Hello, I'm MagentaCat1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Artificial intelligence art have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Don't remove templates MagentaCat1 ( talk) 22:22, 30 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Stop adding content with the ^{citation needed} tag from the beginning. If you don't have a citation to provide with the addition, don't add it. 2601:1C2:4000:A5A0:64EE:F33F:266F:A492 ( talk) 06:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Do not add "cult" claims to film articles without reliable sources to support any such claims. [1] Please also note that the lead section of film articles is supposed to summarize (not supplant) what is actually in the article body, WP:FILMLEAD so any claims in the lead should be clearly sourced in the article body and carry enough weight to be highlighted in the lead section. -- 109.255.172.191 ( talk) 15:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Tom and Jerry: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. -- Mr Fink ( talk) 01:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   EvergreenFir (talk) 06:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to El Salvador, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 22:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anti-Swedish sentiment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk| contribs) 02:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, 163.123.56.250! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk| contribs) 02:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anti-Liechtensteiner sentiment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk| contribs) 02:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply