![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
I've seen you participate in a lot of WP:RM discussions so I thought I should ask you this. WP:DETERMINEPRIMARY recommends "Incoming wikilinks from Special:WhatLinksHere ( their count)" as a tool for determining primary topic. How exactly does one use that to determine the primary topic? Thanks, VR talk 15:49, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Name |
Page Views (Oct 2020 to Sep 2021) |
Wikilinks (all) |
Wikilinks (direct only) |
---|---|---|---|
Brian M. Fagan | 7,346 | 87 | 55 |
Fagan_(saint) | 2,306 | 44 | 16 |
Alex Fagan | 2,044 | 23 | 23 |
David Fagan | 3,151 | 23 | 23 |
James Fagan (MP) | 116 | 10 | 10 |
Shaun Fagan | 856 | 27 | 27 |
Name |
Page Views (Oct 2020 to Sep 2021) |
Wikilinks (all) |
Wikilinks (direct only) |
Article Wikilinks (all) |
Article Wikilinks (direct only) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brian M. Fagan | 7,346 | 87 | 55 | 59 | 37 |
Fagan_(saint) | 2,306 | 44 | 16 | 29 | 6 |
Alex Fagan | 2,044 | 23 | 23 | 8 | 8 |
David Fagan | 3,151 | 23 | 23 | 13 | 13 |
James Fagan (MP) | 116 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 |
Shaun Fagan | 856 | 27 | 27 | 18 | 18 |
Привет мой друг,
Why is the article not moved back to «Астана»? очевидно, что переход на Нур-Султан был неправильным. The move Was not Right, the people See this, but noone reacts to this.
Что я могу сделать, ты можешь мне помогаешь?
-- Tecumseh*1301 ( talk) 09:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Let me try to explain some things.
-- Toddy1 (talk) 23:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
May I make this section a subsection of the RM? It seems related. But the downside is that people might get confused as to where to !vote. VR talk 17:40, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Was just going through your page and wanted to say thank you for your help and outside perspective on the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ugochukwu75 which somehow has my name tagged in it. I really don't need anything. Just saying thank you....and.... that WIKIOPOLY is really cool. I am having trouble editing my talk page, so appreciate that board even more now then I would have before. Have a wonderful day! Film_Fanatical10069 t@lk 21:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
If you go to this link which shows 3 edits, you'll see:
07:01, June 30, 2020 Dr Silverstein talk contribs 264,934 bytes +3,257 →This article is not about rapes committed by Muslims
03:54, June 30, 2020 Vishnu Sahib talk contribs 743 bytes +191 →Undo this move: new section
03:41, June 30, 2020 Vishnu Sahib talk contribs 261,677 bytes +737 →Move without consensus
As you can see Vishnu Sahib's 3:54 edit removes most of the talk page, yet it shows that it only adds 191 bytes. Dr Silverstein's edit restores most of the 200K+ talk page, but it shows that it only adds 3,257 bytes. VR talk 06:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Toddy1, I didn't want to just revert that without talking to you first. I didn't just "reduce the sources from 11 to 6"; I had previously deleted the poor sources (broadwayworld.com, worcesterhearld) and gave a good explanation for why I did it. The sock UPE added them back in, of course, so when he was confirmed as a sock I simply reverted him because it took less time. I can go through and eliminate the bad sources again, with explanations, but that seems unnecessarily arduous. I would argue that leaving those bad sources there gives the impression that there's coverage from reliable sources, when there actually isn't. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 14:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Maybe you should take a wikibreak until the AFD is over.-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheels (2014 film) and previous deletion discussion (which took place before the article was moved)
I added that image only a short while ago and actually changed it from "imperial" to "Ottoman" [4], but I received a disambiguation alert on my talk page [5]. Turns out, "Ottoman", rather oddly, does not take you straight to the Ottoman Empire, or something on Ottoman culture. I guess Ottoman Empire might be the best fit, but long-term it seems sth. like Ottoman society and culture should exist and be where "Ottoman" goes. Iskandar323 ( talk) 10:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Well, Ishan87 start it first. If he can agree my accurate knowledge, then edit war will not be happen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DinosaursKing ( talk • contribs) 08:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Well, I will keep going edit "Largest prehistoric animals" about Megalodon, if Ishan87 making the mistake again. So hopefully Ishan87 will not making the mistake again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DinosaursKing ( talk • contribs) 09:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Well, I have many evidences can prove I'm right.
1)Average size adult Megalodon is not 10.5 meters. Is size of juvenile Megalodon. Yep, Juvenile Megalodon is 10.5 meters. https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/science/megalodon-shark-nursery-discovered/ “Our study suggests the specimens represent mostly juveniles with lengths between 2 and 10.5 meters,” https://cdn.britannica.com/51/200251-050-79878ECB/Studies-body-mass-megalodons-females-males-sharks.jpg http://www.prehistoric-wildlife.com/species/m/megalodon.html
2)Average size adult Megalodon is larger than 16 meters. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/03/world/megalodon-shark-scli-intl-gbr-scn/index.html
3)Megalodon maximum size is 20.3 meters. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2021/3284-estimating-lamniform-body-size DinosaursKing(talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DinosaursKing ( talk • contribs) 18:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Re this comment. Would you also be ok with "History of concubinage in the Muslim world"? Not as a preferred option but as an acceptable option. One reason I ask that is because there seems to be evidence from the Muslim world of "concubines who were not slaves". Thanks, VR talk 20:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
While the Circassians were normally Muslim, the ban against the enslavement of Muslims was overlooked in their case, and their original Muslim status was an "open secret".(So, an obvious Islamic law violation - that's taken from the Cariye page). Iskandar323 ( talk) 20:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
I've totally lost track of the source" story of my life ! VR talk 20:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
The Ottoman Imperial Harem was similar to a training institution for concubines, and served as a way to get closer to the Ottoman elite. Women from lower-class families had especially good opportunities for social mobility in the imperial harem because they could be trained to be concubines for high-ranking military officials.... paraphrased, I presume, from the source: Peirce, Leslie P. (1993). The imperial harem: women and sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire. New York. ISBN 0195076737. OCLC 27811454.
{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (
link)
Iskandar323 (
talk) 15:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Mughal emperors in India sometimes deposed a wife to the status of a concubine in order to promote a favorite." (The Oxford Encyclopedia of Women in World History, Volume 1 page 267) Since a wife had to be free, this is another example of a free woman becoming a concubine for political reasons. Sorry Toddy1 for bombarding your talk, I thought since we were already having this convo here, I'd paste my example. VR talk 12:32, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Toddy. If you recall, User:Film Fanatical10069 has an open unblock request. You may also recall, User:Fred Zepelin is very keen on seeing the request be unsuccessful. I left a comment on the unblock request stating my opinion on whether Film is a sock of User:Ugochukwu75. This resulting in an unceasing chain of replies which I consider to be bludgeoning the process and which descended into insults about my mental faculties and open mocking. Since you have some familiarity with the subject, perhaps you can mediate a little here. I don't want to have to escalate this any more than it needs to be. Thanks, -- SVT Cobra 17:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm baffled. I uncovered a sockpuppet, and then another one. His last account is still appealing. I offered evidence that shows he should not be allowed to edit again, because he deleted it off of his talk page and then deleted my comments over and over again to hide evidence. Yet, you're watching my every edit, and hounding me to the point where I can't understand what it is I did to deserve this behavior. I asked once what I'm missing and I got your flippant "What are you missing... (1) experience in SPIs, (2) perspective, (3) impartiality.-" comment. I'm asking again, and I'm not trolling. I really want to know why you seem to have taken an adversarial stance against the person that uncovered a paid editor that was socking, and taken the side of the paid editor that was socking. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 01:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Toddy, I didn't know where to tell you this, hope u don't mind me messaging it here. Bro, keep an eye on the activities of GorgeCustersSabre ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GorgeCustersSabre ). He edits articles based on his likes and dictates his bias everywhere, he was banned before but no change in his attitude. Ishan87 ( talk) 09:38, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I have never been banned. You may not agree with my edits (that's your right), but I try to edit in good faith and according to Wikipedia policies as I understand them. If I am wrong about a policy, show me. Don't just allege bias. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 10:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
I have spent some time on investigating Dusrapehelu. They seem to evade detection somehow. Hence the confusion on who the original sock master is. This presents a genuine problem of where to file the SPI. The experienced admins are much better than us in looking for clues. The sharp personal attack is one of the many characteristic of Dusrapehelu. Venkat TL ( talk) 12:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
In this comment did you mean "Google News search results for India"? I am under the impression that www.google.co.in refers to India, and www.google.co.uk would refer to Britain. Or are they the same thing? VR talk 00:45, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
About 181 results (0.22 seconds). If you press the button again, the filter choices reappear
Country: the UK Past year Sorted by relevance Clearand the number of results disappear.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next. Click on the number to the far right (10) and you get
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next. Click on the number to the far right and repeat until there is no "Next"
Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19. On each of the first 18 pages, it showed ten results. On the 19th page you have to count the number of results, which is six. Therefore, the search produced 186 results.
No i was not using a copy image that u had told to me i had upload this icon at the same time here in wikipedia as well as in facebook Malik umer 121121 ( talk) 09:27, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Toddy1,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—
DaxServer (
talk) 09:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Hi Toddy1,
I noticed that you were reverting some of the recent undiscussed moves of places in South Africa; thank you. I just wanted to note that there is an ongoing discussing regarding those moves at ANI, on the off chance you are unaware.
BilledMammal ( talk) 09:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
We need Wikipedia editors/admins with no connection to South Africa to look over this whole thing. 22:24, 4 January 2022 (I think he/she meant
connection with, which has a slightly different meaning.) Since I have no connection with South Africa, I am helping out
You forgot to sign the closure at Talk:Allahabad. Also, this might be useful for closing User:DannyS712/DiscussionCloser :) The current lightgreen is not so light after all 😂Maybe consider using the generic blue (like the moratorium closure) (can be selected if the DiscussionCloser script is used)? That seems to be the one preferred for normal discussion closures. Up to you ;) — DaxServer ( talk · contribs) 10:19, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 09:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Orania, Northern Cape. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Desertambition ( talk) 20:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
In case anyone feels the need to warn me about edit warring on
Orania, Northern Cape, I am aware that have made two reverts on 18 February, just as I made two reverts on 16 February. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Toddy1 (
talk •
contribs) 09:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello Toddy1, I ask that you stop following me around and opposing almost every edit I make. You tend to show up on posts I edit and it can come off as very ill intentioned. Especially given statements like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Toddy1&diff=1064517066&oldid=1063679115
Sorry if it seems that I am duplicating things that you already said in various South African move discussions, but Desertambition saidWe need Wikipedia editors/admins with no connection to South Africa to look over this whole thing. 22:24, 4 January 2022 (I think he/she meantconnection with, which has a slightly different meaning.) Since I have no connection with South Africa, I am helping out![]()
Also, what is your personal stance on white nationalism? Obviously you don't have to answer but I am curious. You called one of the users' complaints about "anti-white racism" legitimate. I am wondering if you think "anti-white racism" is an actual issue as well. Desertambition ( talk) 20:53, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
If you revert my edits, you ought to, at the very least, ensure that the blatant SEO linkspam in the Hindustan Times and other newspaper links is removed to ensure 5 pillar compliance. 49.36.179.171 ( talk) 04:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
I observe that you have an en-0 badge on your User page which indicates you have considerable difficulty in understanding the English language. If there are any misunderstandings between us due to language differences we should resolve these by discussion rather than by mindlessly reverting and edit warring. For example when you placed a CN tag on the aristocrat claim on Sanjeev Sanyal you were possibly unaware that Sanyal's father is a retired IAS officer of West Bengal cadre, which is a merit based position through a public selection process and so not a hereditary one. 49.36.179.171 ( talk) 04:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
I have started a discussion in which you may care to comment at [ [6]] Cheers Elinruby ( talk) 04:11, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
I'm not reporting you, I just have to put this here because I mentioned your username. Desertambition ( talk) 19:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 09:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Makhanda,_South%20Africa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Desertambition ( talk • contribs) 05:33, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi @ Toddy1. I just wanted to reach out and say thank you for all your help and guidance. I really could not have done it without you taking the time to guide me through those challenges I was facing. The amount of time you took and help you offered is something that is very commendable. Thank you! Film_Fanatical10069 t@lk 23:41, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I have requested a Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Requests#Tek_Fog, but it is pending for last 20 days. While they catch up with their pending lists, do you want to go through the article to fix any major copy edit problems that you see. I am seeking to unblock the DYK request that cannot move forward without the copy edit. Venkat TL ( talk) 11:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi Toddy1. Could you take sometime and have a look at Talk:Nizamuddin Asir Adrawi#Primary sources and see my response to the bad aspersions of the IP-user. I also requested MER-C to have a look but looks like they've been not active over the day. I'd appreciate your ideas and help. Regards, ─ The Aafī (talk) 21:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Asianfire22 ( talk · contribs) — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 09:25, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Everything I wrote in the talk page is in public domain and verifiable on reputed websites. Unfortunately, not so much in the English language, but in the Bengali language newspapers. For example in connection with the Turkish Urea scam in India. 49.36.179.135 ( talk) 17:23, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey there friend,
You added back some info in regards to the death of Ali, where it is indicated in parenthesis that Ali passed away in ‘modern day iraq’. But thats why the link is there for ‘Kufa’. The reader can click on it and see where it is. This is the purpose that the link serves. It also makes the article seem unprofessional if something is going to be added to specify for one section and not the other. I propose that either ‘present day KSA’ should be added or that these parenthesis should be removed all together. WatanWatan2020 ( talk) 02:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
![]()
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 15:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi, did you check the 2 sources before undoing my edits on AfriForum? Both go to 404 - Page not Found. Please explain. Rossouw ( talk) 16:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
removed duplicate source. The two sources were not duplicates; but they were badly labelled in their citation templates. So I checked both sources. Though the original URLs are dead, the archive-links worked fine. I corrected the page titles for each of them and provided data for the work field of the citation template. Your edit was mistaken. It was explained in my edit summary.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Toddy, would you kindly have a look at/watchlist this? Similar POV here. Regards. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 19:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
HI, I am sorry for this mistake. Thank you for the reference, I will take a look at it and read up on how to add sources in wikipedia before making my edits. I am working on citations and thoight they would finish in time to add with my edit however it is taking a bit longer. From now on I will post both edits and sources at the exact same time. THank you! 216.181.132.21 ( talk) 04:39, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 20:28, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Toddy1! Hope all is well with you. This proposal to rename Fatimah might be of interest to you. Please consider participating in it. Thanks! Albertatiran ( talk) 19:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Toddy,
Thanks for the message.
I can't see anything on the welcome page about conversion templates being compulsory - they are simply a tool to convert miles to km or vice versa. There is no need to use a template if the km/mile conversion is known.
My edits are constructive - I've simply been typing the conversion into the text without recourse to a template.
Cheers, Scott Newzild ( talk) 19:52, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
In the article "narcissism", I recently made an edit by replacing the several hundred years old source with a new source, but unfortunately, you have reverted this, can you please explain why? Sincerely, 202.169.23.60 ( talk) 06:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
aren't we all -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 11:27, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for alerting me to that. Sorry, I probably just haven't looked hard enough, but what type actually would be OK there? Or do you mean that the footnotes didn't need grouping at all? Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 06:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
References
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 08:59, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
FYI Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DavidWood11. Venkat TL ( talk) 08:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I ( Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 21:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
User:Buidhe has nominated Ironclad warship for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:04, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
User:Ayodhya-prayagraj is the Prayagraj sock. I forgot the name of the sockmaster. Venkat TL ( talk) 11:09, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 15:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 10:32, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Frontier Ventures and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 23#Frontier Ventures until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Ghost of Kiev
(talk) 16:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 12:56, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi Toddy, while I appreciate your contribution to the discussion on correct image for the
Eva Kaili article please can I ask you not to edit my comments without my permission. In line with
WP:TPO a user should never edit another users comments without permission.
Thanks for your understanding and happy editing!
Jo Jc Jo
Talk💬
Edits📝 22:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Toddy1, since you're an active Wikipedian and at /info/en/?search=User_talk:Tritomex#Crimean_Karaites on 13 April 2013 you had talked about Brook in relation to a different Wikipedia entry, you might wish to weigh in on the current "Request new section to discuss Brook 2022 and later studies that confirm or disconfirm it" (related to genetic evidence) at /info/en/?search=Talk:Khazar_hypothesis_of_Ashkenazi_ancestry#Request_new_section_to_discuss_Brook_2022_and_later_studies_that_confirm_or_disconfirm_it which relates to multiple currently undiscussed peer-reviewed sources that could be summarized in some manner on the page Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry, which has restricted-access for editing. Only three longtime Wikipedia editors have responded with their opinions thus far. 2600:1000:B104:1EB:8EB3:43B7:4A7B:8C7 ( talk) 00:44, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 19:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Toddy, good work on starting the Haren Prison article. Apparently there's already an article on it in the Dutch wikipedia and some info on the French as well.
Ανδρέας Κρυστάλλης ( talk) 16:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Not sure if you've noticed the recent edits here. A lot of material has been added, much of it poorly sourced. Then again, the existing page also had poorly sourced material. You've edited the page a fair bit in the past, so might have an opinion on it. Iskandar323 ( talk) 05:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi Toddy1, Firstly, let me start by saying how I've enjoyed working with you on developing the Qatar corruption scandal at the European Parliament since the beginning. I haven't been editing here long and it's been good to see your edits and correction as they've helped me learn.
I've spent this afternoon working on the article as I think it needed improvement. Lots of the article was written as events developed. Which, understandable, means the contributions have fallen in to some recentism. Heck, most of the edits I've made today are to my earlier contributions. The article was starting to read like a newspaper and I made some light language edits to correct this. The listed paragraphs of breaking events were starting to be indiscriminate so I moved some around to make sure the content was still readable as a encyclopaedic entry. The main purpose of my edits, however, was to address what needed to be included as citations. Due to this article being developed as news was breaking this has resulted in a hugely over cited article. All the sources that we're removed meet the WP:REFBOMB criteria and all the edits I made were following the cite trim instructions.
I've just seen you've removed all of today's work and restored an old version of the article which I find a little frustrating for two reasons. Firstly, I do not believe it is proper for you to identify two issues (that you've stated in your edit summary— I'm sure you spotted more) and then carte-blanche all edits because you "don't have time". Respectfully, if you don't have time then please correct the errors you find but don't assume bad faith by deleting all edits. If you don't have time I'm sure someone else would spot them. Maybe even I would have.
Secondly, you have made this revert and not notified me as the user who made the edits. I really would've appreciated you letting me know on my talk page that you have reverted an afternoon's worth of work. Respectfully, I believe you to be aware of the amount of work put in to those edits— notice would've been apprecaited.
For the errors you have identified in your edit summary;
I would kindly as you to revert your deletion and work at addressing which edits you disagree with or the errors I have made in my edits. I understand if you do not want to revert but it would be appreciated if you did assume good faith and take a look at the positive contribution I was trying to make to Wikipedia.
I hope we can continue to work on the article together— as I said, I've enjoyed it— and I hope to work on others together in future. Happy editing. Jo Jc Jo Talk💬 Edits📝 16:33, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
MEPs including Dino Giarrusso and Viola von Cramon stated that many countries approach MEPs "hoping to improve [their] country's reputation".i.e. it is normal for countries to approach MEPs for this purpose. This is the complete opposite of the inference in the cited source ( Der Spiegel), which was that it was a corrupt practice that should be investigated.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 23:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Adani Group, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Please discuss, dont revert.
WP:DONTREVERT
Strandofhair (
talk) 12:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC) See:
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx/Archive#28 February 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 21:30, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Hey Todd,
Basically, I didn't really get the full purpose of putting names, dates, translated titles and so forth when I originally started writing pages. After talking with you, I understand why adding that can add credibility to various articles and can just make it plain easier for 3rd parties to get without having to do more work. As you may have noticed, I've tried to do the full citation on everything going forward. I think going back and fixing up anything else I wrote would probably also be a good move. I appreciate your assistance throughout the whole process. You have been a ton of help, and I think I can best repay you by fixing these issues. Have a great day and always a pleasure to work with you. KatoKungLee ( talk) 13:32, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Todd.
You left a message on my talk page about an edit I made to this entry. However, I don't believe I have ever made an edit to this page (or visited before today). Is it possible someone is using my login; how can I check? Grapevine73 ( talk) 05:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
WhatsApp no. 2607:FEA8:4DC0:6F90:FCF8:F0B8:34E8:6DC7 ( talk) 13:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 21:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
You realize this UPE uses a Vietnamese IP to edit Vietnamese geographical subjects and the account to edit Indian businesses, has socked to evade their p-block, has made legal threats, and is currently engaged in personal attacks on their user talk? Valereee ( talk) 11:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Regarding [12] MOS:SEAOFBLUE does not say anything about related wikilink. It's says about you can't use multiple wikilink in a sentence. Separated coma sentence can be wikilinked. ( talk) 17:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC) posted by 103.39.128.97 and modified by DSP2092. The edit he/she is talking about is this one.
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 08:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Please note that you had started an edit warring by reverting constructive edits on Hyderabad which is an FA, thus please be refrain from these activities. Previously you have not been part of most of the discussions on this articles talk page, so i advice you to please go thru all the discussion during articles FA before reverting or adding info/images. I had spent lot of time and efforts to make this article an FA and don't want to indulge in edit warring, so please self revert ur edits. Regards :) Omer123hussain ( talk) 11:54, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Has this thing about Faizabad and Ayodhya resolved? I've been seeing edits like these [13] lately - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 12:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 18:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Hyderabad. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Kindly self revert your edit waring action] and to avoid blocking kindly do not involve in edit warring nor indulge other users :) Omer123hussain ( talk) 16:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi toddy1. Do you remember me? You awarded me a merit badge.
I would like to be unblocked. Can you help me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.41.98.105 ( talk) 18:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|1=Insert your reason to be unblocked here ~~~~}}
.
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 19:58, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Toddy1 Please move the pages if you think this much discussion at Talk:Allahabad railway division for page move is ok. And if we still need to wait tell me, I am willing to do that too. Shaan Sengupta Talk 12:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Toddy1 It looks like I have detected a sockpuppet of a blocked user @ Marxist Economist. The user goes by Atal Bihari Vajpayee BJP. I am sharing you a link that shows they have common interest. Between 2023-01-03 and 2023-09-02 on en.wikipedia.org User:Atal Bihari Vajpayee BJP ( talk | contribs) and User:Marxist Economist ( talk | contribs) both made edits to some pages in common. You can see a chronological list of all their edits on the Interaction Timeline or a table view on the Interaction Analyser. Please help to find some more proof to report. Or if you can help will be great. The user is editing on same pattern as of user blocked. The pages are also exactly same. Shaan Sengupta Talk 18:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
All the sources are from one book, so the statement is correct. Nowhere it is said that there are no other sources. Lugij ( talk) 19:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Ignoring the earlier requests you keep spoiling and deleting the article Hyderabad section, it include deleting an entire section without discussing on talk page and in-fact it also include deleting the warnings given to you on your talk page.
If you continue editing with such destructive attitude it will be reported which may effect to restrict your editing rights. :) Omer123hussain ( talk) 06:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Santa Das Kathiababa is a famous 18th century Indian Hindu spiritual leader, social worker and religious guru.My request is not to delete this edit from English Wikipedia. Thank you Srabanta Deb ( talk) 08:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Feodosia lat,long:
Since "upper Tower, Genoese fortress" is intact and clear in satellite imagery I chose 45.0215621,35.3992733.
Thanks for notifying the talk pages discussion to me, I strongly believe this user:Wikiking123454321 is a sock of @Toomanyyearskodakblack / @SahafatKaLover18 see same behavior violating WP:BOLP, vandalism, personal attacks, political agenda base edits at the same articles [20], [21]. I hope admin @ Bbb23: & @ Yamla: will deal with him. 223.123.86.10 ( talk) 11:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Is this your own creation? Seems like a quite instructive forewarning. Iskandar323 ( talk) 07:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
I spent a few minutes browsing through your contributions and I really admire what you bring to this beautiful encyclopedia. Wikipedia appears to be undergoing a negative transformation due to persistent online advocates who rigidly adhere to their own interpretation of what an encyclopedia should be. These individuals exhibit an attitude of superiority and scorn, contributing to an environment that feels bureaucratic and uninviting for potential new editors.
Thank you for upholding the true purpose of Wikipedia. Padurina ( talk) 18:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC) |
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Shaan Sengupta has given you a pack of Toblerone bars! Chocolate promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Toblerone bars are wonderfully delicious! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a pack of Toblerone bars, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
@ Toddy1 you deserve this more than me. Without you I would never have been able to do it. It feels so nice to see that you have always been guiding me whenever I go wrong. Someday when you request for being an administrator I shall be the first one to give my vote in favour for you. (Ofc if I still will be here. There are people who don't like me because of my political alignment.) Cheers buddy. Shaan Sengupta Talk 16:10, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Spread the goodness of Toblerone bars by adding {{ subst:Toblerone for you}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Hi @ Toddy1 I thought it was over since the last comment was three days before. I tried to carry forward the discussion at Capital talk page. Nigej got in and told me about my mistake and asked me to revert. I have done that. Do I need to do something more. Because I now want to get out of that thing. I have given 5b days of my time to that. I no longer want to be a part of this. Do I need to apologise for closing it. If yes please tell I will do so. I just want to get out of there ASAP. Shaan Sengupta Talk 07:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Do I need to apologise for closing it- no. Just try not to do it again.
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 21:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello
Toddy1, i was wondering if you could help with a talk page archive bot that would possibly archive discussions in a day or two please (preferably a day), I'll keep an eye for the response. Thank you.
shelovesneo (
talk) 07:44, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Santa Das Kathiababa's register has been attached with ample references today.
Why are you repeatedly trying to delete this registration even though there are enough references in these registrations Srabanta Deb ( talk) 13:56, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Have a look at this, shouldn't we have an official name as discussed by you here? - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 17:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Toddy1. I am back here to seek your help. You helped me in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marxist Economist. Because of your help it was successful. I have noticed another sock and have filed a report. I need your help to make it more strong. Please help me at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dibyanand02. Shaan Sengupta Talk 14:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Here is a list of the editors in chronological order (the number of edits is live edits - quite a few have deleted edits)
It seems likely that Lal chowk Ramchandrapur Lakhisarai and Lal chowk Ramchandrapur are the same person because of the similarity of name and interests, but their edits were eight years ago. Checkuser will not help unless they have been logging in but not editing (and possibly not then).
It seems unlikely that Dibyanand02 is Lal chowk Ramchandrapur Lakhisarai/Lal chowk Ramchandrapur. Dibyanand02 called the place Nand Nama, but Lal chowk Ramchandrapur Lakhisarai tried to change the name in the article to Ramchandrapur.
The name suggests that all the Chauhan accounts might be the same person.
You need to explain why you think these accounts are the same person (other than the similarities of some of the account names and their interests).
I think there might be something in that many of the accounts also use Commons, and some also use Hindi Wikipedia. But you need to find some similarities in their edits/uploads there if you want to use that as evidence.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
the same error with putting an image in the infobox of an article. Srabanta Deb Radha Krishna NamaCan you find stuff like that to support your SPI?-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 19:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)