![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I closed this discussion as delete, and userfied the article here as requested. Take care. 21:13, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
You're invited to the
Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
June 14, 2009
Time: 3pm
Location:
Drexel University
In the afternoon, we will hold a session at Drexel dedicated to discussing Wikimedia Pennsylvania activity and cooperation with the regional Wikimedia New York City chapter.
Are events like a Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia in our future?
In the evening, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local sports bar.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 01:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
I see you were involved in the proposal to delete the Cooneyite article last year. As this and 2 related articles had lain dormant for some time without citations, I went through the CC article to get it down to information which could be cited. I had also begun to do this for the related Cooneyites and William Irvine article (if those edits preempted anything you were about to add, my apologies to you and Cirt, as at the time I didn't know you two had proposed adding some citations). At this point, the editor who had proposed deleting the Cooneyite article has returned and is disputing RS on the citations, restoring uncited information, and proposing using editor consenus instead of citable sources. I haven't seen this proposed before, so I was wondering if you might comment as to whether this would be valid. I personally do think the citations are RS (but I've spent many days tracking down citations, so I'm hardly without bias). My worry is that editor consensus without citation seems to be an open invitation for someone to delete material wholesale, or again propose Afd'ing the articles themselves. Is editor consensus a substitute for citing sources? Not sure I can preserve a cool head, as this comes on the heels of another member who insisted and dispute-tagged everything on what seems to be a premise that the group cannot be described at all. • Astynax talk 19:35, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tuan Nguyen, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikibin.org/articles/tuan-nguyen.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 10:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Tuan Nguyen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Jonathan Hall (
talk) 10:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Even if the criteria is wrong, you can't remove a speedy deletion tag from an article you created. I've deleted the article because you made very little improvement from the last deleted version. Keep working on it. When you are ready to move it to the main space, move it instead of creating a new one. That will preserve relevant history. Use {{ helpme}} to get input before moving it again. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Just a new Topic to get you started ShoesssS Talk 19:55, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Would you favor deleting Josh Segall as there is nothing unrelated to the election as well? BrianY ( talk) 18:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your help, support and friendly style of strangers like me. Chelovechek ( talk) 09:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 19:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
You're invited to the
Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
September 12, 2009
Time: 3 pm
Location:
University City,
Philadelphia
NOTE: The date and time of this meetup has been changed to accommodate other regional activities.
The purpose of this meeting is to finalize our plans for the Wiki Takes Philadelphia event. We'll discuss logistics, establish jobs, and coordinate with participating groups.
The floor will also be open to discussing other projects relating to the Wiki and Free Culture movement.
Afterward at around 5pm, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local sports bar.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 17:27, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
I saw your post on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ding_Day and I was interested in your comment that "it is not the responsibility of ONE individual to produce evidence of notability but the responsibility of the individual proposing the deletion to support the reasons of why NOT the article does not meet current Wikipedia standards of notability for inclusion".
I seem to be running into a brickwall at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Richard_Anthony_Jay despite having demonstrated notability under several criteria, in many references. Can you point me to an entry that bears out your above statement ? Or alternatively, give me your opinion on my page and how I can satisfy Wikipedia:Notability_(music) if you believe I haven't already done it ? Burningpetals ( talk) 22:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help) and
[3]
[4]The Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content |
Could you please answer the question asked at User talk:Graeme Bartlett#Declined G12 on Gmsh? MLauba ( talk) 11:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
NW ( Talk) 23:15, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
— Jake Wartenberg 05:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey there! I'd love to, I completely forgot to merge those. I didn't delete them, though; the content can be found here (CAS) and here (CFS). I would have put them on your subpage myself, but I wasn't sure what subpage you were referring to. Cheers, and keep up the great work! Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:14, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
I don't think your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Coghill is applicable. ;-) Cunard ( talk) 06:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Why thank you, sir.-- JohnnyB256 ( talk) 23:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Your courtesy is greatly appreciated. And I am so sorry that I did not hold onto the userfied Radio Tales articles longer. All 63 being nominated at the same time was overwhelming. MichaelQSchmidt ( talk) 00:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the recognition and for your guidance regarding AfD. I will always cherish my first barnstar. Hananekosan ( talk) 21:46, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
I noticed you made some edits to this new page and probably tried to help it survive. I removed some text that was not supported by references. Feel free to revert my changes. Cheers! Lattefever ( talk) 14:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Lattefever
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 20:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Oi! : )
I had just written a comment agreeing with your comment about my comment and then you went and deleted it from the AfD. I can take some robust criticism. This is what I wrote: "::: Comment - fair summary, although perhaps it would better to say that "I don't have the time to go and find reliable sources for an author who wrote 20 years ago." This takes extensive time and effort which to my mind is not worth it. I suppose I see that this person has written some 15 books about an area of early Australian history and thus is notable and over time more interested people than me will improve the article. I know this doesn't fit with how we do things around here but it seems more valuable to us to have this entry than to delete it. I am delighted that Google is providing you the sources you require. I find as someone who writes about early Australian history that it is rather poor in this area. When it has stuff it's very exciting but more often than not I am left seeking more information. Google is great but it ain't God...yet!
Please don't hang your head in shame. Tis good to have some people trying to keep the quality of WP high. I appreciate the work you are doing. Cheers, Gillyweed ( talk) 23:17, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Since you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashida Kim (6th nomination), which was closed as no consensus and later relisted after DRV decision, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashida Kim (7th nomination). Cunard ( talk) 08:17, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Do you really need me to list all of them for deletion? Given the current trend, it is quite obvious what will happen with the rest. TTN ( talk) 00:19, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw this at NPP. While the content is well sourced and it will be helpful to readers; don't you think this type of material would be more appropriate over at Wiktionary? Them From Space 03:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
You're invited to the
Wiki Takes Philadelphia
October 4, 2009
Time: 12 pm
Location:
Drexel Quad (33rd and Market)
University City,
Philadelphia
Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia is a photo scavenger hunt and free content photography contest to be held all around Philadelphia aimed at illustrating Wikipedia articles.
Scheduled for Sunday, October 4, 2009, the check-in location will be at the Drexel University quad (between Chestnut and Market, 33rd and 32nd) at noon, and the ending party and photo uploading (location to be announced) will be at 6 PM. To reach the Drexel quad, walk south from Market Street at 32nd Street into the campus.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 22:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Japanisches palais.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Japanisches palais.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Japanisches palais.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 19:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Seems all malformed and fucked up, baby. Crafty ( talk) 01:20, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
If I were you, I would consider withdrawing the RFA. That's just my opinion, but I hope that you will consider it. Please consider coaching though when all is said and done. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 14:13, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
I would strongly consider withdrawing your RFA soon as it is unlikely to change much in the next few days. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 01:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
I don't actually know how to close it. Perhaps you should ask one of the 'crats. Or just add a statement that you're withdrawing at the top of the nomination, and someone will do it properly. I'm sorry this happened--personally I do not regard the material referred to there as justifying the negative comments, & I would have said so after Julian had answered my question.
DGG (
talk ) 20:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Per your request, which I stumbled upon at DGG's page, I've closed your RFA. Sorry it didn't work out; it's good to see above that you're maintaining a good attitude about it. In the imortal words of Ed Koch, "the voters have spoken, and now the voters must be punished." -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 22:22, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
On Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M eat on the Bone (2nd nomination) you said that you thought that there might be an article in the topic if it was written properly. This is just to let you know that I have written something and it is at Meat on the bone. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 21:25, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
I know it was awhile ago, but on this file did you intentionally mark |Replaceability= Yes?-- Rockfang ( talk) 09:19, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:American_Sound.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Rockfang ( talk) 09:20, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
I think your style has rubbed some editors the wrong way. If you're interested in trying again for adminship in the future I would suggest avoiding the use of bolding (or at least using it very selectively), refraining from ALL CAPS, and resisting sarcasm and personal expressions of your personality and sense of humor. Otherwise, you can be yourself and join the ranks of the elite non-admin paramilitary cabal that actually runs this site ;). But seriously, you do seem to be getting some good feedback that you'd do well to consider. I hope you won't be discouraged and I thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia building effort. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 21:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 03:59, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in WP:Requests for adminship/Kww 3 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Sometimes, being turned back at the door isn't such a bad thing |
Hey, having looked at the comments on the AfD, I've proposed a compromise...no idea if I can actually do it, but I followed WP:IAR and just went ahead and did it anyways. Would love to hear your feedback. Frmatt ( talk) 21:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Do you think that ALL discussion that is undernead the "compromise" heading should be moved to the article talk page? Isn't that where discussion meant to improve articles belongs, on the article talk page? Slrubenstein | Talk 12:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Shoesssss: I saw you use the word "venting" ... I think maybe you meant "vetting"? I know I certainly make lots of spelling mistakes, and Id like to think the other people would point them out :-)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 21:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
|
Content
You're invited to the
Wiki Takes Philadelphia
April 11, 2010
Time: 12 pm
Location:
Drexel Quad (33rd and Market)
University City,
Philadelphia
Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia is a photo scavenger hunt and free content photography contest to be held all around Philadelphia aimed at illustrating Wikipedia articles.
Scheduled for Sunday, April 11, 2010, the check-in location will be at the Drexel University quad (between Chestnut and Market, 33rd and 32nd) at noon, and the ending party and photo uploading (location to be announced) will be at 6 PM. To reach the Drexel quad, walk south from Market Street at 32nd Street into the campus.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 15:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 16:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Ooh, good find. Please to be adding to the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:57, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Created at User:Shoessss/ChuDraft. Cheers, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 19:36, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Please see my reply to your recent comment here. Regards, Voceditenore ( talk) 07:03, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
I've now reflected enough in the article itself that I believe it will be clear to all that the book is notable. See Win Shares (book). You may want to reconsider your !vote (and then again, you may not!).-- Epeefleche ( talk) 07:11, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I've read through the Closing comments, and worked up a new page for eventually republishing. Could you look at and provide some thoughts? The page is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cmagha Thanks so much. -- Cmagha ( talk) 02:42, 22 May 2010 (UTC) Cmagha
Restored and userfied to User:Shoessss/Klemens Murańka. Let me know if you need anything else. :) Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:32, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 00:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi ! I have rewritten the article AfD'd last spring, and am working with the administrator to repost. Could you review and offer suggestions? It is HERE. -- Cmagha ( talk) 11:55, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 12:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp ( talk) 14:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
You closed the first AfD, but the article re-created with some additional sources. I've sent it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Salama (2nd nomination), and you may wish to comment there DGG ( talk ) 19:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 05:24, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Like this one]. I signed it for you. Thanks. Edison ( talk) 17:04, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Last December, your keep !vote was one of the main reason that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William "Bill" Douglass survived AfD. 11 months on, it is still unreferenced to independent reliable sources. Can you please provide suitable references to it, or if your feelings on BLP notability have changed at all, renominate it for deletion or merge it as you suggested. Thanks. The-Pope ( talk) 14:36, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 12:50, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 04:56, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Re: this edit, Absoluteastronomy.com is not a reliable source, and most of the articles are mirrors of Wikipedia. Fences& Windows 20:39, 1 January 2011 (UTC)