Hello. Thanks for the information at H. F. Chorley. Would you kindly add a citation for the source you used for the information and quotes? Thanks! Best regards, -- Ssilvers ( talk) 16:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC) reply

The reference is James Harding, Gounod (New York: Stein and Day, 1973),179-80. ----

Thanks. I added the cite to the article for you. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 07:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello, Vlastimil Svoboda! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gimme danger ( talk) 21:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC) reply Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

		The Music Barnstar
		For all of your excellent work in creating articles on the operas of Josef Mysliveček I award you the music barnstar. Keep up the great work! I look foreword to more opera related articles from your pen. Best. 4meter4 ( talk) 21:56, 11 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your recent additions to the article, which is to be Today's Featured Article on 4 September. I do have a few concerns:-

• In your footnote 28 you say "It is a notable shortcoming of studies such as Zaslaw (1991), Solomon (1995), Gutman (1999), and Sadie (2006) that they do not take into account the importance of Mysliveček as a stylistic model for the young Mozart and intimate friend of Leopold Mozart during all three of Mozart's trips to Italy in the face of the clear evidence contained in the Mozart correspondence." This statement, as it stands, reads as POV. If Freeman said it, it should be couched in terms such as "Freeman claims that..." – he does not have preeminence among Mozart scholars – and there should be a specific citation to support this wording, especially such assertions as "intimate friend" etc. In the meantime I have withdrawn the footnote, pending establishment of its credentials.
• You have added to the text: "Both Leopold and Wolfgang found his [Mysliveček's] personality irrestistably charming...," This is cited to Freeman, but it is very much at odds with what other scholars say (e.g. Gutman, pp. 372–75, Sadie 422–23). Wolfgang found the first meeting very traumatic. Another case, perhaps, of Freeman's view contrary to all others?
• I have reduced the size of the Mysliveček image you added (and removed another to make room for it - we must not overcrowd with images). However, the image lacks details of its source and creator. These details should be added to the image file. I have changed the licence from PD-old to PD-art.

Comments before 4 September would be appreciated. Brianboulton ( talk) 13:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply

(Later) I have now completed my readthrough of the Mozart in Italy article prior to its TFA. I was surprised to see the disproportionate extent of Mysliveček-related material you had inserted. Whatever view Freeman has, it is plain from the vast amount of existing Mozart scholarship that Mysliveček was a relatively minor influence, and the article should reflect this. I have removed much of the material - the article is about Mozart's experiences in Italy, of which his interactions with form only a small part, and many of your insertions were inconsequential and uncited. If you wish to press the case for more about Mysliveček, please use the Mozart article's talkpage for further discussion of the matter. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Bourbon Baroque has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable band.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OSborn ^arf _{contributionatoration} 22:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Friends of the Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. AndrewWTaylor ( talk) 19:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC) reply

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		In recognition of your outstanding cleanup & copyediting of United States presidential election articles. JayJasper ( talk) 21:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Empress Dowager Cixi‎, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Dougweller ( talk) 05:39, 3 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Ezio (Mysliveček) (1777). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 12:47, 27 October 2011 (UTC) reply

It is fascinating that you have removed referenced material from this article, and claimed that it is 'esoterica,' whilst leaving the longer sections of unreferenced material untouched. Personally, I judge that historical materials with a creditable source are more valuable than those with no references, irrespective of content.

For instance, the selections of surviving Scottish poetry (which you deleted) indicate the climate of propanganda in Scotland at the royal marriage, in its original terms. Similarly, Margaret's itinerary, which records the places in England where she stayed where there was ceremony for the Scottish queen, also shows the machinery of Tudor rule. It might also be claimed that readers of wikipedia with an association those places might find the itinerary of interest. Unoquha ( talk) 01:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Pope Innocent III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brabant ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:34, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Pope Innocent IV ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Tartar and Council of Lyon

Pope Boniface VIII ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Council of Lyons

Pope Clement VI ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Maumont

Pope Gregory XI ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Maumont

Pope Gregory XII ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ragusa

Pope Innocent VIII ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Moor

Pope Paul II ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Subiaco

Pope Sixtus IV ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Giuliano de' Medici

Pope Urban VI ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tivoli

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Pope Felix III ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Apparition

Pope Innocent I ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Alaric

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:41, 4 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Joseph Stalin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Troika ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Pierre Nord Alexis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jamacia ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:11, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Antonio López de Santa Anna ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Native Americans

Félix María Zuloaga ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Junta

José Ignacio Pavón ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Junta

José Joaquín de Herrera ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jalapa

José Mariano Salas ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Regency

Juan Álvarez ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Captain

Manuel Robles Pezuela ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Junta

Miguel Miramón ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Junta

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Deodoro da Fonseca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Humanist ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Boleslaus I, Duke of Bohemia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wenceslaus I ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:42, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Margaret Pole, Countess of Salisbury ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sir Arthur Pole

William Neville, 1st Earl of Kent ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dieppe

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Duchy of Burgundy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Auxerrois and Battle of Poitiers ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Margaret of Austria, Queen of Bohemia ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Isaac Komnenos, Theodora Angelina and Mstislav of Kiev

Bretislaus III, Duke of Bohemia ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Margaret

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:45, 6 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Albert III, Duke of Austria ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Otto II, Duke of Bavaria and Hugh of Chalon

Leopold III, Duke of Austria ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Otto II, Duke of Bavaria and Hugh of Chalon

Rudolf IV, Duke of Austria ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Otto II, Duke of Bavaria and Hugh of Chalon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Maria of Calabria ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marie of Valois

Marie d'Évreux ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blanche of Navarre

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC) reply

You appear to be edit warring at United States presidential election, 2012. You should not repeatedly revert people just because you have a version of the article you prefer. Please read Wikipedia:Edit warring for a description of why this behavior is harmful. Please stop and take your issues to the article talk page without restoring your preferred text. Continuing to edit war is something that an administrator may block you for. I don't want you to be blocked, which is why I am giving you this heads up. Change the way in which you try to change articles, and instead of edit warring, discuss the matter and come up with a consensus or compromise on the article talk page instead. Thanks. -- Jayron 32 20:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Celia Gámez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tango ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:38, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Dobrý den, kolego, chci se zeptat, co Vás vedlo k tomuto přesunu. Máte nějaký důvod (kromě obdobné chyby v textu českého článku) domnívat se, že jde o příjmení? Podle mě jde o přivlastňovací tvar – Božena, dcera Křesinova. Vizte též tento článek. Možná by bylo lepší zvolit rozlišovač jako v jiných jazycích, tj. duchess. S pozdravem Gumruch ( talk) 19:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States House of Representatives elections, 1810, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Speaker of the House of Representatives ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ancestry of Elizabeth II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:36, 8 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles V of France, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Third Estate and Clovis ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:46, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis XIV of France, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cartagena and Anne of England ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis XV of France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Paris ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:08, 21 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marie Joséphine of Savoy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dauphin ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:47, 28 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marie Leszczyńska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dauphin ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:26, 14 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Toccata quarta ( talk) 20:00, 2 April 2013 (UTC) reply

thanks for helping out on election articles. HOWEVER making multiple edits all at once makes life difficult for other editors. One at a time works fine. Otherwise if an editor disagrees with one of your changes he will have to get rid of multiple useful changes. Rjensen ( talk) 07:55, 6 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States presidential election, 1868, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Speaker of the House of Representatives ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:39, 13 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

United States presidential election, 1840 ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Speaker of the House of Representatives

United States presidential election, 1856 ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Speaker of the House of Representatives

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:22, 20 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello there, I've noticed that you've made a series of page moves concerning various royal consorts. I've reverted these moves because they were not discussed and they contravene the established naming conventions for royalty here on Wikipedia. If you would like to see these pages moved, I would encourage you to submit a move request, start a discussion, and/or discuss the matter on the talk page for the royal naming conventions. Thanks :) Seven Letters 00:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Prague may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 06:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Is there a page number to which you can refer in the Freeman reference comments? And you quoting him or just summarizing his views? Viva-Verdi ( talk) 01:58, 3 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jake Runestad, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Conductor and Ensembles. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 13 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jake Runestad may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *"Vocalise Mystique" (2009), SATB)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 04:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of Bulgaria may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:11, 29 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of Portugal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• in the newly-formed kingdom, a new class emerged that was previously unknown in Roman times: a [nobility] that played a tremendous social and political role during the [[Middle Ages]]. It was

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of Poland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• wars and the deterioration of the country's political system. Significant internal reforms]] were introduced during the later part of the 18th century in the [[Constitution of May 3, 1791]],

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:26, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of Poland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Poland. The reigns of King [[Sigismund I the Old|Sigismund I]] and King [[Sigismund II Augustus]]) witnessed an intense cultivation of culture and science (a [[Polish Golden Age|Golden Age]] of the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:21, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of Poland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [Tsardom of Russia|Russia]] for supremacy in Eastern Europe in the wake of its [[Time of Troubles]]), a period referred to as the [[Polish–Muscovite War (1605–1618)|Polish-Muscovite War]] (or the "

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dark Ages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of Poland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Amidst continuing social and national upheaval, a further shakeup took place]] in the party leadership as part of what is known as the [[Polish October]] of 1956.<ref name="

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of Poland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• . The recently open or semi-open opposition communications were replaced by underground publishing (known in the eastern bloc as [[Samizdat]], as Solidarity was reduced to a few thousand underground
• occurred concurrently with the reformist leadership of [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] in the Soviet Union (known as [[Glasnost]].<ref name="playground II xxiii"/> In September 1986, a general amnesty was

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of Lithuania may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Livonia was then incorporated into the Polish Crown by Sigismund II. These developments caused [Ivan the Terrible] of Russia to launch attacks in Livonia beginning in 1558, and later on

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of Lithuania may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Besides war, the Commonwealth suffered the [[Great Northern War plague outbreak]] and famine (the worst caused by the [[Great Frost of 1709]]. These calamities resulted in the loss of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC) reply

I think saying "split infinitive corrected" in edit summaries is presumptuous. Implying that split infinities are incorrect takes too strong a stance and is biased and misleading (see Split infinitive#Current views. I'd prefer a more neutral edit summary along the lines of "split infinitive avoided" or something like that if you wish to unsplit infinitives in articles. Just a thought. Jason Quinn ( talk) 14:13, 18 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Just a word of thanks for your excellent work on the above article. Cheers,  Philg88 ^{♦ talk} 19:52, 14 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Galeazzo Ciano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Rome. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 26 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Richard of York, 3rd Duke of York may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of the nobility could suffer, and York was now in the same situation as Henry of Bolingbroke (the future King [[Enry IV of ENgland|Henry IV]] in 1398. Only a successful invasion of England

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cecily Neville, Duchess of York may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] and the baby's [[baptism]] was a simple and private affair, unlike that of his younger brother [[Edmund, Earl of Rutland, which was public and lavish). This is countered by other historians, however, who point out that Cecily's husband could easily,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:56, 27 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edmund of Langley, 1st Duke of York, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brest and Castile. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Treaty of Lunéville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Venetia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:00, 16 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Treaty of Amiens may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• to block the cession of Trinidad to Britain was one of the things that irritated King [[[[Carlos IV of Spain|Carlos IV]] the most.<ref>Schneid, p. 25</ref> Spanish economic interests were

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:12, 18 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Considering nearly half the sources for this article are by Edward Smedley, which clearly is not a reliable source, that could be part of the problem? -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 23:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Genrikh Yagoda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Troika. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Carol II of Romania may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of the Romanian royal family to be raised in the [[Romanian Orthodox Church|Orthodox]] faith.<ref>[http://www.cs.kent.edu/~amarcus/Mihai/english/carol2en.html King Carol II<!-- Bot generated title -

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bulgaria during World War I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to United States presidential election, 1868 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• American]]s could vote in every Northern or Reconstructed Southern state, in accordance with the [First Reconstruction Act]}. Every state except [[Florida]] used popular votes to determine electors for the [[Electoral

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:22, 6 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States presidential election, 1892, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Powerbroker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello Vlastimil Svoboda, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Dreams of the Fallen has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 16:58, 20 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saint Vincent Panels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John I. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John II of Portugal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Isabella, Princess of Asturias and Moura. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 28 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John III of Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catherine of Austria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John V of Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magnum opus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armada. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello Vlastimil, and thanks for your contributions. Just a note to inform you that simply writing "editing needed" does not provide an informative edit summary. In your edit summaries, please summarize what you have done. Thanks in advance for considering this. Eric ^talk 03:05, 13 September 2016 (UTC) reply

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thank you for copyediting Otto I, Holy Roman Emperor. All improvements of my English (kind of) syntax are appreciated :). GermanJoe ( talk) 18:01, 11 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Vlastimil Svoboda. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for correcting my misspelling of "Norwegian" in History of Scania Boeing720 ( talk) 11:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, it is evident that you were engaged or paid to promote Antonia Felix on Wikipedia. Please review Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure carefully before proceeding and do not re-add this content, as Felix does not appear to meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability. -- Laser brain (talk) 02:37, 15 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Здравствуйте.

Your edit on seriousness of Don G's crime causing damnation is ANALYSIS, which does not belong in the "Synopsis" section. It is also ORIGINAL RESEARCH (your personal analysis without a reliable source) which is ABSOLUTELY FORBIDDEN by Wikipedia. (Synopses do not need sourcing; the work itself is the source, BUT by the same token synopses should contain ONLY plot-summary, not analysis.)

Your entry on the setting (maybe Seville, maybe not) should probably be somewhere other than the synopsis. If you're gonna put it in the synopsis, then it should be much shorter--maybe one line: "Setting: A city in Spain, possibly Seville". (Brevity is the soul of wit.) If you want to discuss the different reasons for believing the setting is or is not Seville, as you did, that would belong in a different section.

Regards, HandsomeMrToad ( talk) 16:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC) reply

UPDATE:

1. The one-sentence summary of the synopsis is appropriate and does not require a source; the opera itself is the source for a synopsis and for the very short summary of the synopsis. Therefore, not OR. (This is Wikipedia's policy on plot summaries and OR.) In contrast, an interpretive analysis of what makes the Don worthy of damnation is NOT summary, does NOT belong in the synopsis, and DOES require a source to avoid being OR, because the libretto itself does NOT discuss the question of which of the dirty Don's many dirty deeds merits damnation. If you can find a reliable source which supports your interpretive analysis of this question, it might be appropriate for the article, just not in the synopsis. Go for it! Be bold! But find a source first.

2. Thank you for putting the interesting Seville/not-Seville discussion elsewhere other than in the synopsis, and for sourcing it. No problem now, significantly improves the article! Very nice. My only beef was with your putting it in the wrong section before, and not sourcing it.

Best wishes, HandsomeMrToad ( talk) 03:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply

PS, if we're gonna thrash these issues out further, we should probably discuss them in a new section on the DonG TALK page. HandsomeMrToad ( talk) 03:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply

FURTHER UPDATE: See the DonG TALK page for further comments on your most recent edit. Your discussion of WHY the Don is damned is NOT synopsis, and you are supposed to ASSUME GOOD FAITH and not make personal attacks. But read my comment on the TALK page. HandsomeMrToad ( talk) 04:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Edit-warring, such as you are doing in the SYNOPSIS section of the Don Giovanni article, is forbidden by Wikipedia. You can be rebuked, temporarily suspended, or even permanently banned from Wikipedia for it, which would be a shame. You need to go to the Don Giovanni TALK page Talk:Don_Giovanni#Introductory_sentence_in_SYNOPSIS and explain your position, as I have done, and seek consensus, from other editors, and then go along with the consensus. Repeatedly reverting another user's edits without seeking consensus on the TALK page, is EDIT-WARRING, forbidden by Wikipedia. I don't want to have to report you to the moderators for this. So please stop doing it. Thanks! HandsomeMrToad ( talk) 17:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, Vlastimil Svoboda. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Medici, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 1 March 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Giuliano de' Medici, Duke of Nemours ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Giovanni de' Medici

Lorenzo de' Medici ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Porphyry

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cosimo I de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cosimo di Giovanni de' Medici

Giuliano de' Medici, Duke of Nemours ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Giovanni de' Medici

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 22 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Vlastimil Svoboda. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Template:Mysliveček operas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:10, 10 December 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vladislaus III of Moravia, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladislaus III of Moravia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply