Hello, I'm Sakura emad. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Gouda cheese—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 ( talk) 17:19, 16 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm NP83. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Call option have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. NP83 ( talk) 15:22, 31 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Rapeseed, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CodeTalker ( talk) 18:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tommy Westphall. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CodeTalker ( talk) 18:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Coup d'état, you may be blocked from editing. Technopat ( talk) 13:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Keller Rinaudo Cliffton have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. DreamRimmer ( talk) 16:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Code talker. - FlightTime ( open channel) 14:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Adakiko. An edit you recently made to Andaman and Nicobar Islands seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko ( talk) 12:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Melvin Hudson. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to University of Groningen have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Melvin Hudson ( talk) 08:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC) reply