Hello, ScitDei, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
SwisterTwister
talk 00:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello!! ScitDei. I have posted my opinion wrt merger. Also, always post you comments on User's Talk page and not at his user page, as you did in my case. Cheers!!! Jethwarp ( talk) 13:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Also, please note that as you have started merger discussion, it is considered that you support the merger move. Therefore, you are not supposed to again vote like you did at Talk:Makardhwaja - as follows - *Support - Refers to the same person... In any case only one vote per person is counted. This info is for you knowledge for future cases. Thanks. Jethwarp ( talk) 14:06, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 ( talk) 11:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Shivam Setu ( U- T- C) 16:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rajeev Sivshankar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trait ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Saint Thomas Christians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush ( talk) 12:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Saint Thomas Christians. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush ( talk) 12:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
I don't know if you have Franciscans on your watch list, but I wonder if you could look at the latest edit to the article. An editor added some material to the article that I believe is a positive addition, but it is unsourced. Should a "citation needed" tag be added, or should it be undone with a clear edit summary saying it can be re-added with appropriate sources? CorinneSD ( talk) 18:46, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I see that you belong to WikiProject Catholicism, I speak Spanish and very little English, have expanded the article La Laguna Cathedral, can correct errors ?. Thank You.-- 83.52.84.86 ( talk) 15:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
What about List of people from Washington? -- Just my 2 cents -- Hemanshu ( talk) 12:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Catholic Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caritas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
The article was, before I edited it, highly promotional, |sourced only to its own websites and basically a list of branches complete with spamlinks to each. It's light on proper facts, such as funding and expenditure. I cleaned it up, but decided in the end that it was too promotional and self-serving even in my version. It's indubitably notable, so I'll restore and post here shortly for you to try to improve. Let me know if you need any help. I wonder if "Caritas International" would be a better title than the current version anyway? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, ScitDei. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Assisi Convent School (noida)".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. – Fayenatic London 23:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, ScitDei. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your addition to Joseph Vithayathil has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. – Joe ( talk) 15:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
After receiving the above message you have recreated the page, under a different title. You have made some changes, but the content of the page is still substantially copied, most of it verbatim, from the same source. As you have already been told, persistently infringing copyright may lead to being blocked from editing. Also, the page is blatantly written to promote the reputation of the person it is about, full of laudatory comment intended to impress the reader with what a wonderful person the subject of the page is. Wikipedia content needs to be written from a neutral point of view, and such promotional writing is not permitted by Wikipedia policy. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 22:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-- 07:10, Tuesday, January 2, 2018 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font>
tags, which are causing
Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
Additionally, your signature appears to go against WP:SIGAPP, which says to avoid markup that enlarges text.
Further, your markup seems to be intended to use the Algerian font if it's available and otherwise use Italic, but I don't think it could work, both because the font markup requires the word "face" and because "Italic" is not a face.
Please change
~~ [[User:ScitDei|<font color="Green" size="3.5pt" style="Algerian" face="Italic">ScitDei</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:ScitDei|Wanna talk?]]</sup>
: ~~
ScitDei
Wanna talk?to
~~ [[User:ScitDei|<span style="color:Green; font-family:Algerian">ScitDei</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:ScitDei|Wanna talk?]]</sup>
: ~~
ScitDei
Wanna talk?— Anomalocaris ( talk) 23:20, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, ScitDei. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Assisi Convent School (Noida) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No sources establishing notability of the school. GNG is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 01:42, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assisi Convent School (Noida) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 19:55, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)