost no need for this text in the article and it should be removed. Sure its not word-for-word the exact same but its pretty similar and it conveys no new information. Thanks Inter&anthro ( talk) 17:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
1- Go through the last paragraph of this edit by TalhaZubairButt. He added a section at the end, stating "The West Pakistani soldiers are not the only ones who have been killing in East Bengal, of course. On the night of March 25… the Bengali troops and paramilitary units stationed in East Pakistan mutinied and attacked non-Bengalis with atrocious savagery. Thousands of families of unfortunate Muslims, many of them refugees from Bihar who chose Pakistan at the time of the partition riots in 1947, were mercilessly wiped out. Women were raped, or had their breasts torn out with specially-fashioned knives. Children did not escape the horror; the lucky ones were killed with their parents…"
3- Of late there have been reports of rape and even West Pakistanis are not being spared; on April 12 two West Pakistani women were raped, and an attempt was made on two others. This line is included in the edit.
6- FreeatlastChitchat reverting
Contents added by TalhaZubairButt, and supported by TripWire. There are many edits, I can't show all difference.
1- TripWire's edit. This is a part of a series of edits and reverts. Through this edit, they are trying to show that Pakistan Army came to rescue Biharis. I don't know who first inserted the content.
3- They found a author Sharmila Bose to change History
Many contents were added by TalhaZubairButt and SheriffIsInTown. I can't show all differences. They were edit warring with Volunteer Marek.
1- Whoever inserted this content, was removed by Volunteer Marek and added back by FreeatlastChitchat. If you check carefully, this is another attempt to show that Pakistan Army was the hero in 1971 and Mukti Bahini was the villain FreeatlastChitchat wants to keep the content, most likely added by TalhaZubairButt.
SheriffIsInTown was making repeated disruptive edits as this and this, for which he was warned
Sheriff tried to wipe out all contents instead of trying to find sources. Later on the article was rescued by Sminthopsis84.
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jalsaghar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Israt Manzil.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Aditya Kabir, your image has been deleted. Just wanted to inform you. Lotje ( talk) 13:54, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ananthabhadram Kavya.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 23:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Aditya Kabir. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ekhanei.com homepage.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Israt Manzil.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. czar 09:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Garo Baptist Convention, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tura ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Happy Birthday! Have a good day and many more. Nebulous Nanuqsaurus 13:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Nebulous Nanuqsaurus 13:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nebulous Nanuqsaurus ( talk • contribs)
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Jayne Mansfield has been completed.
There are a few things I wanted to draw to your attention:
In the Early Career section is says that "her prominent breasts were considered problematic" – I’m assuming by advertisers, and added it, but this should be clarified if possible.
In the Film stardom (1955–1958) section it says she performed Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter 444 times. In the Stage career section it says she performed 450 shows - I added "about" before 450 which should be good enough to explain the discrepancy.
In the Television career section this sentence appears: In November 1957, one of her nightclub acts was featured in a special episode of NBC's The Perry Como Show ("Holiday in Las Vegas"), which created "a situation" for the audience according to the broadcaster. "A situation" needs to be clarified.
In the Soundtracks section it says that she sang two songs for The Sheriff of Fractured Jaw and lip-synced to one by Connie Francis. In the Film stardom (1955–1958) section it says that Francis sang all three songs. Which is correct.
Live Performances: This song title which is not capitalized appears – "This Queen has her aces in all the right places" – I to checked the title and found that this is actually a line in the lyrics to a song in the musical Damn Yankees - called "A Little Brains, A Little Talent". Need to check this.
I placed several "citation" or "clarification" tags throughout the article to draw attention to other issues.
Without access to the original sources, it may be difficult to resolve these. This is also true with sentences/paragraphs with multiple citations. It may well be that multiple citations are necessary, and not a case of over citing, but again, without the original sources, who knows?
I suspect that reviewers will say that an article can have only one Info Box at the head of the article. You might consider making sure the information in the later boxes is included in the article and remove them.
Good luck going forward with this.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 14:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Lets try to solve the dispute on DRN. I do not want this to consume too much of our time. Saadkhan12345 ( talk) 18:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Saadkhan12345 ( talk) 18:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, it gives us great pleasure to inform that the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) 2018 programme organised by CIS-A2K is going to be held from 26–28 January 2018.
Please see more about this program at: CIS-A2K/Events/Train the Trainer Program/2018. Please fill this form to show your interest to join. The last date of signing up is 7 December 2017. If you have any question, please let us know.
On behalf of Titodutta. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 11:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Aditya Kabir. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Most of the prose you included in the above article was copied from various copyright web pages. Some of this was detected by automatic plagiarism detection software and the remainder I found manually. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, most of the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 22:05, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017
Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font>
tags, which are causing
Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing
Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.
You are encouraged to change
:( <font face="Kristen ITC" color="deeppink">[[User:Aditya Kabir|Aditya]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Aditya Kabir|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aditya Kabir|contribs]])</sup>
: :(
Aditya(
talk •
contribs)to
:( [[User:Aditya Kabir|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC; color: deeppink;">Aditya</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Aditya Kabir|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aditya Kabir|contribs]])</sup>
: :(
Aditya(
talk •
contribs)— Anomalocaris ( talk) 07:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello ! Apu Hope you are well
I can see your edit recently in the page Greater Bangladesh as i am not sure you edited in Previous United Bengal page or not . You are one of the passionate Wikipedian your contribution is all over Wikipedia . Mostly Bangladesh Related and i respect your work .
The United Bengal page was developed by many wikidpedians from many years . One of the user recently moved the page to Greater Bangladesh and even deleted the previous united Bengal page and he created a new one for redirect .
As you must know The Term " United Bengal " a historical reality and The term greater Bangladesh is a off topic . I am not against the page Greater Bangladesh . But the merger of the page united Bengal to greater Bangladesh was a immature or planned task . As I am also a new Wikipedian and cant exactly recover the old united Bengal page .
I think its a serious issue and a planned disinformation tactics . waiting for your opinion -- Aziz Tarak. ( talk) 15:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Material you included in the above article back in 2012 appears to have been copied from the copyright web pages https://findingaid.lib.byu.edu/viewItem/MSS%201449 and http://articles.latimes.com/1995-04-26/news/mn-58998_1_biographer. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 12:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018
Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Dead bodies of Bengali intellectuals, 14 December 1971.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 03:00, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018
Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:49, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018
Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018
Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018
French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Aditya Kabir. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Aditya Kabir. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Template:Haors in Bangladesh has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 ( talk) 00:37, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Wax Dey, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.postnewsline.com/2009/05/african-dream-wax-aka-nde-ndifonka.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Wax Dey saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! – Jonesey95 ( talk) 09:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:40, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Five years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:41, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
... and six -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BKash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robi ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:07, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Great work on bKash Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 03:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC) |
Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Hey are you crazy ? Why did you put Afghanistan in the Indian Subcontinent ? As I am of Afghan origin I feel greatly insulted, change this please, every Afghan feel cringe when a South Asian try to put us in their region we are not, it's not because some Pashtuns and Turkic people coming from actual Afghanistan ruled your countries that we are South Asians/Indian Subcontinent, I know it's all political and I think you greatly accept Hindutva ideology which is literally an "Indian" Nazism. I wanted to let you know that every Afghan hate your false contributions to Wikipedia and I hope one day you will that all this political and racist bullsh** was stupid, what are your arguments ? Afghans watch Bollywood ? Moghol Empire (that was only present in Kabul region, by the way the rulers were Central Asians) ? Gandhara (only parts of Kabul) ? Did you forget that Afghanistan is the homeland of Iranic people literally, it's the most probable country where they split between Eastern Iranians and Western Iranians, Iranic are Central Asians and you know this, did you forget about Bactrians, Sassanides, Samanids, Safavids, Arab Caliphates, and more ? Like I said in another thread, more than 50% of Afghanistan are Persian speakers and Turkic language speakers, are you blind ? Islam ? Ghaznavids converted Indians actual Pakistanis did you know that ? Go seriously check a physician to cure you racism and your insecurities. From a Persian speaking Afghan from Central and Northern Afghanistan, دعب رادید ات Spoopy2001 ( talk) 10:17, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
تا دیدار بعد Spoopy2001 ( talk) 10:18, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Private universities in Bangladesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 19:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
-- Hipal/Ronz ( talk) 16:59, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jazmin Chaudhry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:40, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cleavage (breasts), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujrat ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Adiyta, hope that you're well whereever you are based. I want to leave a short message on your talk page. Firstly, thanks for your edits to that article! It's great to have someone interested and improving the articles around here. I saw your request for some additional editors at WT:ANAT, so I have also dropped a message at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red. Cleavage is a complex article that I feel probably requires more than one editor to get an appropriate nuance - I hope you don't take this the wrong way, as it looks well on its way to a good article status and I can see how hard you are editing on it. You probably also saw my message at Talk:Intermammary cleft. Again, I hope it is not taken the wrong way if I disagree with you. Happy to continue discussing at that page. Let me know if there's anything else that I can help out with - I'll be sure to keep cleavage on my watchlist and will have a look at it from an anatomical perspective within the next week or so. Cheers -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 23:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, guess you are already preoccupied. Could you take a look at the discussion here if time permits? Thanks. -- Zayeem (talk) 15:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Stop edit warring on Bangladesh liberation war. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 04:43, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
You undid my edit by removing Assam Province (current Northeast India). Well here Assam means the current Northeast India. Due to an act in the Indian constitution, states were formed on the basis of ethnicities.
Even in "The Bengal borderland: beyond state and nation in South Asia" - the citation used in the article has mentioned that - "Assam, a state (province) of India, gradually broke into several smaller states: Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Nagaland (See Appendix Figure 2)"
And this demand is as old as East Pakistan. During 1947, West Pakistan leaders (including Jinnah) & East Pakistan leaders were expecting Assam Province as a part of Pakistan. Moinul Haque Chowdhary the Private Secretary of Jinnah, who after Independence became a Minister in Assam and later at Delhi, told Jinnah that he would "present Assam to him on a silver platter". So, I see no reason why you would undo my edit. Tizen03 ( talk) 07:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you.
Referring to this gross violation of WP:CANVASS, be mindful of WP:BATTLE and stop ridiculing exisitng contributions as "nationalistic POVs". Abhishek0831996 ( talk) 05:56, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi. You've posted your comments in the admin section on Aman.kumar.goel's AE complaint. Instead, make a new section "Statement by Aditya Kabir" under my statement and post the material there. -- RegentsPark ( comment) 12:26, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 04:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bishonen |
tålk 10:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Aditya Kabir ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I believe this block decision was a bit too hasty and was done without looking at the case closely. The complaint (which may have been a reaction to the discussion but to an arbitration request, where similar behaviour of the complaining party gets only a slap on the wrist) was made of a handful of cherrypicked misrepresentation of diffs, like:
The blocking admin, who quickly applied the block (in 6 hours, and before I get to present my case), said in her/his statement:
Finally, according to the statement by the blocking admin, one of the reasons for blocking me is WP:CIR. May be another way to look at it is WP:CIRNOT, especially if the targeted editor has been involved in improving dozens of articles to FA and GA status, has been key in mediating a number of disputes, successful nomination of admins, and even revision of policy. The two CIR points that possibly could apply may be:
It took me some time to respond to this because I expected better investigation before an admin action (though, of course, admins are not perfect, and thet may not even reply to a politely hurt comment on the block) aginst a long stading editor, and having to delve into this type of lawyering is really depressing. I would rather read sources and improve articles (may be a recent example of my collaboration would illustrate a few points in that direction). But, well... sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do, even if a 48 hr block does not mean the end of the world. Hence this appeal. Otherwise a sub-par blocking would remain the outcome of a nasty war of invicilities and stonewalling. Thanks. Aditya( talk • contribs) 01:49, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
P.S. I just found out that I was blocked for "disruptive editing" though neither the complaint nor the blocking editors statement has any proof of that. Is that a mistake? Aditya( talk • contribs) 02:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is too long, no ones going to read that, especially for just a 48 hour block. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 03:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Tough times, let's have some beer and reminisce the good ol' days. If it's worth anything, you had a great impact on my transformation from a noob to a regular contributor. Last few days have been nasty but I'm sure you'll come back stronger. Cheers! Zayeem (talk) 18:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC) |
It seems that right after coming off from a block you have resumed your talk page disruption. [24] I would note that the next block for similar edits will be longer than what you had seen earlier. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 00:32, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
in accordance with another action made on that very page shortly before (diff above)— I'm not sure I quite understand your argument. Please explain the connection. El_C 22:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cleavage (breasts), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Free Love and Paraffin.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for improving Cleavage! - MP 24 August has one of "my places" (click on August) pictured. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:57, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Aditya Kabir. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Cleavage (breasts) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 01:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC) |
( ←) Hi again Aditya, I'm surprised to see this article back at the GOCE so soon. I note your copyvio concern and I took a look at the detected 67%-match source here; this seems to be a CC-BY-SA source that says:
"This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/), which allows others to remix, tweak and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms."
So I think you might be on safe ground here; a note in the edit summary would be attribution; it might even have been copied from Wikipedia but I haven't (and probably won't) check that. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 21:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Let me know when you'll be done with your break and I'll withdraw the RfC. Za-ari-masen ( talk) 09:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
I reverted you and ask that you read WP:Picture tutorial about upright and fixed sizes. Keep in mind that not everyone's monitor fits a particular size plus you have to consider the default that person has set for image sizes. Upright helps to eliminate those issues and keeps the images better aligned with the sections. You can always click on the image if you wish to enlarge it. Atsme Talk 📧 18:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)