![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hi CollectiveSolidarity. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 04:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
I have opened a sockpuppet investigation involving User:TruthTurtle88 as they have similar editing styles and disruptive editing on the Death of Regis Korchinski-Paquet page as other suspicious accounts in the past.
Since you've been in contact with them recently, feel free to leave your two cents here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/TruthPhone.
CaffeinAddict ( talk) 17:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
I have no idea what that post to my talk page that you undid was about, butit was repeated by yet another IP. Who is the banned user? If you meant 108.211.110.206 ( talk · contribs) then the user is blocked, not banned. Meters ( talk) 06:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Looks like the link you found https://electowiki.org/wiki/One_person,_one_vote copied from the source I attributed One man, one vote. I have already added a Copy attribution in Talk:One person, one vote, Section Copied from One man, one vote. Please remove the copypaste warning on One person, one vote HudecEmil ( talk) 04:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
( t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Dead Cells you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
ProtoDrake --
ProtoDrake (
talk) 08:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I wanted to thank you for reviewing all the new pages I've been making for United States House of Representatives elections in Texas. I noticed that on the first two pages you reviewed, you marked them as in need of secondary sources, and since you did that, I have been sure to find as many as possible for those and all subsequent pages. As I move further back in time, however, I think it is going to get harder and harder to find secondary sources about these elections, so I wanted to ask, what do you consider to be the minimum level of secondary source usage pages like these need? I will probably be able to use the Texas Almanac's political history sections as secondary sources for the general overview of the elections going back at least a few more decades. Would you consider that enough to establish notability? I will still be trying to find as many secondary sources as possible for these pages, but I just wanted to know what your criteria are for adding that tag. Thanks, OutlawRun ( talk) 15:43, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
96.74.77.193 (
talk) 07:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
what compelled you to move this to draft space? There are a few bad sources but nothing that requires draftification. PRAXIDICAE🌈 01:30, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 07:56, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
tag from
Miss Universe Myanmar 2018, which you proposed for deletion. I found the award is notable after doing a simple
Google book search.I have cleanup the Facebook refs and adding proper refs.
Notable award in
Myanmar.. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}}
back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! - Signed by
NeverTry4Me
Talk 08:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
(btw you're doing great <3) Hyperwave11 ( talk) 00:26, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on William Taylour requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Should be R2 but Im nominating under G6 (move) per WT:NPR discussion to rever DRAFTIFYcation
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos 02:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi! Asking you about the close of Talk:Crucifer#Requested move 21 June 2022. Erm... you are aware that discussions aren't votes, and unsubstantiated assertions aren't meant to carry much weight when evaluating a discussion's outcome? – Uanfala ( talk) 21:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, CollectiveSolidarity
Thank you for creating Lilly Moon.
User:Praxidicae, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
There are no sources on a BLP and a simple notability tag isn’t sufficient to indicate this.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Praxidicae}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
PRAXIDICAE🌈 00:40, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Praxidicae. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Lilly Moon, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
PRAXIDICAE🌈 00:40, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I hope this message meets you well. If you aren't too busy, do review this page Lojay. Your kind and encouraging words are always appreciated. Amaekuma ( talk) 17:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I acknowledge your message. Although I don't agree with everything you say especially regarding sourcing and wikipuffery, I have read all the articles you referred me to. Thanks for your feedback. I hope to keep getting better.
Also, unfortunately I don't know how to write any of the Nigerian major languages. I only know french and English.
Amaekuma ( talk) 06:41, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks for helping. Uricdivine ( talk) 00:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC) |
Hi,Thank you for your attention .. I edited some of the article but Can you specify the sections that require editing? Aye1399 ( talk) 08:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC) (talk) 12:38, 7 July 2022 Aye1399, hello there! The article reads a little bit like a news piece at the moment. Please read WP:NOTNEWS and also read MOS:WTW in the editorializing section. I believe that it is also inappropriate to refer to the Greek government response as being said by “Athens”, as it could create confusion why Athens is responding instead of Greece. Just mention the Greek official who specifically made the response instead of referring to just Athens. Anyway, I am on vacation at the moment, so I can do some editing on the article when I get back in a week or so. Cheers! CollectiveSolidarity ( talk) 20:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I want to ask you a question please, are you a manger in Wikipedia? Tofu54401 ( talk) 23:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
because there is a problem with a Wikipedia page Tofu54401 ( talk) 23:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
The Beta israel page. There is a study from 2010 that mentioned that the Ethiopian jews are cluster with semetic-speaking Ethiopians and not with the cushitic-speaking Ethiopians. Yet it doesn't mentioned in the Wikipedia page. Why is that if I may asks? Tofu54401 ( talk) 00:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
How can I do that? I'm not well familiar with Wikipedia. Tofu54401 ( talk) 00:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I just made a etit request. Check it out if you can. Tofu54401 ( talk) 01:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
edit* Tofu54401 ( talk) 01:20, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly. |
.. but you gave permission to be trouted. Thanks for fixing the oops.-- ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 20:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Newimpartial ( talk) 23:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
On 23 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dead Cells, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dead Cells was published in early access because the developers feared that there would be an "indiepocalypse"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dead Cells. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Dead Cells), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 02:23, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for this, and GAs, and for joining WP:QAI! Feel free to mention review wishes on the talk, and - of course - to review. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello I've re-edited the following article. You may re check it and let me know on the same which area needs improvement. Thanks Rejoy2003 ( talk) 17:32, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Your reversion of my change is incorrect. Primus Canada is not owned by Birch Communications. Birch Communications is itself a defunct entity, having been absorbed by Fusion Connect. It is not owned by Fusion Connect either. I provided citations for all the corrections to the page that I made. Primus Canada exists as a distinct customer facing organization with it's own employees, offices &c. so it should have it's own page, like Bell Aliant, Bell MTS, Aurora Cable Internet, and many other organizations. Please correct your error. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The axel ( talk • contribs) 22:04, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I need your help in a Wikipedia page called the "washalma dynasty". the washalma dynasty was found in the 13th century by the Arogoba people. Yet the Somalis in Wikipedia are keep delete it. Can you do something about it? Tofu54401 ( talk) 07:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, the WikiProject Vital Articles that you've recently joined is now conducting a drive for improving Vital articles. The drive aims to expand short Vital articles to 30 kilobytes in page size, and because of that, is named the 30 kB drive. The drive allows use of semi-automated editing (such as AWB and IABot), and would run from now to 31 August. Cheers, CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 09:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
hello @ CollectiveSolidarity, 2022 monkeypox outbreak/Statistics is an article again, but don´t remove it this time because it is now a Rederect to 2022 monkeypox outbreak#Statistics. Cabin134 ( talk) 22:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, CollectiveSolidarity ( talk) pleases I want you to help me check this page Tolani Baj, it had some well-meaning contributors copy edit and worked on it, I want to know when it will be due for review considerations or how to improve it. Thanks and God bless Celeboyz ( talk) 09:32, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
This award is given to CollectiveSolidarity for 195 reviews in the July NPP backlog reduction drive. Your contributions played a part in the 9895 reviews that took place during the drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 08:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC) |
Hello, CollectiveSolidarity,
It is not appropriate to move a 9 year old article to Draft space. Draftifying is for recently created articles, not long-standing articles. The editor who reverted your move pointed to this Village Pump Proposal as an explanation for reverting your move to Draft space. It would be worth your time to reviewing the results of this discussion that occurred earlier this year. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Elden Ring you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Vami IV --
Vami IV (
talk) 09:41, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello The Night Watch,
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.
Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.
{{subst:NPR invite}}on their talk page.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Vital Barnstar | |
Great job on adding reference and history content to Bow and arrow. Hopefully, this would be the first of many expansions to come. CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 15:20, 11 August 2022 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Million Award |
For your contributions to bring Elden Ring (estimated annual readership: 2,500,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg ( talk) 23:48, 12 August 2022 (UTC) |
Hello, Blablubbs and I blocked a few accounts earlier that used special characters to imitate your username. Did you create these as doppelgängers? No worries if so, although you’ll want to flag them as legitimate alternative accounts. If not then there’s nothing to do, they can just stay hardblocked. Thanks! firefly ( t · c ) 18:54, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
I moved article TUMnanoSAT to draft Draft:TUMnanoSAT from main space to draft and the editor of the page things am wrong. Am here to know if I have made the same mistakes I made last time because I don't want to. Uricdivine TalkToMe 13:43, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi CollectiveSolidarity, thank you for your review of Harcourt ministry. I am, however, a little confused why you tagged it with Template:refimprove. There are 15 citations in the article; every sentence after the opening paragraph is cited. What problem needs to be resolved? I plan on making similar articles to this in the near future, so I'd like to know how to avoid issues going forward. Thanks! — Kawnhr ( talk) 20:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
There is a lot of propaganda in the current war. The task of Wikipedia is to give a neutral assessment, and not to lean towards the propaganda of one side or another.
The only thing that can help here is common sense.
If we refuse to use it, there is no chance of neutrality.
Russia already controls Donetsk. Donetsk is inhabited mainly by citizens of Russia (people received Russian passports for 8 years. There are no citizens of Ukraine left there).
Name at least one reason for Russia to strike at Donetsk, or carry out remote mining?
At the same time, Russian military armies are actively moving around Donetsk. Its mining - can potentially complicate these movements. Not so much that it would make military sense, but enough not to create such problems for yourself.
The question is - why do you keep the obviously false statement that Russia is planting mines in Donetsk, but reject the obviously true one - that Ukraine is doing this?
I note that from the point of view of Ukraine, the entire population of Donetsk is the so-called "separas". That is, persons who have renounced Ukrainian citizenship are enemies of the Ukrainian state. The “separas” also include the children of Donetsk residents, as Petro Poroshenko, for example, repeatedly stated when he was the president of the country.
The OSCE forces repeatedly recorded shelling of Doncek by Ukraine, which had no obvious military goals. That is, the shelling was purely punitive in nature.
In this regard, I have a question: on what basis did you cancel my edit? It is clear that this is not a matter of neutrality.
Do you use Wikipedia for propaganda? 109.197.26.232 ( talk) 14:57, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, you removed an edit from the Cultural references category on the page for The Pleasant Valley War. I was referring to a book that was written as a fictionalized account of the range war in question. I believe that the line was removed in error. If not, can you let me know what I can do to have it added again? 2001:1970:4F63:A900:0:0:0:7942 ( talk) 17:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi The Night Watch,
For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I saw that the article hasn't been expanded for days, even though you chose it as part of the 30 kB drive. What's the hold up and how can I help you with that? CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 15:29, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, following up on your comments at Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Optional_RfA_candidate_poll, I was wondering if you'd mind taking a look at Sundrum Castle? Any comments very welcome. Thank you. - Kj cheetham ( talk) 19:42, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for improving articles in August! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Look at the church where I heard VOCES8. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:14, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I just wanted to thank you again for closing the thread. I wasn't going to pursue the issue anyway even though I have found many times over the last 28 years that threads on Internet fora between anonymous people simply become a platform for unreflected claims. I'm sure good faith was meant by the OP but familiarity with the topic being addressed and a better understanding of English would have been more helpful just as with other dissent which has been only 0.7% of the call to action. Your username does you proud, thank you for your support. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 02:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
On 2 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elden Ring, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the writer of Elden Ring compared the game's mythology to using a dungeon master's handbook in a tabletop RPG? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elden Ring. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Elden Ring), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
I didn't see any consensus for removal of the "Western democracies" qualification (Talk archive 102), but don't feel strongly one way or another. We'll see if other editors let it stand. Mason.Jones ( talk) 14:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
The first ever Vital GA Drive by the WikiProject Vital Articles has begun. The drive aims to improve Coffee and Land to good article status within 45 days, from 1 September to 15 October 2022. The Vital GA Drive is WikiProject Vital Articles's first step at achieving its ambitious goal: all Vital articles achieving good article status by 2032.
You've received this message because your name is on Wikipedia:WikiProject Vital Articles and Wikipedia:WikiProject Vital Articles/30 kB drive. If your name only appear at the 30 kB drive page, you won't receive any more future messages from the WikiProject. If you don't want to receive such messages anymore, you can remove the template {{MMsgI|user=YOURUSERNAME}} at the project's member list. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
( t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi CollectiveSolidarity. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 16:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 10:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Hi The Night Watch,
You have been invited, along with the other participants in Wikiproject Vital Articles, to start editing the Technology page and add references. Our goal is, by September 3rd, to have the article at least to B-class, but what would be generally preferable is to improve this article to the extent that it gets to GA-status. I may post a notice to the community bulletin board, but it is not definite. I hope to see the Technology article improved! 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 ⋅ 𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔⋅ 02:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
To request my attention, find my talk page and I will respond within 24 hours.
𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 ⋅ 𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔⋅ 02:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
I can't respond to you on SWViwer so I"m responding here. While I can do that, there's actually a specific user warning for changing between english variations which I can't leave via SWViwer to my knowledge. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:35, 29 September 2022 (UTC)