The article Andrew Hutchinson (author) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

None of the sources (except the subjects' myspace page) actually seem to discuss the topic. No evidence of meeting WP:AUTHOR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates ( talk) 07:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Rachel Margolis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

avs5221^{( talk| contrib)} 05:09, 30 September 2012 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on ''Kill Your Darlings'' requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — kikichugirl ^inquire 04:17, 26 July 2013 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Jo Case requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kill Your Darlings (magazine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kill Your Darlings (magazine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 06:41, 28 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Australian literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kill Your Darlings ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi Tullyis, I saw your post about running an event at Flinders University, South Australia. You mentioned running it virtually because the time is so much earlier there: Your event doesn't have to coincide with the NYC event! You can run your event whenever you want. Which might mean running it during daylight hours. Heck, the Los Angeles group is running it the next weekend because there are two major art fairs in town Feb 1, and *everyone* is bussssy. But do it as you wish, and we welcome you. You should create an event section for Flinders University, so other Australians can be in conversation about regionally specific subject matter (I have someone from UNSW who is interested)-- Theredproject ( talk) 01:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC) reply

The article Julianne Pierce has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix ( talk) 22:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Julianne Pierce requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix ( talk) 22:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello Tullyis,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Justine Cooper (artist), may be copied from http://eyebeam.org/people/justine-cooper. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot ( talk) 23:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello Tullyis,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Justine Cooper (artist) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf ( talk) 23:38, 1 February 2014 (UTC) Okay it seems you have made a few articles on here-is that page in public domain then I guess? I saw that the bot was on there and I"ve seen several new users today with stuff like this so I thought maybe you were one sorry. Wgolf ( talk) 23:41, 1 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello Tullyis! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women artists. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women artists, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women artists page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

SarahStierch ( talk) 16:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC) reply

You'll be happy to hear that your article on Dorrit Black has been nominated for appearance on the main page of Wikipedia as a "Did You Know" feature, and has been approved for appearance, probably on international women's day. (I nominated it, and expanded it a bit when the reviewer calculated it was a little short.) Thanks for creating it! Mary Mark Ockerbloom ( talk) 14:44, 7 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Albert Gleizes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:08, 7 February 2014 (UTC) reply

On 8 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dorrit Black, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Australian artist Dorrit Black was influenced by the Modernist and Cubist art movements because of her studies in London and Paris? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dorrit Black. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 16:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Adelaide Meetup Next: TBA Last: 6 March 2020 This box: view •  talk •

More info here. Cheers, Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:40, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply

It was decided the meeting should be written up, and that this should be a collaborative exercise. I have "started the ball rolling" at Wikipedia:Meetup/Adelaide/Meetup 8#Meeting summary Cheers, Pdfpdf ( talk) 15:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC) reply

May meetup

Can we get the date sorted a.s.a.p. please? Then we can start "recruiting" attendees ... Cheers, Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC) reply

P.S. I'm happy to start ... errrrr ... (posting to / spamming / choose-your-expression) user talk pages, provided we can decide what to post ... Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gladys Elphick ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kaurna

Lewis O'Brien (Kaurna Elder) ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kaurna

Mollie Dyer ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Yorta Yorta

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 21 April 2014 (UTC) reply

You recently edited several articles changing the spelling of "indigenous" to "Indigenous" (with a capital "I") with the edit summary "changed indigenous to Indigenous for consistency and to be inline with inclusive language principles". Could you point me to the Wikipedia guideline/policy which deals with this matter in the way you describe it? I can't find any such directive at Talk:Indigenous Australians or its archives or at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters and its archives. Some Australian government departments and broadcasters use the capital "I", but others, most prominently The Australian newspaper, don't. The point, however, is that Wikipedia doesn't follow outside style guides (because they are contradictory) but formulates its own, WP:MOS. The relevant part of style guide, MOS:CAPS, has a clear preference for avoiding capital letters unless there is unambiguous usage as a proper name. The word "indigenous" does not fall in that category. You might take note that Wiktionary has only an entry for " Wikt:indigenous", but none for "Wikt:Indigenous". -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 12:36, 22 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, thanks for your comments. You're right: I haven't been able to find it in Wikipedia's policy. You're not quite correct when you say "some government departments" as it is now standard policy pretty much everywhere (I haven't found a department where it isn't policy but I'm wary of being categorical). I acknowledge that the Australian, a prominent newspaper, does not capitalise Indigenous. I think it is absolutely crucial for Wikipedia to adopt the policy, and I note that the majority of pages dealing with Indigenous matter does already do this, at least in part. I'm attempting to make the pages consistent in themselves and consistent with Australian standards. The capitalisation is used to distinguish indigenous and aboriginal as biological terms from Indigenous and Aboriginal as markers of a particular identity. Australian is capitalised. English is capitalised. American is capitalised. Native American is capitalised. Aboriginal and Indigenous need to be capitalised as well and, indeed, they are by many style guides in Australia. Here are the resources I'll be using to make the case:

• https://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/questions-and-answers-about-aboriginal-torres-strait-islander-peoples
• http://www.community.nsw.gov.au/docswr/_assets/main/documents/researchnotes_aboriginal_language.pdf
• http://www.health.qld.gov.au/atsihealth/documents/terminology.pdf
• http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/25122BEAB173151ACA25697E0018FE5B?opendocument
• http://www.austmus.gov.au/Glossary-Indigenous-Australia-terms/
• http://www.aiatsis.gov.au/_files/research/Urban_Web.pdf

It's not a matter of style, in the way style guides exist to ensure consistency and common sense, but a matter of rights and respect. Do you have any suggestions for how to proceed? Thanks for your input. -- Tullyis ( talk) 13:10, 22 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I don't dispute the usage of the capitalised spelling by Australian government departments, but Wikipedia articles on the subject being inconsistent doesn't at all endorse the uppercase usage, does it? And where and why does the term "indigenous" signify any kind of identity? It is indeed a matter of style; to suggest that using the lower case spelling is an expression of disrespect is in itself offensive in several ways. English uses capital letters for proper names, not to express societal values. A proper name is almost always a noun, not an adjective. An adjective can be part of a proper name, e.g. the Roaring Twenties, and that's why "Aboriginal Australian" has been accepted (and "Aboriginal" as its short form) and that's also why "Indigenous Australian" could possibly be considered a proper name. However, your changes at Contemporary Indigenous Australian art do not fall in that category. I don't accept that "indigenous art", "indigenous batik" etc. have to be spelled in uppercase and that not doing so is disrespectful.

I've tried to raise this matter before at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters, with very limited success (1 editor engaged). I don't know any better venue. -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 12:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Davern, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bellbird ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Please read this. Cheers, Pdfpdf ( talk) 06:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Please feel free to correct / expand / clarify / etc. as the mood (or need) takes you. Cheers, Pdfpdf ( talk) 07:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walter Reginald Hume, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fitzroy and Victoria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Free this weekend? Please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Adelaide/Future meetings#Technical Mentors - Unleashed (GovHack Adelaide) for details. Alex Sims ( talk) 11:44, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for creating the summary of the event - it saved me a lot of work! I've expanded it a bit. Cheers, Bahudhara ( talk) 08:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Did my attempt to transfer this work to your Userspace succeed? And if you don't already have enough on your plate, this woman looks interesting: Gertrude Josephine Jude OBE, secretary of L.C.L. and treasurer of Liberal Women's Educational Association, almost certainly not related to Sir Norman Lane Jude MLC. Doug butler ( talk) 02:08, 28 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, Tullyis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Tullyis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, Tullyis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Adelaide Meetup Next: 6 March 2020 Last: 19 May 2018

WikiProject Adelaide Meetup 22 has been hastily arranged, spread the word!

DATE: Friday 6 March 2020

TIME: 5.00–6.30 pm

VENUE: Cafe Amore, 162-170 Pulteney St, Adelaide

Celebrate the long weekend with a meet-up and discuss what you'd like to see in the world of Wikimedia in 2020. Sign-up and RSVP here.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Adelaide at 22:16, 5 March 2020 (UTC). You received this message because your user page is in Category:Wikipedians in South Australia. If you do not wish to receive future notifications, please advise Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Adelaide. reply